Algebraic Spaces
Algebraic spaces were introduced by Michael Artin in the late 1960s as a natural generalization of schemes. They arise when one takes quotients of schemes by étale equivalence relations — a construction that does not always remain in the category of schemes. Algebraic spaces form an intermediate category between schemes and algebraic stacks, and they appear naturally in moduli problems where a fine moduli scheme fails to exist but a coarse moduli space does.
1. Motivation: Beyond Schemes
Many natural constructions in algebraic geometry produce objects that are not schemes. For instance, if is a finite group acting freely on a scheme , the quotient may not exist as a scheme but always exists as an algebraic space. This motivates the need for a broader category.
The key insight is to work with the étale topology rather than the Zariski topology. In the étale topology, representable functors are sheaves, and algebraic spaces are certain sheaves that are "close to" being representable.
2. The Étale Site
Let be a scheme. The big étale site is the category of -schemes equipped with the étale topology, where coverings are families of étale morphisms such that is surjective.
A presheaf is a sheaf for the étale topology if for every étale covering , the diagram
is an equalizer.
3. Definition of Algebraic Spaces
An algebraic space over a scheme is a functor such that:
- is a sheaf for the étale topology on .
- The diagonal is representable by schemes.
- There exists a scheme and a surjective étale morphism (an étale atlas).
Condition (2) ensures that for any scheme and any two morphisms , the fiber product is a scheme. This means the "overlap" data is always schematic.
Condition (3) says that is locally (in the étale topology) a scheme.
Every scheme is an algebraic space: the functor of points satisfies all three conditions, with as the atlas.
4. Equivalent Formulation via Equivalence Relations
An algebraic space can equivalently be described as a quotient sheaf where is an étale equivalence relation on a scheme . We will develop this perspective in detail in the next section on étale equivalence relations.
An étale presentation of an algebraic space is a pair where is a scheme with an étale surjection and is the equivalence relation, with both projections being étale.
5. Morphisms of Algebraic Spaces
A morphism of algebraic spaces over is simply a natural transformation of functors. Since algebraic spaces are sheaves on the big étale site, the category of algebraic spaces over is a full subcategory of the category of sheaves.
A morphism of algebraic spaces is representable (by schemes) if for every scheme and morphism , the fiber product is a scheme.
For a representable morphism, we can define properties such as being étale, smooth, flat, proper, etc., by requiring that the base change has the corresponding property for all .
6. Examples
Every scheme over defines an algebraic space via its functor of points . The identity is an étale atlas. This embedding is fully faithful.
Let be a scheme and a finite group acting freely on (i.e., the map given by is a closed immersion). Define with and . Then is an étale equivalence relation, and the quotient is an algebraic space. When the action is not free, one must use algebraic stacks instead.
Consider and the equivalence relation that identifies the two copies away from the origin: with appropriate source and target maps. The resulting algebraic space is the "line with doubled origin," which is an algebraic space but not a separated one. Indeed, it is also a scheme — a non-separated one.
Let and acting by . The quotient exists as a scheme . This is a quadric cone, and in this case the algebraic space is actually a scheme.
Let be an algebraically closed field and let be an abelian surface over . Let be the involution . The fixed locus consists of the 16 two-torsion points. Let and . Since acts freely on (the other 15 fixed points being blown up), is an algebraic space. However, for suitable choices, one can arrange that this quotient is an algebraic space not isomorphic to any scheme.
Hironaka constructed a smooth proper threefold over with a free -action such that the quotient is a proper smooth algebraic space that is not a scheme. This is one of the classical examples demonstrating the necessity of algebraic spaces. The key point is that is a proper variety, but the quotient, while proper as an algebraic space, does not admit an ample line bundle, and therefore is not projective and indeed not a scheme.
If is an algebraic space admitting an étale atlas with affine, and if is quasi-separated, then is actually an affine scheme. More generally, every quasi-separated algebraic space that is affine over a scheme is itself a scheme.
Consider a scheme and an étale cover with a descent datum for quasi-coherent sheaves that is effective. Now consider the moduli functor that parametrizes descent data. When descent fails to be effective (in the Zariski topology), the resulting functor may be an algebraic space rather than a scheme, witnessing the strictly larger scope of the étale topology.
For certain moduli problems, the Hilbert functor is representable by a scheme (by Grothendieck's theorem). However, relative Hilbert functors for algebraic spaces, where is an algebraic space over , exist as algebraic spaces. This generalization is due to Artin.
Over , let be a smooth scheme and a finite group acting properly on . By GAGA-type results, if the quotient is algebraizable, it carries the structure of an algebraic space. The passage from analytic to algebraic often forces one to work with algebraic spaces rather than schemes.
Let be a scheme, an -scheme, and an étale group scheme acting freely on . Then the fppf quotient sheaf is an algebraic space over . When is a constant finite group, this recovers the earlier example.
Let be a finite separable field extension, and let be a scheme over . The Weil restriction is defined as the functor . When is quasi-projective, is a scheme. For more general , the Weil restriction exists as an algebraic space over .
The moduli stack of smooth curves of genus is a smooth proper Deligne-Mumford stack. Its coarse moduli space is an algebraic space (and in fact a quasi-projective scheme by the Keel-Mori theorem combined with results on ampleness). For with level structure, similar constructions produce algebraic spaces.
7. Comparison with Schemes
The relationship between schemes and algebraic spaces can be summarized as follows:
| Property | Schemes | Algebraic Spaces | |----------|---------|------------------| | Local model | Affine schemes | Schemes (via étale atlas) | | Topology used | Zariski | Étale | | Points | | Geometric points modulo equivalence | | Ample line bundles | May exist | May not exist | | Quotients by free finite groups | May fail | Always exist |
The functor is fully faithful. An algebraic space is a scheme if and only if there exists a Zariski open covering where each is an affine scheme.
8. Points of an Algebraic Space
A point of an algebraic space is an equivalence class of morphisms where is a field, under the equivalence relation generated by: is equivalent to if there exists a common field extension and making the diagram commute.
The set of points carries a natural topology: a subset is closed if and only if is closed for some (equivalently, any) étale atlas .
Unlike schemes, the topological space of an algebraic space may not be sober (i.e., not every irreducible closed subset need have a unique generic point). However, if is quasi-separated, then is sober.
9. The Diagonal and Quasi-Separatedness
The representability of the diagonal is part of the definition. The diagonal encodes how "overlaps" in an algebraic space behave.
An algebraic space over is quasi-separated if the diagonal is quasi-compact. It is separated if is a closed immersion.
Most algebraic spaces encountered in practice are quasi-separated. The quasi-separated hypothesis is important for many foundational results, including the comparison between the étale and Zariski topologies.
10. Algebraic Spaces and Stacks
Algebraic spaces sit naturally in the hierarchy:
An algebraic space is the same thing as a Deligne-Mumford stack with trivial automorphism groups. Equivalently, an algebraic space is a DM stack such that the inertia stack is the identity.
This perspective is extremely useful: results proven for DM stacks immediately specialize to algebraic spaces, and many techniques (such as the Keel-Mori theorem) go in the reverse direction, producing algebraic spaces from DM stacks.
References
- M. Artin, Algebraic Spaces, Yale Mathematical Monographs, 1971.
- D. Knutson, Algebraic Spaces, Lecture Notes in Mathematics 203, Springer, 1971.
- The Stacks Project, Part: Algebraic Spaces.
- G. Laumon and L. Moret-Bailly, Champs algébriques, Springer, 2000.