Morphisms of Varieties
Having defined affine and projective varieties, we now study the maps between them. The notion of morphism is the algebraic geometer's replacement for "continuous map" or "differentiable map": it captures maps that respect the polynomial structure. Throughout, denotes an algebraically closed field.
Regular functions
The first step is to define what a "polynomial function" on a variety means.
On affine varieties
Let be an affine variety. A regular function on is the restriction to of a polynomial . Two polynomials define the same regular function on if and only if .
The ring of all regular functions on is the coordinate ring
Since is irreducible, is prime, so is an integral domain. Its fraction field is the function field of .
has coordinate ring . A regular function on is simply a polynomial . Rational functions like are not regular on all of (they are undefined at ), but is regular on the open set .
Let be the affine part of the elliptic curve . Then
Every element of can be written uniquely as where , since allows reducing the power of . For instance, in .
On projective varieties
Let be a projective variety and let . A function defined on an open neighborhood of is regular at if there exist homogeneous polynomials of the same degree with and on .
A function is regular on an open set if it is regular at every point of . The ring of regular functions on is denoted or .
Let be a connected projective variety. Then every regular function is constant:
Since is projective, it is complete (i.e., the image of under any morphism to an affine variety is closed). The regular function has image that is both closed (by completeness) and contained in . Since is irreducible, is irreducible and closed in . If were nonconstant, would be an irreducible closed subset of of dimension , hence . But is also the image of a projective variety under projection, and the image of a complete variety under any morphism is closed, so is closed in , i.e., is also a projective subset of , which forces to be a finite set. Contradiction unless is constant.
Alternatively, one can argue directly: cover by affine opens . On each , restricts to a regular function. Write for some homogeneous of degree on . The compatibility conditions force , which (combined with the fact that is a UFD) forces for some constant , giving .
Consider . A rational function with homogeneous of the same degree defines a "function" , but it has poles where . The only way to avoid all poles on is if divides in the homogeneous coordinate ring, giving a constant. For instance, is regular on but has a pole at . There is no nonconstant regular function defined on all of .
The theorem is the algebraic analogue of a fundamental fact in complex analysis: every holomorphic function on a compact complex manifold is constant (by the maximum modulus principle). A projective variety is "compact" in the Zariski sense, and this forces the global regular functions to collapse.
This is precisely why we need morphisms rather than just regular functions: the interesting maps between projective varieties cannot be captured by their rings of global functions.
Morphisms of affine varieties
Let and be affine varieties. A morphism (or regular map) is a map of the form
where each is a regular function on . Equivalently, is the restriction to of a polynomial map whose image lands in .
There is a natural bijection
sending a morphism to its pullback defined by .
Consequently, the category of affine varieties over with morphisms is anti-equivalent (contravariantly equivalent) to the category of finitely generated reduced -algebras that are integral domains:
An isomorphism of affine varieties corresponds to an isomorphism of -algebras.
The map is well-defined: if , then for , we have .
Conversely, given a -algebra homomorphism , write and set . Define . For any , we have in , so for all , meaning .
These two constructions are inverse to each other, establishing the bijection.
The morphism given by corresponds to the -algebra homomorphism
This is an isomorphism of -algebras (since via ), confirming that is an isomorphism of varieties.
Let be the affine elliptic curve. The projection to the first coordinate
is a morphism. The corresponding pullback is , . This is injective (so is dominant), and the extension is integral of degree 2: generically, each fiber consists of 2 points (the two square roots), unless (i.e., ), where the fiber is a single point.
Let be a closed subvariety (e.g., ). The inclusion is a morphism, and the pullback is the surjection . Closed immersions correspond to surjective -algebra maps; open immersions correspond to localizations.
A morphism is the same data as a single regular function : the pullback sends . More generally, a morphism is exactly an -tuple of regular functions , reproducing Definition 1.12.
Morphisms of projective varieties
Let and be projective varieties. A morphism is a map such that for every , there exist homogeneous polynomials of the same degree with
and the do not all vanish at . (The choice of may need to vary on different open subsets covering ; the condition is that such a local representation exists in a neighborhood of each point.)
Unlike in affine geometry, projective morphisms often cannot be described by a single formula valid everywhere. One typically covers by open sets on each of which the morphism has a polynomial description, and checks compatibility on overlaps. This local nature is a precursor to the language of sheaves and schemes.
