ConceptComplete

Morphisms of Varieties

Having defined affine and projective varieties, we now study the maps between them. The notion of morphism is the algebraic geometer's replacement for "continuous map" or "differentiable map": it captures maps that respect the polynomial structure. Throughout, kk denotes an algebraically closed field.


Regular functions

The first step is to define what a "polynomial function" on a variety means.

On affine varieties

Definition1.10Regular function on an affine variety

Let YβŠ†AnY \subseteq \mathbb{A}^n be an affine variety. A regular function on YY is the restriction to YY of a polynomial f∈k[x1,…,xn]f \in k[x_1, \ldots, x_n]. Two polynomials f,gf, g define the same regular function on YY if and only if fβˆ’g∈I(Y)f - g \in I(Y).

The ring of all regular functions on YY is the coordinate ring

O(Y)=k[Y]=k[x1,…,xn]/I(Y).\mathcal{O}(Y) = k[Y] = k[x_1, \ldots, x_n] / I(Y).

Since YY is irreducible, I(Y)I(Y) is prime, so k[Y]k[Y] is an integral domain. Its fraction field k(Y)=Frac⁑(k[Y])k(Y) = \operatorname{Frac}(k[Y]) is the function field of YY.

ExampleRegular functions on the affine line

A1\mathbb{A}^1 has coordinate ring k[A1]=k[x]k[\mathbb{A}^1] = k[x]. A regular function on A1\mathbb{A}^1 is simply a polynomial f(x)∈k[x]f(x) \in k[x]. Rational functions like 1/x1/x are not regular on all of A1\mathbb{A}^1 (they are undefined at x=0x = 0), but 1/x1/x is regular on the open set D(x)=A1βˆ–{0}D(x) = \mathbb{A}^1 \setminus \{0\}.

ExampleRegular functions on a plane curve

Let Y=V(y2βˆ’x3+x)βŠ†A2Y = V(y^2 - x^3 + x) \subseteq \mathbb{A}^2 be the affine part of the elliptic curve y2=x3βˆ’xy^2 = x^3 - x. Then

k[Y]=k[x,y]/(y2βˆ’x3+x).k[Y] = k[x,y]/(y^2 - x^3 + x).

Every element of k[Y]k[Y] can be written uniquely as f(x)+g(x)yf(x) + g(x) y where f,g∈k[x]f, g \in k[x], since y2=x3βˆ’xy^2 = x^3 - x allows reducing the power of yy. For instance, y3=yβ‹…y2=y(x3βˆ’x)=x3yβˆ’xyy^3 = y \cdot y^2 = y(x^3 - x) = x^3 y - xy in k[Y]k[Y].

On projective varieties

Definition1.11Regular function on a projective variety

Let YβŠ†PnY \subseteq \mathbb{P}^n be a projective variety and let P∈YP \in Y. A function f:Uβ†’kf: U \to k defined on an open neighborhood UU of PP is regular at PP if there exist homogeneous polynomials g,h∈k[x0,…,xn]g, h \in k[x_0, \ldots, x_n] of the same degree with h(P)β‰ 0h(P) \neq 0 and f=g/hf = g/h on U∩D(h)U \cap D(h).

A function is regular on an open set UU if it is regular at every point of UU. The ring of regular functions on UU is denoted O(U)\mathcal{O}(U) or OY(U)\mathcal{O}_Y(U).

Theorem1.2Global regular functions on projective varieties

Let YβŠ†PnY \subseteq \mathbb{P}^n be a connected projective variety. Then every regular function f∈O(Y)f \in \mathcal{O}(Y) is constant:

O(Y)=k.\mathcal{O}(Y) = k.

Proof

Since YY is projective, it is complete (i.e., the image of YY under any morphism to an affine variety is closed). The regular function f:Yβ†’A1βŠ†P1f: Y \to \mathbb{A}^1 \subseteq \mathbb{P}^1 has image f(Y)f(Y) that is both closed (by completeness) and contained in A1\mathbb{A}^1. Since YY is irreducible, f(Y)f(Y) is irreducible and closed in A1\mathbb{A}^1. If ff were nonconstant, f(Y)f(Y) would be an irreducible closed subset of A1\mathbb{A}^1 of dimension β‰₯1\geq 1, hence f(Y)=A1f(Y) = \mathbb{A}^1. But f(Y)f(Y) is also the image of a projective variety under projection, and the image of a complete variety under any morphism is closed, so f(Y)f(Y) is closed in P1\mathbb{P}^1, i.e., f(Y)f(Y) is also a projective subset of A1\mathbb{A}^1, which forces f(Y)f(Y) to be a finite set. Contradiction unless ff is constant.

Alternatively, one can argue directly: cover YY by affine opens Ui=Y∩D(xi)U_i = Y \cap D(x_i). On each UiU_i, ff restricts to a regular function. Write f=gi/xidf = g_i/x_i^d for some homogeneous gig_i of degree dd on UiU_i. The compatibility conditions force gixjd=gjxidg_i x_j^d = g_j x_i^d, which (combined with the fact that k[x0,…,xn]k[x_0,\ldots,x_n] is a UFD) forces gi=cβ‹…xidg_i = c \cdot x_i^d for some constant c∈kc \in k, giving f=cf = c.

