ConceptComplete

Quasi-Coherent Sheaves on Algebraic Spaces

The theory of quasi-coherent sheaves on algebraic spaces is developed using the Γ©tale topology, since algebraic spaces do not have a Zariski topology with the same good properties as schemes. A quasi-coherent sheaf on an algebraic space XX is essentially a quasi-coherent sheaf on an Γ©tale atlas UU, equipped with descent data along the equivalence relation R=UΓ—XUR = U \times_X U.


1. Sheaves on the Γ‰tale Site

DefinitionÉtale site of an algebraic space

Let XX be an algebraic space. The small Γ©tale site XeˊtX_{\text{Γ©t}} is the category whose objects are Γ©tale morphisms Uβ†’XU \to X with UU a scheme, and whose coverings are jointly surjective families of Γ©tale morphisms.

An abelian sheaf on XeˊtX_{\text{Γ©t}} is a contravariant functor from XeˊtX_{\text{Γ©t}} to abelian groups satisfying the sheaf condition: for every Γ©tale covering {Uiβ†’U}\{U_i \to U\} in XeˊtX_{\text{Γ©t}}, the sequence

0β†’F(U)β†’βˆiF(Ui)β‡‰βˆi,jF(UiΓ—UUj)0 \to \mathcal{F}(U) \to \prod_i \mathcal{F}(U_i) \rightrightarrows \prod_{i,j} \mathcal{F}(U_i \times_U U_j)

is exact.

DefinitionStructure sheaf

The structure sheaf OX\mathcal{O}_X on XeˊtX_{\text{Γ©t}} is defined by OX(U)=Ξ“(U,OU)\mathcal{O}_X(U) = \Gamma(U, \mathcal{O}_U) for each Γ©tale Uβ†’XU \to X.


2. Quasi-Coherent Sheaves

DefinitionQuasi-coherent sheaf on an algebraic space

A sheaf of OX\mathcal{O}_X-modules F\mathcal{F} on XeˊtX_{\text{Γ©t}} is quasi-coherent if for every Γ©tale morphism Ο†:Vβ†’U\varphi: V \to U in XeˊtX_{\text{Γ©t}}, the natural map

Ο†βˆ—F(U)=F(U)βŠ—OX(U)OX(V)β†’F(V)\varphi^* \mathcal{F}(U) = \mathcal{F}(U) \otimes_{\mathcal{O}_X(U)} \mathcal{O}_X(V) \to \mathcal{F}(V)

is an isomorphism. We denote the category of quasi-coherent sheaves by QCoh(X)\mathrm{QCoh}(X).

Equivalently, using an Γ©tale presentation R⇉UR \rightrightarrows U of XX:

DefinitionQCoh via descent data

A quasi-coherent sheaf on X=U/RX = U/R is a pair (FU,Ξ±)(\mathcal{F}_U, \alpha) where:

  1. FU\mathcal{F}_U is a quasi-coherent sheaf on UU, and
  2. Ξ±:sβˆ—FUβ†’βˆΌtβˆ—FU\alpha: s^*\mathcal{F}_U \xrightarrow{\sim} t^*\mathcal{F}_U is an isomorphism of sheaves on RR, satisfying the cocycle condition: on RΓ—s,U,tRR \times_{s,U,t} R, the composite
pr1βˆ—Ξ±βˆ˜pr2βˆ—Ξ±=(m∘(pr1,pr2))βˆ—Ξ±\mathrm{pr}_1^* \alpha \circ \mathrm{pr}_2^* \alpha = (m \circ (\mathrm{pr}_1, \mathrm{pr}_2))^* \alpha

where m:RΓ—s,U,tRβ†’Rm: R \times_{s,U,t} R \to R is the composition in the groupoid, and the unit condition: eβˆ—Ξ±=ide^*\alpha = \mathrm{id} where e:Uβ†’Re: U \to R is the identity section.


3. Coherent Sheaves

DefinitionCoherent sheaf on an algebraic space

Let XX be a locally noetherian algebraic space. A quasi-coherent sheaf F\mathcal{F} on XX is coherent if for some (hence every) Γ©tale atlas Uβ†’XU \to X, the pullback F∣U\mathcal{F}|_U is a coherent sheaf on UU.

