Proof of the Keel-Mori Theorem
We present a detailed proof sketch of the Keel-Mori theorem, following the approach of Conrad (which streamlines the original proof of Keel and Mori). The theorem states that every separated Deligne-Mumford stack with finite inertia admits a coarse moduli space as an algebraic space.
1. Setup and Notation
Let be a locally noetherian scheme and a separated Deligne-Mumford stack of finite type over with finite inertia . Then there exists a coarse moduli space where is a separated algebraic space of finite type over , and:
- is proper and quasi-finite.
- .
- For every algebraically closed field , the map is bijective.
Throughout, we fix a separated DM stack of finite type over with finite inertia .
2. Step 1 β Γtale-Local Reduction to Quotient Stacks
The first key step is to reduce the problem to quotient stacks where is a finite group acting on an affine scheme .
Let be a separated DM stack with finite inertia and a geometric point with automorphism group . Then there exists an affine scheme with a -action, a -fixed point mapping to , and an Γ©tale morphism
that induces an isomorphism on residual gerbes at .
Since is DM, there exists an Γ©tale atlas with a scheme. Choose a geometric point mapping to . The fiber over the diagonal is an Γ©tale equivalence relation, and the stabilizer group at is the finite group .
By the theory of Γ©tale groupoids, we can find an Γ©tale neighborhood of such that Γ©tale-locally near . Shrinking (and possibly replacing by a henselian local scheme), we get for some Γ©tale neighborhood of .
Taking to be an affine -invariant neighborhood of in gives the desired Γ©tale-local description.
This reduction is crucial: it means we only need to construct the coarse moduli space for quotient stacks and then glue.
3. Step 2 β Coarse Moduli Space for (Finite Group Quotients)
For a finite group acting on an affine scheme , the coarse moduli space is the classical GIT quotient:
Let be a finite group acting on an affine scheme . Then the coarse moduli space of is , where is the ring of invariants.
We verify the coarse moduli space axioms:
Universality: Let be a morphism to an algebraic space . The composite is -invariant, hence factors through a -invariant morphism . Since is the categorical quotient in the category of affine schemes, the map factors uniquely as .
To extend this to the non-affine case, we use that is a sheaf for the Γ©tale topology and that is a categorical quotient for the Γ©tale topology on the category of algebraic spaces.
Geometric bijectivity: For an algebraically closed field , we have
since over algebraically closed fields, -orbits on -points are exactly the -points of the GIT quotient (by Hilbert's theorem on invariants). These sets are naturally in bijection.
Structure sheaf: The map induces , and the latter equals (since is finite and acts on ). Thus .
The finiteness of is essential: is a finitely generated -algebra when is (by Noether's theorem on invariants, or more generally by finiteness of the integral closure for finite group actions). This ensures is of finite type over .
4. Step 3 β Constructing the Coarse Moduli Space Globally
The global construction proceeds by gluing the local quotients obtained in Step 1. The key challenge is to show the gluing is well-defined.
Gluing strategy: Cover by Γ©tale-local quotient presentations . Each has a coarse moduli space . On overlaps, the coarse moduli spaces are canonically isomorphic (by the uniqueness of the coarse moduli space for any open substack).
More precisely:
Step 3a: Choose an Γ©tale cover. For each geometric point of , choose an Γ©tale neighborhood as in Step 1. By quasi-compactness of , finitely many of these cover: .
Step 3b: Form local coarse moduli spaces. For each , set . By Step 2, is a coarse moduli map.
Step 3c: Construct gluing data. For each pair , consider the fiber product . This is an Γ©tale equivalence relation on . The coarse moduli space functor, applied to , gives an Γ©tale equivalence relation on .
Specifically, define as the coarse moduli space of . The projections and are Γ©tale (because the original projections are Γ©tale, and the coarse moduli space functor preserves Γ©taleness in appropriate situations).
Step 3d: Verify the cocycle condition. On triple overlaps, the transitivity of the equivalence relation on descends to transitivity for the equivalence relation on .
Step 3e: Form the quotient. The algebraic space is defined as the quotient
where . Since is an Γ©tale equivalence relation on schemes, the quotient is an algebraic space.
5. Step 4 β Verifying the Universal Property
Let be a morphism to an algebraic space . We need to show factors uniquely through .
Γtale-locally: On each , the morphism factors uniquely through (by Step 2). This gives maps .
Compatibility: On overlaps, the two factorizations and must agree. This follows from the uniqueness of the factorization on : the coarse moduli map for is , and factors uniquely through .
Gluing: The compatible family descends to a unique morphism with .
6. Step 5 β Properties of the Coarse Moduli Map
Properness of
We verify properness using the valuative criterion.
Finite type: is of finite type because Γ©tale-locally it is , which is finite (hence of finite type).
Separatedness: The diagonal is representable and proper. Since is separated, this is a closed immersion, giving separatedness of .
Universal closedness: Let be a DVR with fraction field and consider a commutative diagram
We need to find a lift . Γtale-locally on , the stack is and . The map lifts to after a finite extension of (since is finite surjective). The composite gives the required lift (after possibly replacing by a finite extension, which is allowed for properness).