β– 
ExampleNo nonconstant regular functions on P^n

Consider P1\mathbb{P}^1. A rational function g(x0,x1)/h(x0,x1)g(x_0,x_1)/h(x_0,x_1) with g,hg, h homogeneous of the same degree dd defines a "function" P1β†’k\mathbb{P}^1 \to k, but it has poles where h=0h = 0. The only way to avoid all poles on P1\mathbb{P}^1 is if hh divides gg in the homogeneous coordinate ring, giving a constant. For instance, x0/x1x_0/x_1 is regular on D(x1)D(x_1) but has a pole at [1:0][1:0]. There is no nonconstant regular function defined on all of P1\mathbb{P}^1.

RemarkThe meaning of completeness

The theorem O(Pn)=k\mathcal{O}(\mathbb{P}^n) = k is the algebraic analogue of a fundamental fact in complex analysis: every holomorphic function on a compact complex manifold is constant (by the maximum modulus principle). A projective variety is "compact" in the Zariski sense, and this forces the global regular functions to collapse.

This is precisely why we need morphisms rather than just regular functions: the interesting maps between projective varieties cannot be captured by their rings of global functions.


Morphisms of affine varieties

Definition1.12Morphism of affine varieties

Let XβŠ†AmX \subseteq \mathbb{A}^m and YβŠ†AnY \subseteq \mathbb{A}^n be affine varieties. A morphism (or regular map) Ο†:Xβ†’Y\varphi: X \to Y is a map of the form

Ο†(P)=(f1(P),…,fn(P))\varphi(P) = (f_1(P), \ldots, f_n(P))

where each fi∈k[X]f_i \in k[X] is a regular function on XX. Equivalently, Ο†\varphi is the restriction to XX of a polynomial map Amβ†’An\mathbb{A}^m \to \mathbb{A}^n whose image lands in YY.

Theorem1.3Morphisms ↔ k-algebra homomorphisms (antiequivalence)

There is a natural bijection

Mor⁑(X,Y)β€…β€Šβ†’β€…β€ŠβˆΌβ€…β€Šβ€…β€ŠHom⁑k-alg(k[Y], k[X])\operatorname{Mor}(X, Y) \;\xrightarrow{\;\sim\;}\; \operatorname{Hom}_{k\text{-alg}}(k[Y],\, k[X])

sending a morphism Ο†:Xβ†’Y\varphi: X \to Y to its pullback Ο†βˆ—:k[Y]β†’k[X]\varphi^*: k[Y] \to k[X] defined by Ο†βˆ—(g)=gβˆ˜Ο†\varphi^*(g) = g \circ \varphi.

Consequently, the category of affine varieties over kk with morphisms is anti-equivalent (contravariantly equivalent) to the category of finitely generated reduced kk-algebras that are integral domains:

AffVarkopβ€…β€Šβ‰ƒβ€…β€ŠFGDomk.\mathbf{AffVar}_k^{\mathrm{op}} \;\simeq\; \mathbf{FGDom}_k.

An isomorphism X≅YX \cong Y of affine varieties corresponds to an isomorphism k[X]≅k[Y]k[X] \cong k[Y] of kk-algebras.

Proof

The map Ο†β†¦Ο†βˆ—\varphi \mapsto \varphi^* is well-defined: if Ο†=(f1,…,fn)\varphi = (f_1, \ldots, f_n), then for g=gΛ‰(y1,…,yn)∈k[Y]g = \bar{g}(y_1,\ldots,y_n) \in k[Y], we have Ο†βˆ—(g)(P)=g(Ο†(P))=gΛ‰(f1(P),…,fn(P))∈k[X]\varphi^*(g)(P) = g(\varphi(P)) = \bar{g}(f_1(P),\ldots,f_n(P)) \in k[X].

Conversely, given a kk-algebra homomorphism Ξ±:k[Y]β†’k[X]\alpha: k[Y] \to k[X], write k[Y]=k[y1,…,yn]/I(Y)k[Y] = k[y_1,\ldots,y_n]/I(Y) and set fi=Ξ±(yΛ‰i)∈k[X]f_i = \alpha(\bar{y}_i) \in k[X]. Define Ο†(P)=(f1(P),…,fn(P))\varphi(P) = (f_1(P), \ldots, f_n(P)). For any g∈I(Y)g \in I(Y), we have Ξ±(gΛ‰)=0\alpha(\bar{g}) = 0 in k[X]k[X], so g(f1(P),…,fn(P))=0g(f_1(P),\ldots,f_n(P)) = 0 for all P∈XP \in X, meaning Ο†(P)∈Y\varphi(P) \in Y.

These two constructions are inverse to each other, establishing the bijection.

β– 
ExampleParametrization of the parabola

The morphism Ο†:A1β†’Y=V(yβˆ’x2)βŠ†A2\varphi: \mathbb{A}^1 \to Y = V(y - x^2) \subseteq \mathbb{A}^2 given by t↦(t,t2)t \mapsto (t, t^2) corresponds to the kk-algebra homomorphism

Ο†βˆ—:k[Y]=k[x,y]/(yβˆ’x2)β†’k[t],x↦t,β€…β€Šy↦t2.\varphi^*: k[Y] = k[x,y]/(y - x^2) \to k[t], \quad x \mapsto t, \; y \mapsto t^2.