We denote the category of coherent sheaves by Coh(X)\mathrm{Coh}(X).

TheoremProperties of QCoh(X)

Let XX be a quasi-separated algebraic space. Then:

  1. QCoh(X)\mathrm{QCoh}(X) is an abelian category.
  2. QCoh(X)\mathrm{QCoh}(X) is a Grothendieck abelian category (it has a generator and filtered colimits are exact).
  3. If XX is noetherian, Coh(X)\mathrm{Coh}(X) is an abelian subcategory of QCoh(X)\mathrm{QCoh}(X), and every quasi-coherent sheaf is a filtered colimit of coherent subsheaves.

4. Examples of Quasi-Coherent Sheaves

ExampleStructure sheaf

The structure sheaf OX\mathcal{O}_X is a quasi-coherent sheaf on any algebraic space XX. In the descent-data formulation with presentation R⇉UR \rightrightarrows U, it corresponds to (OU,can)(\mathcal{O}_U, \mathrm{can}) where can:sβˆ—OUβ‰…ORβ‰…tβˆ—OU\mathrm{can}: s^*\mathcal{O}_U \cong \mathcal{O}_R \cong t^*\mathcal{O}_U is the canonical isomorphism.

ExampleIdeal sheaf of a closed subspace

Let Zβ†ͺXZ \hookrightarrow X be a closed immersion of algebraic spaces. The ideal sheaf IZβŠ‚OX\mathcal{I}_Z \subset \mathcal{O}_X is a quasi-coherent sheaf. On an atlas Uβ†’XU \to X, it restricts to the ideal sheaf of ZΓ—XUβ†ͺUZ \times_X U \hookrightarrow U.

ExamplePullback sheaves

Let f:Xβ†’Yf: X \to Y be a morphism of algebraic spaces and G∈QCoh(Y)\mathcal{G} \in \mathrm{QCoh}(Y). The pullback fβˆ—G∈QCoh(X)f^*\mathcal{G} \in \mathrm{QCoh}(X) is defined by choosing atlases and using the pullback on schemes. Concretely, if Uβ†’XU \to X and Vβ†’YV \to Y are atlases with ff lifting to f~:Uβ†’V\tilde{f}: U \to V, then (fβˆ—G)∣U=f~βˆ—(G∣V)(f^*\mathcal{G})|_U = \tilde{f}^*(\mathcal{G}|_V) with appropriate descent data.

ExamplePushforward sheaves

For a quasi-compact quasi-separated morphism f:Xβ†’Yf: X \to Y, the pushforward fβˆ—Ff_*\mathcal{F} of a quasi-coherent sheaf F\mathcal{F} on XX is quasi-coherent on YY. This is computed via: for Γ©tale Vβ†’YV \to Y, we have fβˆ—F(V)=F(XΓ—YV)f_*\mathcal{F}(V) = \mathcal{F}(X \times_Y V), using the global sections of F\mathcal{F} on the algebraic space XΓ—YVX \times_Y V.

ExampleLine bundles on quotients

Let X=U/GX = U/G where GG is a finite group acting freely on a scheme UU. A line bundle on XX corresponds to a GG-linearized line bundle on UU: a line bundle L\mathcal{L} on UU together with isomorphisms gβˆ—Lβ‰…Lg^*\mathcal{L} \cong \mathcal{L} for each g∈Gg \in G, satisfying the cocycle condition. The Picard group Pic(X)\mathrm{Pic}(X) fits in an exact sequence 0β†’Pic(X)β†’Pic(U)Gβ†’H2(G,O(U)Γ—)0 \to \mathrm{Pic}(X) \to \mathrm{Pic}(U)^G \to H^2(G, \mathcal{O}(U)^\times).

ExampleLocally free sheaves

A quasi-coherent sheaf E\mathcal{E} on XX is locally free of rank rr if E∣U\mathcal{E}|_U is locally free of rank rr for some Γ©tale atlas Uβ†’XU \to X. Vector bundles on XX correspond to locally free sheaves, just as for schemes.

ExampleSheaf of differentials

For a smooth algebraic space XX of dimension dd over a field kk, the sheaf of KÀhler differentials ΩX/k1\Omega^1_{X/k} is a locally free sheaf of rank dd. On an atlas U→XU \to X, it restricts to ΩU/k1\Omega^1_{U/k}, with descent data coming from the étale equivalence relation.