The degree- Veronese embedding is the morphism
where . All component polynomials are monomials of degree , so they are homogeneous of the same degree. At any point , at least one coordinate , so the monomial , ensuring the map is well-defined everywhere.
For , : , . The image is the conic , and is an isomorphism onto its image.
For , : , . The image is the twisted cubic curve in , defined by the minors of .
The Segre embedding is the morphism
For : . The image is , the smooth quadric surface.
The Segre map is well-defined: at least one and one , so . It is an isomorphism onto its image, making a projective variety. This is how we give the product of projective varieties the structure of a projective variety.
Let and let . The projection from is the morphism
This is well-defined: if , then not all of are zero. Geometrically, sends to the intersection of the line with the hyperplane .
If is a projective variety with , then is a morphism. This is a fundamental tool: it can be used to show that every projective variety of dimension admits a finite surjective morphism to (Noether normalization, geometric form).
The category of varieties
A quasi-projective variety is a locally closed subset (= open subset of a closed subset) of some , with the induced Zariski topology and the induced notion of regular functions. This includes:
- Affine varieties: closed subsets of (since is an open subset of ).
- Projective varieties: closed subsets of .
- Quasi-affine varieties: open subsets of affine varieties (e.g., ).
A morphism between quasi-projective varieties is a continuous map (in the Zariski topology) such that for every open and every regular function , the pullback is regular on .
With this definition, varieties over form a category . Isomorphisms in this category are bijective morphisms whose inverse is also a morphism. This is a subtlety: a bijective morphism is not automatically an isomorphism (see the cusp example below). The category is the starting point for algebraic geometry; the passage to (schemes) generalizes this by allowing nilpotents and non-closed points.
Examples of morphisms
Let be an algebraically closed field of characteristic (e.g., ). The Frobenius endomorphism on is
This is a morphism (each component is a polynomial). The pullback is
On a projective variety defined over , the Frobenius acts as . This is well-defined since . The fixed points of are precisely the -rational points: .
Key properties:
- is a bijection on points (since is bijective on ).
- is not an isomorphism: the pullback is injective but not surjective ( is not in the image).
- is a purely inseparable morphism of degree .
- Counting fixed points of iterates gives , which is the subject of the Weil conjectures.
The -uple embedding (= Veronese embedding for general ) sends
mapping each point to its vector of all degree- monomials. For , (the quadratic Veronese):
The image is the Veronese surface . A line in corresponds to a conic on (a hyperplane section). The key property: converts degree- hypersurfaces to hyperplane sections.
As a morphism, is an isomorphism onto its image. The inverse is obtained by noting that the image lies in a linear subspace where the coordinate ratios recover the original coordinates.
The cuspidal cubic has coordinate ring . The normalization is the morphism
corresponding to the inclusion . This is a bijection on points but not an isomorphism (the pullback is not surjective: ).
The normalization "resolves" the cusp: is smooth, and is a birational morphism that is an isomorphism away from the singular point. The preimage of the cusp is the single point .
The nodal cubic has a node at the origin. The normalization is
This corresponds to via , .
Unlike the cusp, the normalization of the node is not bijective: the two points and both map to the node . The node has two distinct tangent directions, and the normalization "separates" them into two points on .
The rational normal curve of degree is the image of
This is the -uple embedding of . For , the image is the twisted cubic, defined by
The morphism is an isomorphism onto : the inverse on the chart is , and on it is .
Isomorphisms vs. bijective morphisms
A critical subtlety in algebraic geometry is that a bijective morphism need not be an isomorphism. The Zariski topology is too coarse for a "bijective continuous map with continuous inverse" argument to work.
A morphism of varieties that is bijective on points is not necessarily an isomorphism. For to be an isomorphism, one needs to also be a morphism.
In the affine case, is an isomorphism if and only if is an isomorphism of -algebras. A bijective morphism has injective, but it may fail to be surjective.
The morphism , is:
- Bijective: given with , if then and ; if then is the unique preimage.
- A homeomorphism in the Zariski topology (since any bijective polynomial map between irreducible curves is a homeomorphism).
- Not an isomorphism: the pullback sends , . The image is , so is not surjective. Concretely, there is no polynomial in that equals .