This is an isomorphism of kk-algebras (since k[Y]β‰…k[x]k[Y] \cong k[x] via y↦x2y \mapsto x^2), confirming that Ο†\varphi is an isomorphism of varieties.

ExampleProjection maps

Let Y=V(y2βˆ’x3+x)βŠ†A2Y = V(y^2 - x^3 + x) \subseteq \mathbb{A}^2 be the affine elliptic curve. The projection to the first coordinate

Ο€:Yβ†’A1,(x,y)↦x\pi: Y \to \mathbb{A}^1, \quad (x, y) \mapsto x

is a morphism. The corresponding pullback is Ο€βˆ—:k[t]β†’k[Y]\pi^*: k[t] \to k[Y], t↦xΛ‰t \mapsto \bar{x}. This is injective (so Ο€\pi is dominant), and the extension k[t]β†ͺk[x,y]/(y2βˆ’x3+x)k[t] \hookrightarrow k[x,y]/(y^2 - x^3 + x) is integral of degree 2: generically, each fiber Ο€βˆ’1(a)={(a,y):y2=a3βˆ’a}\pi^{-1}(a) = \{(a, y) : y^2 = a^3 - a\} consists of 2 points (the two square roots), unless a3βˆ’a=0a^3 - a = 0 (i.e., a=0,Β±1a = 0, \pm 1), where the fiber is a single point.

ExampleInclusion of a subvariety

Let YβŠ†XY \subseteq X be a closed subvariety (e.g., Y=V(y)βŠ†X=A2Y = V(y) \subseteq X = \mathbb{A}^2). The inclusion ΞΉ:Yβ†ͺX\iota: Y \hookrightarrow X is a morphism, and the pullback ΞΉβˆ—:k[X]β†’k[Y]\iota^*: k[X] \to k[Y] is the surjection k[X]β† k[X]/I(Y)=k[Y]k[X] \twoheadrightarrow k[X]/I(Y) = k[Y]. Closed immersions correspond to surjective kk-algebra maps; open immersions correspond to localizations.

ExampleMorphisms to A^1 are regular functions

A morphism Ο†:Xβ†’A1\varphi: X \to \mathbb{A}^1 is the same data as a single regular function f=Ο†βˆˆk[X]f = \varphi \in k[X]: the pullback Ο†βˆ—:k[t]β†’k[X]\varphi^*: k[t] \to k[X] sends t↦ft \mapsto f. More generally, a morphism Xβ†’AnX \to \mathbb{A}^n is exactly an nn-tuple of regular functions (f1,…,fn)∈k[X]n(f_1, \ldots, f_n) \in k[X]^n, reproducing Definition 1.12.


Morphisms of projective varieties

Definition1.13Morphism of projective varieties

Let XβŠ†PmX \subseteq \mathbb{P}^m and YβŠ†PnY \subseteq \mathbb{P}^n be projective varieties. A morphism Ο†:Xβ†’Y\varphi: X \to Y is a map such that for every P∈XP \in X, there exist homogeneous polynomials f0,…,fn∈k[x0,…,xm]f_0, \ldots, f_n \in k[x_0, \ldots, x_m] of the same degree with

Ο†(P)=[f0(P):β‹―:fn(P)]\varphi(P) = [f_0(P) : \cdots : f_n(P)]

and the fif_i do not all vanish at PP. (The choice of fif_i may need to vary on different open subsets covering XX; the condition is that such a local representation exists in a neighborhood of each point.)

RemarkLocal nature of morphisms

Unlike in affine geometry, projective morphisms often cannot be described by a single formula valid everywhere. One typically covers XX by open sets on each of which the morphism has a polynomial description, and checks compatibility on overlaps. This local nature is a precursor to the language of sheaves and schemes.

ExampleThe Veronese embedding as a morphism

The degree-dd Veronese embedding is the morphism

Ξ½d:Pnβ†’PN,[x0:β‹―:xn]↦[β‹―:x0i0β‹―xnin:⋯ ]i0+β‹―+in=d\nu_d: \mathbb{P}^n \to \mathbb{P}^N, \quad [x_0:\cdots:x_n] \mapsto [\cdots : x_0^{i_0}\cdots x_n^{i_n} : \cdots]_{i_0+\cdots+i_n=d}

where N=(n+dd)βˆ’1N = \binom{n+d}{d} - 1. All component polynomials are monomials of degree dd, so they are homogeneous of the same degree. At any point P∈PnP \in \mathbb{P}^n, at least one coordinate xjβ‰ 0x_j \neq 0, so the monomial xjdβ‰ 0x_j^d \neq 0, ensuring the map is well-defined everywhere.

For n=1n = 1, d=2d = 2: Ξ½2:P1β†’P2\nu_2: \mathbb{P}^1 \to \mathbb{P}^2, [s:t]↦[s2:st:t2][s:t] \mapsto [s^2 : st : t^2]. The image is the conic V(xzβˆ’y2)V(xz - y^2), and Ξ½2\nu_2 is an isomorphism onto its image.

For n=1n = 1, d=3d = 3: Ξ½3:P1β†’P3\nu_3: \mathbb{P}^1 \to \mathbb{P}^3, [s:t]↦[s3:s2t:st2:t3][s:t] \mapsto [s^3 : s^2 t : st^2 : t^3]. The image is the twisted cubic curve in P3\mathbb{P}^3, defined by the 2Γ—22 \times 2 minors of (x0x1x2x1x2x3)\begin{pmatrix} x_0 & x_1 & x_2 \\ x_1 & x_2 & x_3 \end{pmatrix}.