ExampleSkyscraper sheaves

Let x∈∣X∣x \in |X| be a closed point of an algebraic space XX over a field kk, with residue field ΞΊ(x)\kappa(x). The skyscraper sheaf iβˆ—ΞΊ(x)i_*\kappa(x) (where i:Spec(ΞΊ(x))β†’Xi: \mathrm{Spec}(\kappa(x)) \to X) is a coherent sheaf on XX supported at xx.

ExampleQCoh on the quotient of A^1 by Z/2

Let X=Ak1/(Z/2Z)X = \mathbb{A}^1_k / (\mathbb{Z}/2\mathbb{Z}) where the action is xβ†¦βˆ’xx \mapsto -x (restricted to A1βˆ–{0}\mathbb{A}^1 \setminus \{0\} for freeness). A quasi-coherent sheaf on XX is a k[x,xβˆ’1]k[x, x^{-1}]-module MM with an isomorphism Οƒβˆ—Mβ‰…M\sigma^* M \cong M satisfying the cocycle condition. This is the same as a module over the invariant ring k[x2,xβˆ’2]=k[t,tβˆ’1]k[x^2, x^{-2}] = k[t, t^{-1}] where t=x2t = x^2.

ExampleTensor products and internal hom

For F,G∈QCoh(X)\mathcal{F}, \mathcal{G} \in \mathrm{QCoh}(X), the tensor product FβŠ—OXG\mathcal{F} \otimes_{\mathcal{O}_X} \mathcal{G} is quasi-coherent. When F\mathcal{F} is of finite presentation, Hom(F,G)\mathcal{H}om(\mathcal{F}, \mathcal{G}) is also quasi-coherent. These operations are computed on any atlas and then descended.

ExampleFlat quasi-coherent sheaves

A quasi-coherent sheaf F\mathcal{F} on XX is flat if F∣U\mathcal{F}|_U is flat over OU\mathcal{O}_U for some (hence any) atlas Uβ†’XU \to X. Flatness is an Γ©tale-local property. For a morphism f:Xβ†’Yf: X \to Y of algebraic spaces, F\mathcal{F} is ff-flat if the stalks are flat over the corresponding local rings of YY.

ExampleDualizing sheaf

For a proper Cohen-Macaulay algebraic space XX of pure dimension dd over a field kk, the dualizing sheaf Ο‰X\omega_X is a coherent sheaf that represents the functor F↦Hd(X,F)∨\mathcal{F} \mapsto H^d(X, \mathcal{F})^\vee on coherent sheaves. It exists as a consequence of Grothendieck duality for algebraic spaces.


5. Descent and Effectivity

The key theorem underlying the theory of quasi-coherent sheaves on algebraic spaces is:

TheoremFaithfully flat descent for QCoh

Let f:U→Xf: U \to X be an étale surjection from a scheme UU to an algebraic space XX. Then the pullback functor

fβˆ—:QCoh(X)β†’QCoh(U)descf^*: \mathrm{QCoh}(X) \to \mathrm{QCoh}(U)^{\mathrm{desc}}

is an equivalence of categories, where QCoh(U)desc\mathrm{QCoh}(U)^{\mathrm{desc}} is the category of quasi-coherent sheaves on UU with descent data relative to ff.

Proof

This follows from faithfully flat descent for quasi-coherent sheaves (since Γ©tale morphisms are flat) combined with the fact that Γ©tale descent is effective for quasi-coherent sheaves. Given descent data (FU,Ξ±)(\mathcal{F}_U, \alpha) on R⇉UR \rightrightarrows U, the descended sheaf on XX is the equalizer of sβˆ—FU⇉tβˆ—FUs_*\mathcal{F}_U \rightrightarrows t_*\mathcal{F}_U in an appropriate sense. The cocycle condition ensures this construction gives a well-defined quasi-coherent sheaf on XX.

β– 

6. Global Sections and Cohomology

DefinitionGlobal sections

For a quasi-coherent sheaf F\mathcal{F} on an algebraic space XX, the global sections are

Ξ“(X,F)=H0(Xeˊt,F)\Gamma(X, \mathcal{F}) = H^0(X_{\text{Γ©t}}, \mathcal{F})

computed as sections of F\mathcal{F} on the final object of XeˊtX_{\text{ét}}.

