Quasi-Coherent Sheaves on Algebraic Spaces
The theory of quasi-coherent sheaves on algebraic spaces is developed using the Γ©tale topology, since algebraic spaces do not have a Zariski topology with the same good properties as schemes. A quasi-coherent sheaf on an algebraic space is essentially a quasi-coherent sheaf on an Γ©tale atlas , equipped with descent data along the equivalence relation .
1. Sheaves on the Γtale Site
Let be an algebraic space. The small Γ©tale site is the category whose objects are Γ©tale morphisms with a scheme, and whose coverings are jointly surjective families of Γ©tale morphisms.
An abelian sheaf on is a contravariant functor from to abelian groups satisfying the sheaf condition: for every Γ©tale covering in , the sequence
is exact.
The structure sheaf on is defined by for each Γ©tale .
2. Quasi-Coherent Sheaves
A sheaf of -modules on is quasi-coherent if for every Γ©tale morphism in , the natural map
is an isomorphism. We denote the category of quasi-coherent sheaves by .
Equivalently, using an Γ©tale presentation of :
A quasi-coherent sheaf on is a pair where:
- is a quasi-coherent sheaf on , and
- is an isomorphism of sheaves on , satisfying the cocycle condition: on , the composite
where is the composition in the groupoid, and the unit condition: where is the identity section.
3. Coherent Sheaves
Let be a locally noetherian algebraic space. A quasi-coherent sheaf on is coherent if for some (hence every) Γ©tale atlas , the pullback is a coherent sheaf on .
We denote the category of coherent sheaves by .
Let be a quasi-separated algebraic space. Then:
- is an abelian category.
- is a Grothendieck abelian category (it has a generator and filtered colimits are exact).
- If is noetherian, is an abelian subcategory of , and every quasi-coherent sheaf is a filtered colimit of coherent subsheaves.
4. Examples of Quasi-Coherent Sheaves
The structure sheaf is a quasi-coherent sheaf on any algebraic space . In the descent-data formulation with presentation , it corresponds to where is the canonical isomorphism.
Let be a closed immersion of algebraic spaces. The ideal sheaf is a quasi-coherent sheaf. On an atlas , it restricts to the ideal sheaf of .
Let be a morphism of algebraic spaces and . The pullback is defined by choosing atlases and using the pullback on schemes. Concretely, if and are atlases with lifting to , then with appropriate descent data.
For a quasi-compact quasi-separated morphism , the pushforward of a quasi-coherent sheaf on is quasi-coherent on . This is computed via: for Γ©tale , we have , using the global sections of on the algebraic space .
Let where is a finite group acting freely on a scheme . A line bundle on corresponds to a -linearized line bundle on : a line bundle on together with isomorphisms for each , satisfying the cocycle condition. The Picard group fits in an exact sequence .
A quasi-coherent sheaf on is locally free of rank if is locally free of rank for some Γ©tale atlas . Vector bundles on correspond to locally free sheaves, just as for schemes.
For a smooth algebraic space of dimension over a field , the sheaf of KΓ€hler differentials is a locally free sheaf of rank . On an atlas , it restricts to , with descent data coming from the Γ©tale equivalence relation.
Let be a closed point of an algebraic space over a field , with residue field . The skyscraper sheaf (where ) is a coherent sheaf on supported at .
Let where the action is (restricted to for freeness). A quasi-coherent sheaf on is a -module with an isomorphism satisfying the cocycle condition. This is the same as a module over the invariant ring where .
For , the tensor product is quasi-coherent. When is of finite presentation, is also quasi-coherent. These operations are computed on any atlas and then descended.
A quasi-coherent sheaf on is flat if is flat over for some (hence any) atlas . Flatness is an Γ©tale-local property. For a morphism of algebraic spaces, is -flat if the stalks are flat over the corresponding local rings of .
For a proper Cohen-Macaulay algebraic space of pure dimension over a field , the dualizing sheaf is a coherent sheaf that represents the functor on coherent sheaves. It exists as a consequence of Grothendieck duality for algebraic spaces.
5. Descent and Effectivity
The key theorem underlying the theory of quasi-coherent sheaves on algebraic spaces is:
Let be an Γ©tale surjection from a scheme to an algebraic space . Then the pullback functor
is an equivalence of categories, where is the category of quasi-coherent sheaves on with descent data relative to .
This follows from faithfully flat descent for quasi-coherent sheaves (since Γ©tale morphisms are flat) combined with the fact that Γ©tale descent is effective for quasi-coherent sheaves. Given descent data on , the descended sheaf on is the equalizer of in an appropriate sense. The cocycle condition ensures this construction gives a well-defined quasi-coherent sheaf on .
6. Global Sections and Cohomology
For a quasi-coherent sheaf on an algebraic space , the global sections are
computed as sections of on the final object of .
For a quasi-compact quasi-separated algebraic space with atlas and , the global sections can be computed as the equalizer:
Higher cohomology is computed using the Γ©tale topology:
Let be a quasi-compact quasi-separated algebraic space with atlas . For , the Γ©tale cohomology can be computed using the Cech complex associated to :
7. The Derived Category
For a quasi-compact quasi-separated algebraic space , the derived category is the full subcategory of consisting of complexes with quasi-coherent cohomology sheaves.
For quasi-compact and quasi-separated:
- is a compactly generated triangulated category.
- If is noetherian, the compact objects in are the perfect complexes.
- The natural functor is an equivalence.
8. Comparison with Scheme Theory
If is a scheme, then . That is, quasi-coherent sheaves on the Γ©tale site of a scheme are the same as quasi-coherent sheaves on the Zariski site.
This comparison theorem ensures that the theory of quasi-coherent sheaves on algebraic spaces is a genuine generalization of the theory on schemes, with no unexpected discrepancies for the scheme case.
For , we have . A quasi-coherent sheaf on the Γ©tale site is determined by its value on the affine scheme, which is just an -module.
9. Picard Group and Line Bundles
The Picard group of an algebraic space is the group of isomorphism classes of invertible sheaves (line bundles) on , with the tensor product as group operation.
For algebraic spaces that are not schemes, may behave differently than expected. In particular, an algebraic space need not admit any non-trivial line bundle. The non-existence of ample line bundles is precisely what prevents certain algebraic spaces from being schemes.
References
- The Stacks Project, Tag 03LG: Cohomology of Algebraic Spaces.
- D. Knutson, Algebraic Spaces, LNM 203, Chapter IV.
- B. Conrad, Cohomological Descent, notes available online.
- J. Lurie, Derived Algebraic Geometry, for the derived perspective.