ExampleThe Segre embedding as a morphism

The Segre embedding is the morphism

Οƒ:PmΓ—Pnβ†’P(m+1)(n+1)βˆ’1,([xi],[yj])↦[xiyj]i,j.\sigma: \mathbb{P}^m \times \mathbb{P}^n \to \mathbb{P}^{(m+1)(n+1)-1}, \quad ([x_i], [y_j]) \mapsto [x_i y_j]_{i,j}.

For m=n=1m = n = 1: Οƒ([s:t],[u:v])=[su:sv:tu:tv]\sigma([s:t],[u:v]) = [su : sv : tu : tv]. The image is V(z0z3βˆ’z1z2)βŠ†P3V(z_0 z_3 - z_1 z_2) \subseteq \mathbb{P}^3, the smooth quadric surface.

The Segre map is well-defined: at least one xi≠0x_i \neq 0 and one yj≠0y_j \neq 0, so xiyj≠0x_i y_j \neq 0. It is an isomorphism onto its image, making Pm×Pn\mathbb{P}^m \times \mathbb{P}^n a projective variety. This is how we give the product of projective varieties the structure of a projective variety.

ExampleProjection from a point

Let P=[1:0:β‹―:0]∈PnP = [1:0:\cdots:0] \in \mathbb{P}^n and let H=V(x0)β‰…Pnβˆ’1H = V(x_0) \cong \mathbb{P}^{n-1}. The projection from PP is the morphism

Ο€P:Pnβˆ–{P}β†’Pnβˆ’1,[x0:x1:β‹―:xn]↦[x1:β‹―:xn].\pi_P: \mathbb{P}^n \setminus \{P\} \to \mathbb{P}^{n-1}, \quad [x_0:x_1:\cdots:x_n] \mapsto [x_1:\cdots:x_n].

This is well-defined: if Qβ‰ PQ \neq P, then not all of x1,…,xnx_1,\ldots,x_n are zero. Geometrically, Ο€P\pi_P sends QQ to the intersection of the line PQβ€Ύ\overline{PQ} with the hyperplane HH.

If XβŠ†PnX \subseteq \mathbb{P}^n is a projective variety with Pβˆ‰XP \notin X, then Ο€P∣X:Xβ†’Pnβˆ’1\pi_P|_X: X \to \mathbb{P}^{n-1} is a morphism. This is a fundamental tool: it can be used to show that every projective variety of dimension dd admits a finite surjective morphism to Pd\mathbb{P}^d (Noether normalization, geometric form).


The category of varieties

Definition1.14(Quasi-projective) variety

A quasi-projective variety is a locally closed subset (= open subset of a closed subset) of some Pn\mathbb{P}^n, with the induced Zariski topology and the induced notion of regular functions. This includes:

  • Affine varieties: closed subsets of An\mathbb{A}^n (since An\mathbb{A}^n is an open subset of Pn\mathbb{P}^n).
  • Projective varieties: closed subsets of Pn\mathbb{P}^n.
  • Quasi-affine varieties: open subsets of affine varieties (e.g., Anβˆ–V(f)\mathbb{A}^n \setminus V(f)).

A morphism Ο†:Xβ†’Y\varphi: X \to Y between quasi-projective varieties is a continuous map (in the Zariski topology) such that for every open UβŠ†YU \subseteq Y and every regular function f∈O(U)f \in \mathcal{O}(U), the pullback fβˆ˜Ο†f \circ \varphi is regular on Ο†βˆ’1(U)\varphi^{-1}(U).

RemarkThe category Var_k

With this definition, varieties over kk form a category Vark\mathbf{Var}_k. Isomorphisms in this category are bijective morphisms whose inverse is also a morphism. This is a subtlety: a bijective morphism is not automatically an isomorphism (see the cusp example below). The category Vark\mathbf{Var}_k is the starting point for algebraic geometry; the passage to Schk\mathbf{Sch}_k (schemes) generalizes this by allowing nilpotents and non-closed points.


Examples of morphisms

ExampleThe Frobenius endomorphism

Let kk be an algebraically closed field of characteristic p>0p > 0 (e.g., k=Fpβ€Ύk = \overline{\mathbb{F}_p}). The Frobenius endomorphism on An\mathbb{A}^n is

Fr⁑:Anβ†’An,(a1,…,an)↦(a1p,…,anp).\operatorname{Fr}: \mathbb{A}^n \to \mathbb{A}^n, \quad (a_1, \ldots, a_n) \mapsto (a_1^p, \ldots, a_n^p).

This is a morphism (each component is a polynomial). The pullback is

Frβ‘βˆ—:k[x1,…,xn]β†’k[x1,…,xn],xi↦xip.\operatorname{Fr}^*: k[x_1,\ldots,x_n] \to k[x_1,\ldots,x_n], \quad x_i \mapsto x_i^p.

On a projective variety XβŠ†PnX \subseteq \mathbb{P}^n defined over Fp\mathbb{F}_p, the Frobenius acts as [a0:β‹―:an]↦[a0p:β‹―:anp][a_0:\cdots:a_n] \mapsto [a_0^p:\cdots:a_n^p]. This is well-defined since (Ξ»ai)p=Ξ»paip({\lambda a_i})^p = \lambda^p a_i^p. The fixed points of Fr⁑\operatorname{Fr} are precisely the Fp\mathbb{F}_p-rational points: X(Fp)=XFr⁑X(\mathbb{F}_p) = X^{\operatorname{Fr}}.