The "inverse" would need to send , but is not a regular function at the origin (it is a rational function with an indeterminacy). The cusp singularity prevents the inverse from being a morphism.
Lesson: In characteristic 0, a bijective morphism with normal (e.g., smooth) is an isomorphism (by Zariski's Main Theorem). The failure for the cusp occurs because is not normal.
In characteristic , the Frobenius , is bijective (since is algebraically closed), but the pullback , is not surjective. So is bijective but not an isomorphism.
This phenomenon is purely characteristic : in characteristic 0, every bijective morphism is an isomorphism. Over , an endomorphism of is given by , and bijectivity forces , i.e., is linear.
Automorphisms
An automorphism of a variety is an isomorphism . The group of all automorphisms is denoted .
Automorphisms of the affine line
An automorphism corresponds to a -algebra isomorphism . Any such isomorphism sends where , (since must generate and have degree 1). Therefore
This is the affine group of the line. Higher-degree polynomial maps , while injective over , are not surjective, hence not automorphisms.
For , is much larger. It contains:
- Affine maps: with invertible.
- Triangular (de Jonquieres) maps: with , .
By the Jung--van der Kulk theorem, is the amalgamated free product of the affine group and the triangular group over their intersection.
For , is not fully understood. The Jacobian conjecture (open, one of Smale's problems) asserts: if has Jacobian determinant (a nonzero constant), then is an automorphism.
Automorphisms of the projective line
An automorphism is given by
Two matrices give the same automorphism iff they differ by a scalar, so
In the affine coordinate , the automorphism becomes the Mobius transformation
Key properties:
- , so automorphisms of form a 3-dimensional group.
- acts 3-transitively on : given any three distinct points and any other three distinct points , there is a unique with .
- For : , acting by linear changes of coordinates.
Automorphisms of elliptic curves
Let be an elliptic curve over with identity . An automorphism preserving (i.e., ) is an automorphism of as an abelian variety. The group of such automorphisms is:
-
Generic case (, and ): , generated by the negation map (inversion in the group law).
-
(, char ): , generated by where . This is an order-4 automorphism.
-
(, char ): , generated by where is a primitive cube root of unity. The order-3 element is a "rotation" of the curve.
If we drop the condition , then , where acts on itself by translations . Translations are automorphisms of as a variety (but not as a group).
Morphisms as functors: the categorical perspective
The antiequivalence means that every algebraic statement about coordinate rings translates to a geometric statement about varieties, and vice versa. Here is a dictionary:
| Geometry (varieties) | Algebra (coordinate rings) | |---|---| | Morphism | -algebra map | | Isomorphism | Ring isomorphism | | Closed immersion | Surjection | | Dominant morphism | Injective ring map | | is a point | | | Product | Tensor product | | is smooth | is a regular ring | | is normal | is integrally closed | | Finite morphism | is a finite -module |
Let be the projection . The pullback is , . Is a finite -module? Yes: , so is free of rank 2 over . Therefore is a finite morphism of degree 2. Geometrically, each fiber has at most 2 points: the two square roots of .
Summary of key examples
| Morphism | Formula | Pullback / ring map | Key property |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parabola parametrization | Isomorphism | ||
| Cusp normalization | Bijective, not an isomorphism | ||
| Node normalization | Not injective (node is identified) | ||
| Elliptic curve projection | , degree 2 | Finite, 2-to-1 generically | |
| Veronese | Linearizes degree- hypersurfaces | Closed embedding | |
| Segre | Realizes as projective | Closed embedding | |
| Projection from a point | Defined on | Rational map from | |
| Frobenius (char ) | , not surjective | Bijective, not an isomorphism | |
| Mobius transformations | 3-transitive on points | ||
| , etc. | , , or | Depends on -invariant |
Morphisms of varieties are the foundation for the next steps in algebraic geometry:
- Rational maps generalize morphisms by allowing "indeterminacy loci" where the map is undefined.
- Dimension can be defined via the transcendence degree of the function field, which is preserved under birational equivalence.
- Nonsingularity is intimately related to whether the local ring is regular, and normalization morphisms resolve certain singularities.
- In the language of schemes, morphisms are defined via locally ringed spaces, subsuming all the cases above and extending to non-reduced, non-irreducible, and arithmetic settings.