More carefully: the stack is proper over because Γ©tale-locally the map is proper (it is a finite gerbe). A morphism that is Γ©tale-locally proper is proper.
The Structure Sheaf Property
Γtale-locally on , we have and . Then
The first equality uses that pushforward from to is taking -invariants. The second is the definition of . Since this holds Γ©tale-locally, it holds globally.
7. Step 6 β Geometric Bijectivity
Let be an algebraically closed field. We need to show is bijective.
Surjectivity: Let . Γtale-locally, and lifts to a -point (since is algebraically closed and is surjective). The image of in maps to , giving surjectivity.
Injectivity: Let with . Γtale-locally, correspond to -points with the same image in . This means and lie in the same -orbit: for some . Therefore in (they are isomorphic as objects of the groupoid), so they represent the same isomorphism class in .
8. The Hilbert Scheme Trick
The original proof of Keel and Mori uses the "Hilbert scheme trick" to reduce from general DM stacks to quotient stacks. This technique deserves special attention.
Let be a separated DM stack of finite type over with finite inertia. Then there exists a scheme with a finite flat groupoid such that Γ©tale-locally on .
The idea: choose an Γ©tale atlas and consider the Hilbert scheme (or more precisely, the Weil restriction) that parametrizes liftings of geometric points of to . This produces a finite flat cover of by a scheme, giving the desired groupoid presentation.
Let be an Γ©tale atlas. Consider the representable morphism whose fiber over a point is the set of automorphisms of the pullback of the atlas to .
Since has finite inertia, the groupoid has finite fibers. The key observation: the morphism is finite (because the diagonal of is finite, being the composition of the unramified diagonal of a DM stack with the finite inertia map).
Now consider the "symmetrized" version: define (informally, the -th symmetric product where is the degree of ). This carries a natural finite flat equivalence relation, and the quotient recovers Γ©tale-locally.
9. Technical Lemmas
Several technical results are needed in the proof:
Let be a finite flat groupoid in schemes (with of finite type over ). Then the quotient sheaf (in the fppf topology) is an algebraic space.
The quotient is an fppf sheaf by descent. The diagonal is representable because is a scheme (the diagonal is the map , which is an isomorphism by effectivity of the groupoid). The atlas is finite (hence in particular surjective), giving condition (3).
Let be the coarse moduli map and a flat morphism of algebraic spaces. Then is the coarse moduli map for .
This is important for the Γ©tale-local verification: once we know the coarse moduli space Γ©tale-locally, flat base change ensures compatibility.
10. Separatedness of the Coarse Moduli Space
We verify the valuative criterion for separatedness of .
Let be a DVR with fraction field , and two morphisms agreeing on . We need .
Pull back to : the fiber products are DM stacks proper over (since is proper). The generic fibers are isomorphic (since on ).
Since is separated, the isomorphism on generic fibers extends to a morphism of the whole stacks over . Applying to both sides, we get (using , which implies detects equality of maps from reduced schemes).
11. Summary of the Proof Architecture
The proof has the following logical structure:
-
Local structure: Show is Γ©tale-locally a quotient stack (using the DM condition and finite inertia).
-
Local quotient: Construct as the coarse moduli space of .
-
Glue: Use the Γ©tale descent of the coarse moduli spaces to form a global algebraic space .
-
Verify properties: Check universality, geometric bijectivity, properness, and by reducing to the Γ©tale-local (quotient stack) case.
The original Keel-Mori proof uses a somewhat different approach: instead of the Γ©tale-local reduction, they directly construct the coarse moduli space using the Hilbert scheme trick and a careful analysis of finite flat groupoids. Conrad's approach, which we followed, is more conceptual and generalizes more readily.
12. Example: Walking Through the Proof for
Let us illustrate the proof for , the moduli stack of elliptic curves.
Setup: is a smooth DM stack over . The generic automorphism group is (the involution ), with enhanced automorphisms at (group ) and (group ).
Step 1: Near a generic point (say ), the stack is Γ©tale-locally where is an affine open in the -line.
Step 2: The quotient is itself (since acts trivially on the -line β the -invariant is already an invariant). So the coarse moduli space is the -line.
Step 3: Near , the local picture is where is a local ring at . The invariant ring is again the local ring at (since is the invariant coordinate).
Step 4: Gluing gives (the -line), with the map sending an elliptic curve to its -invariant. The property holds because the automorphism groups act trivially on functions (they act on the curve, not the base).
References
- S. Keel and S. Mori, "Quotients by groupoids," Ann. of Math. 145 (1997), 193-213.
- B. Conrad, "The Keel-Mori theorem via stacks," preprint, 2005.
- J. Alper, J. Hall, and D. Rydh, "A Luna Γ©tale slice theorem for algebraic stacks," Ann. of Math. 191 (2020), 675-738.
- M. Olsson, Algebraic Spaces and Stacks, AMS Colloquium Publications, 2016, Chapter 11.