Key properties:

  • Fr⁑\operatorname{Fr} is a bijection on points (since a↦apa \mapsto a^p is bijective on k=Fpβ€Ύk = \overline{\mathbb{F}_p}).
  • Fr⁑\operatorname{Fr} is not an isomorphism: the pullback xi↦xipx_i \mapsto x_i^p is injective but not surjective (xix_i is not in the image).
  • Fr⁑\operatorname{Fr} is a purely inseparable morphism of degree pnp^n.
  • Counting fixed points of iterates Fr⁑r\operatorname{Fr}^r gives ∣X(Fpr)∣|X(\mathbb{F}_{p^r})|, which is the subject of the Weil conjectures.
ExampleThe d-uple embedding

The dd-uple embedding (= Veronese embedding for general nn) sends

ρd:Pnβ†’PN,N=(n+dd)βˆ’1,\rho_d: \mathbb{P}^n \to \mathbb{P}^N, \quad N = \binom{n+d}{d} - 1,

mapping each point to its vector of all degree-dd monomials. For n=2n = 2, d=2d = 2 (the quadratic Veronese):

ρ2:P2β†’P5,[x:y:z]↦[x2:xy:xz:y2:yz:z2].\rho_2: \mathbb{P}^2 \to \mathbb{P}^5, \quad [x:y:z] \mapsto [x^2 : xy : xz : y^2 : yz : z^2].

The image is the Veronese surface V2βŠ†P5V_2 \subseteq \mathbb{P}^5. A line V(ax+by+cz)V(ax + by + cz) in P2\mathbb{P}^2 corresponds to a conic on V2V_2 (a hyperplane section). The key property: ρd\rho_d converts degree-dd hypersurfaces to hyperplane sections.

As a morphism, ρd\rho_d is an isomorphism onto its image. The inverse is obtained by noting that the image lies in a linear subspace where the coordinate ratios recover the original coordinates.

ExampleNormalization of the cuspidal cubic

The cuspidal cubic Y=V(y2βˆ’x3)βŠ†A2Y = V(y^2 - x^3) \subseteq \mathbb{A}^2 has coordinate ring k[Y]=k[t2,t3]βŠ‚k[t]k[Y] = k[t^2, t^3] \subset k[t]. The normalization is the morphism

Ξ½:A1β†’Y,t↦(t2,t3)\nu: \mathbb{A}^1 \to Y, \quad t \mapsto (t^2, t^3)

corresponding to the inclusion Ξ½βˆ—:k[t2,t3]β†ͺk[t]\nu^*: k[t^2, t^3] \hookrightarrow k[t]. This is a bijection on points but not an isomorphism (the pullback is not surjective: tβˆ‰k[t2,t3]t \notin k[t^2, t^3]).

The normalization "resolves" the cusp: A1\mathbb{A}^1 is smooth, and ν\nu is a birational morphism that is an isomorphism away from the singular point. The preimage of the cusp (0,0)∈Y(0,0) \in Y is the single point 0∈A10 \in \mathbb{A}^1.

ExampleNormalization of the nodal cubic

The nodal cubic Y=V(y2βˆ’x2(x+1))βŠ†A2Y = V(y^2 - x^2(x+1)) \subseteq \mathbb{A}^2 has a node at the origin. The normalization is

Ξ½:A1β†’Y,t↦(t2βˆ’1,β€…β€Št(t2βˆ’1)).\nu: \mathbb{A}^1 \to Y, \quad t \mapsto (t^2 - 1, \; t(t^2 - 1)).

This corresponds to Ξ½βˆ—:k[Y]=k[x,y]/(y2βˆ’x2(x+1))β†ͺk[t]\nu^*: k[Y] = k[x,y]/(y^2 - x^2(x+1)) \hookrightarrow k[t] via x↦t2βˆ’1x \mapsto t^2 - 1, y↦t3βˆ’ty \mapsto t^3 - t.

Unlike the cusp, the normalization of the node is not bijective: the two points t=1t = 1 and t=βˆ’1t = -1 both map to the node (0,0)∈Y(0, 0) \in Y. The node has two distinct tangent directions, and the normalization "separates" them into two points on A1\mathbb{A}^1.

ExampleParametrization of the rational normal curve

The rational normal curve of degree dd is the image of

Ο†:P1β†’Pd,[s:t]↦[sd:sdβˆ’1t:β‹―:stdβˆ’1:td].\varphi: \mathbb{P}^1 \to \mathbb{P}^d, \quad [s:t] \mapsto [s^d : s^{d-1}t : \cdots : st^{d-1} : t^d].

This is the dd-uple embedding of P1\mathbb{P}^1. For d=3d = 3, the image CβŠ†P3C \subseteq \mathbb{P}^3 is the twisted cubic, defined by

rank⁑(x0x1x2x1x2x3)≀1.\operatorname{rank} \begin{pmatrix} x_0 & x_1 & x_2 \\ x_1 & x_2 & x_3 \end{pmatrix} \leq 1.