For a quasi-compact quasi-separated algebraic space XX with atlas U→XU \to X and R=U×XUR = U \times_X U, the global sections can be computed as the equalizer:

0β†’Ξ“(X,F)β†’Ξ“(U,F∣U)⇉Γ(R,F∣R)0 \to \Gamma(X, \mathcal{F}) \to \Gamma(U, \mathcal{F}|_U) \rightrightarrows \Gamma(R, \mathcal{F}|_R)

Higher cohomology is computed using the Γ©tale topology:

Hi(X,F)=Hi(Xeˊt,F)H^i(X, \mathcal{F}) = H^i(X_{\text{ét}}, \mathcal{F})
TheoremCohomology via Cech complex

Let XX be a quasi-compact quasi-separated algebraic space with atlas Uβ†’XU \to X. For F∈QCoh(X)\mathcal{F} \in \mathrm{QCoh}(X), the Γ©tale cohomology Hi(X,F)H^i(X, \mathcal{F}) can be computed using the Cech complex associated to Uβ†’XU \to X:

0β†’F(U)β†’F(UΓ—XU)β†’F(UΓ—XUΓ—XU)β†’β‹―0 \to \mathcal{F}(U) \to \mathcal{F}(U \times_X U) \to \mathcal{F}(U \times_X U \times_X U) \to \cdots

7. The Derived Category

DefinitionDerived category of an algebraic space

For a quasi-compact quasi-separated algebraic space XX, the derived category Dqc(X)D_{\mathrm{qc}}(X) is the full subcategory of D(OXeˊt-Mod)D(\mathcal{O}_{X_{\text{ét}}}\text{-Mod}) consisting of complexes with quasi-coherent cohomology sheaves.

TheoremProperties of D_qc(X)

For XX quasi-compact and quasi-separated:

  1. Dqc(X)D_{\mathrm{qc}}(X) is a compactly generated triangulated category.
  2. If XX is noetherian, the compact objects in Dqc(X)D_{\mathrm{qc}}(X) are the perfect complexes.
  3. The natural functor D(QCoh(X))β†’Dqc(X)D(\mathrm{QCoh}(X)) \to D_{\mathrm{qc}}(X) is an equivalence.

8. Comparison with Scheme Theory

TheoremQCoh on schemes vs algebraic spaces

If XX is a scheme, then QCoh(Xeˊt)β‰…QCoh(XZar)\mathrm{QCoh}(X_{\text{Γ©t}}) \cong \mathrm{QCoh}(X_{\mathrm{Zar}}). That is, quasi-coherent sheaves on the Γ©tale site of a scheme are the same as quasi-coherent sheaves on the Zariski site.

This comparison theorem ensures that the theory of quasi-coherent sheaves on algebraic spaces is a genuine generalization of the theory on schemes, with no unexpected discrepancies for the scheme case.

ExampleComparison for affine schemes

For X=Spec(A)X = \mathrm{Spec}(A), we have QCoh(Xeˊt)β‰…QCoh(XZar)β‰…A-Mod\mathrm{QCoh}(X_{\text{Γ©t}}) \cong \mathrm{QCoh}(X_{\mathrm{Zar}}) \cong A\text{-Mod}. A quasi-coherent sheaf on the Γ©tale site is determined by its value on the affine scheme, which is just an AA-module.


9. Picard Group and Line Bundles

DefinitionPicard group of an algebraic space

The Picard group Pic(X)\mathrm{Pic}(X) of an algebraic space XX is the group of isomorphism classes of invertible sheaves (line bundles) on XX, with the tensor product as group operation.

Remark

For algebraic spaces that are not schemes, Pic(X)\mathrm{Pic}(X) may behave differently than expected. In particular, an algebraic space need not admit any non-trivial line bundle. The non-existence of ample line bundles is precisely what prevents certain algebraic spaces from being schemes.


References

  • The Stacks Project, Tag 03LG: Cohomology of Algebraic Spaces.
  • D. Knutson, Algebraic Spaces, LNM 203, Chapter IV.
  • B. Conrad, Cohomological Descent, notes available online.
  • J. Lurie, Derived Algebraic Geometry, for the derived perspective.