The morphism Ο†\varphi is an isomorphism onto CC: the inverse on the chart x0β‰ 0x_0 \neq 0 is [x0:x1:x2:x3]↦[x0:x1][x_0:x_1:x_2:x_3] \mapsto [x_0:x_1], and on x3β‰ 0x_3 \neq 0 it is [x0:x1:x2:x3]↦[x2:x3][x_0:x_1:x_2:x_3] \mapsto [x_2:x_3].


Isomorphisms vs. bijective morphisms

A critical subtlety in algebraic geometry is that a bijective morphism need not be an isomorphism. The Zariski topology is too coarse for a "bijective continuous map with continuous inverse" argument to work.

Theorem1.4Bijective β‰  isomorphism

A morphism Ο†:Xβ†’Y\varphi: X \to Y of varieties that is bijective on points is not necessarily an isomorphism. For Ο†\varphi to be an isomorphism, one needs Ο†βˆ’1\varphi^{-1} to also be a morphism.

In the affine case, Ο†\varphi is an isomorphism if and only if Ο†βˆ—:k[Y]β†’k[X]\varphi^*: k[Y] \to k[X] is an isomorphism of kk-algebras. A bijective morphism has Ο†βˆ—\varphi^* injective, but it may fail to be surjective.

ExampleThe cusp: bijective but not an isomorphism

The morphism Ο†:A1β†’Y=V(y2βˆ’x3)\varphi: \mathbb{A}^1 \to Y = V(y^2 - x^3), t↦(t2,t3)t \mapsto (t^2, t^3) is:

  • Bijective: given (a,b)∈Y(a, b) \in Y with b2=a3b^2 = a^3, if a=0a = 0 then b=0b = 0 and t=0t = 0; if aβ‰ 0a \neq 0 then t=b/at = b/a is the unique preimage.
  • A homeomorphism in the Zariski topology (since any bijective polynomial map between irreducible curves is a homeomorphism).
  • Not an isomorphism: the pullback Ο†βˆ—:k[x,y]/(y2βˆ’x3)β†’k[t]\varphi^*: k[x,y]/(y^2 - x^3) \to k[t] sends x↦t2x \mapsto t^2, y↦t3y \mapsto t^3. The image is k[t2,t3]⊊k[t]k[t^2, t^3] \subsetneq k[t], so Ο†βˆ—\varphi^* is not surjective. Concretely, there is no polynomial in (t2,t3)(t^2, t^3) that equals tt.

The "inverse" would need to send (x,y)↦y/x(x,y) \mapsto y/x, but y/xy/x is not a regular function at the origin (it is a rational function with an indeterminacy). The cusp singularity prevents the inverse from being a morphism.

Lesson: In characteristic 0, a bijective morphism φ:X→Y\varphi: X \to Y with YY normal (e.g., smooth) is an isomorphism (by Zariski's Main Theorem). The failure for the cusp occurs because YY is not normal.

ExampleFrobenius: bijective but not an isomorphism (char p)

In characteristic p>0p > 0, the Frobenius Fr⁑:A1β†’A1\operatorname{Fr}: \mathbb{A}^1 \to \mathbb{A}^1, a↦apa \mapsto a^p is bijective (since kk is algebraically closed), but the pullback Frβ‘βˆ—:k[x]β†’k[x]\operatorname{Fr}^*: k[x] \to k[x], x↦xpx \mapsto x^p is not surjective. So Fr⁑\operatorname{Fr} is bijective but not an isomorphism.

This phenomenon is purely characteristic pp: in characteristic 0, every bijective morphism A1β†’A1\mathbb{A}^1 \to \mathbb{A}^1 is an isomorphism. Over C\mathbb{C}, an endomorphism of A1\mathbb{A}^1 is given by x↦f(x)x \mapsto f(x), and bijectivity forces deg⁑f=1\deg f = 1, i.e., ff is linear.


Automorphisms

Definition1.15Automorphism

An automorphism of a variety XX is an isomorphism Ο†:Xβ†’X\varphi: X \to X. The group of all automorphisms is denoted Aut⁑(X)\operatorname{Aut}(X).

Automorphisms of the affine line

ExampleAut(A^1) = Aff(1, k)

An automorphism Ο†:A1β†’A1\varphi: \mathbb{A}^1 \to \mathbb{A}^1 corresponds to a kk-algebra isomorphism Ο†βˆ—:k[x]β†’k[x]\varphi^*: k[x] \to k[x]. Any such isomorphism sends x↦ax+bx \mapsto ax + b where a∈kβˆ—a \in k^*, b∈kb \in k (since Ο†βˆ—(x)\varphi^*(x) must generate k[x]k[x] and have degree 1). Therefore

Aut⁑(A1)={x↦ax+b∣a∈kβˆ—,b∈k}β‰…Aff⁑(1,k)=kβˆ—β‹‰k.\operatorname{Aut}(\mathbb{A}^1) = \{x \mapsto ax + b \mid a \in k^*, b \in k\} \cong \operatorname{Aff}(1, k) = k^* \ltimes k.

This is the affine group of the line. Higher-degree polynomial maps x↦x+x2x \mapsto x + x^2, while injective over C\mathbb{C}, are not surjective, hence not automorphisms.

ExampleAut(A^n) for n >= 2 (the Jacobian conjecture)

For n=2n = 2, Aut⁑(A2)\operatorname{Aut}(\mathbb{A}^2) is much larger. It contains:

  • Affine maps: (x,y)↦(ax+by+e,cx+dy+f)(x, y) \mapsto (ax + by + e, cx + dy + f) with (abcd)\begin{pmatrix} a & b \\ c & d\end{pmatrix} invertible.
  • Triangular (de Jonquieres) maps: (x,y)↦(ax+p(y),by+c)(x, y) \mapsto (ax + p(y), by + c) with a,b∈kβˆ—a, b \in k^*, p(y)∈k[y]p(y) \in k[y].

By the Jung--van der Kulk theorem, Aut⁑(A2)\operatorname{Aut}(\mathbb{A}^2) is the amalgamated free product of the affine group and the triangular group over their intersection.

For nβ‰₯3n \geq 3, Aut⁑(An)\operatorname{Aut}(\mathbb{A}^n) is not fully understood. The Jacobian conjecture (open, one of Smale's problems) asserts: if Ο†:Anβ†’An\varphi: \mathbb{A}^n \to \mathbb{A}^n has Jacobian determinant det⁑(JΟ†)∈kβˆ—\det(J_\varphi) \in k^* (a nonzero constant), then Ο†\varphi is an automorphism.

Automorphisms of the projective line

ExampleAut(P^1) = PGL(2, k)

An automorphism Ο†:P1β†’P1\varphi: \mathbb{P}^1 \to \mathbb{P}^1 is given by

[x0:x1]↦[ax0+bx1:cx0+dx1],(abcd)∈GL(2,k).[x_0 : x_1] \mapsto [ax_0 + bx_1 : cx_0 + dx_1], \quad \begin{pmatrix} a & b \\ c & d \end{pmatrix} \in GL(2, k).

Two matrices give the same automorphism iff they differ by a scalar, so

Aut⁑(P1)β‰…PGL(2,k)=GL(2,k)/kβˆ—.\operatorname{Aut}(\mathbb{P}^1) \cong PGL(2, k) = GL(2, k) / k^*.

In the affine coordinate t=x1/x0t = x_1/x_0, the automorphism becomes the Mobius transformation

t↦ct+dat+b(orΒ equivalentlyΒ t↦αt+Ξ²Ξ³t+Ξ΄).t \mapsto \frac{ct + d}{at + b} \quad \text{(or equivalently } t \mapsto \frac{\alpha t + \beta}{\gamma t + \delta}\text{)}.

Key properties:

  • dim⁑PGL(2)=3\dim PGL(2) = 3, so automorphisms of P1\mathbb{P}^1 form a 3-dimensional group.
  • PGL(2)PGL(2) acts 3-transitively on P1\mathbb{P}^1: given any three distinct points P1,P2,P3P_1, P_2, P_3 and any other three distinct points Q1,Q2,Q3Q_1, Q_2, Q_3, there is a unique Ο†βˆˆPGL(2)\varphi \in PGL(2) with Ο†(Pi)=Qi\varphi(P_i) = Q_i.
  • For nβ‰₯2n \geq 2: Aut⁑(Pn)=PGL(n+1,k)\operatorname{Aut}(\mathbb{P}^n) = PGL(n+1, k), acting by linear changes of coordinates.

Automorphisms of elliptic curves

ExampleAut(E) for an elliptic curve

Let EE be an elliptic curve over kk with identity O∈EO \in E. An automorphism Ο†:Eβ†’E\varphi: E \to E preserving OO (i.e., Ο†(O)=O\varphi(O) = O) is an automorphism of EE as an abelian variety. The group of such automorphisms is:

  • Generic case (char⁑kβ‰ 2,3\operatorname{char} k \neq 2, 3, and j(E)β‰ 0,1728j(E) \neq 0, 1728): Aut⁑(E,O)={Β±1}β‰…Z/2Z\operatorname{Aut}(E, O) = \{\pm 1\} \cong \mathbb{Z}/2\mathbb{Z}, generated by the negation map Pβ†¦βˆ’PP \mapsto -P (inversion in the group law).

  • j=1728j = 1728 (E:y2=x3βˆ’xE: y^2 = x^3 - x, char kβ‰ 2k \neq 2): Aut⁑(E,O)β‰…Z/4Z\operatorname{Aut}(E, O) \cong \mathbb{Z}/4\mathbb{Z}, generated by (x,y)↦(βˆ’x,iy)(x, y) \mapsto (-x, iy) where i2=βˆ’1i^2 = -1. This is an order-4 automorphism.

  • j=0j = 0 (E:y2=x3βˆ’1E: y^2 = x^3 - 1, char kβ‰ 2,3k \neq 2, 3): Aut⁑(E,O)β‰…Z/6Z\operatorname{Aut}(E, O) \cong \mathbb{Z}/6\mathbb{Z}, generated by (x,y)↦(ΞΆ3x,βˆ’y)(x, y) \mapsto (\zeta_3 x, -y) where ΞΆ3\zeta_3 is a primitive cube root of unity. The order-3 element (x,y)↦(ΞΆ3x,y)(x,y) \mapsto (\zeta_3 x, y) is a "rotation" of the curve.

If we drop the condition Ο†(O)=O\varphi(O) = O, then Aut⁑(E)=Eβ‹ŠAut⁑(E,O)\operatorname{Aut}(E) = E \rtimes \operatorname{Aut}(E, O), where EE acts on itself by translations Ο„Q:P↦P+Q\tau_Q: P \mapsto P + Q. Translations are automorphisms of EE as a variety (but not as a group).


Morphisms as functors: the categorical perspective

RemarkThe antiequivalence in practice

The antiequivalence AffVarkop≃FGDomk\mathbf{AffVar}_k^{\mathrm{op}} \simeq \mathbf{FGDom}_k means that every algebraic statement about coordinate rings translates to a geometric statement about varieties, and vice versa. Here is a dictionary:

| Geometry (varieties) | Algebra (coordinate rings) | |---|---| | Morphism Ο†:Xβ†’Y\varphi: X \to Y | kk-algebra map Ο†βˆ—:k[Y]β†’k[X]\varphi^*: k[Y] \to k[X] | | Isomorphism Xβ‰…YX \cong Y | Ring isomorphism k[X]β‰…k[Y]k[X] \cong k[Y] | | Closed immersion Xβ†ͺYX \hookrightarrow Y | Surjection k[Y]β† k[X]k[Y] \twoheadrightarrow k[X] | | Dominant morphism | Injective ring map k[Y]β†ͺk[X]k[Y] \hookrightarrow k[X] | | XX is a point | k[X]=kk[X] = k | | Product XΓ—YX \times Y | Tensor product k[X]βŠ—kk[Y]k[X] \otimes_k k[Y] | | XX is smooth | k[X]k[X] is a regular ring | | XX is normal | k[X]k[X] is integrally closed | | Finite morphism Xβ†’YX \to Y | k[X]k[X] is a finite k[Y]k[Y]-module |

ExampleUsing the dictionary: is the map X β†’ Y finite?

Let Ο†:Y=V(y2βˆ’x)β†’A1\varphi: Y = V(y^2 - x) \to \mathbb{A}^1 be the projection (x,y)↦x(x, y) \mapsto x. The pullback is Ο†βˆ—:k[t]β†’k[x,y]/(y2βˆ’x)β‰…k[y]\varphi^*: k[t] \to k[x,y]/(y^2 - x) \cong k[y], t↦y2t \mapsto y^2. Is k[y]k[y] a finite k[y2]k[y^2]-module? Yes: k[y]=k[y2]β‹…1+k[y2]β‹…yk[y] = k[y^2] \cdot 1 + k[y^2] \cdot y, so k[y]k[y] is free of rank 2 over k[y2]k[y^2]. Therefore Ο†\varphi is a finite morphism of degree 2. Geometrically, each fiber has at most 2 points: the two square roots of xx.


Summary of key examples

MorphismFormulaPullback / ring mapKey property
Parabola parametrizationt↦(t,t2)t \mapsto (t, t^2)k[x]β†’βˆΌk[t]k[x] \xrightarrow{\sim} k[t]Isomorphism
Cusp normalizationt↦(t2,t3)t \mapsto (t^2, t^3)k[t2,t3]β†ͺk[t]k[t^2,t^3] \hookrightarrow k[t]Bijective, not an isomorphism
Node normalizationt↦(t2βˆ’1,t3βˆ’t)t \mapsto (t^2-1, t^3-t)k[Y]β†ͺk[t]k[Y] \hookrightarrow k[t]Not injective (node is identified)
Elliptic curve projection(x,y)↦x(x,y) \mapsto xk[t]β†ͺk[Y]k[t] \hookrightarrow k[Y], degree 2Finite, 2-to-1 generically
Veronese Ξ½d\nu_d[xi]↦[monomialsΒ degΒ d][x_i] \mapsto [\text{monomials deg } d]Linearizes degree-dd hypersurfacesClosed embedding
Segre Οƒ\sigma([xi],[yj])↦[xiyj]([x_i],[y_j]) \mapsto [x_i y_j]Realizes PmΓ—Pn\mathbb{P}^m \times \mathbb{P}^n as projectiveClosed embedding
Projection from a point[x0:β‹―:xn]↦[x1:β‹―:xn][x_0:\cdots:x_n] \mapsto [x_1:\cdots:x_n]Defined on Pnβˆ–{P}\mathbb{P}^n \setminus \{P\}Rational map from Pn\mathbb{P}^n
Frobenius (char pp)a↦apa \mapsto a^pxi↦xipx_i \mapsto x_i^p, not surjectiveBijective, not an isomorphism
Aut⁑(P1)\operatorname{Aut}(\mathbb{P}^1)Mobius transformationsPGL(2,k)PGL(2,k)3-transitive on points
Aut⁑(E,O)\operatorname{Aut}(E, O)Pβ†¦βˆ’PP \mapsto -P, etc.Z/2\mathbb{Z}/2, Z/4\mathbb{Z}/4, or Z/6\mathbb{Z}/6Depends on jj-invariant
RemarkLooking ahead

Morphisms of varieties are the foundation for the next steps in algebraic geometry:

  • Rational maps generalize morphisms by allowing "indeterminacy loci" where the map is undefined.
  • Dimension can be defined via the transcendence degree of the function field, which is preserved under birational equivalence.
  • Nonsingularity is intimately related to whether the local ring is regular, and normalization morphisms resolve certain singularities.
  • In the language of schemes, morphisms are defined via locally ringed spaces, subsuming all the cases above and extending to non-reduced, non-irreducible, and arithmetic settings.