Artin Representability Theorem
Artin's representability theorem provides verifiable criteria for a stack (or functor) to be algebraic. It is the fundamental existence theorem in the theory of algebraic stacks: rather than constructing an atlas explicitly, one checks a list of deformation-theoretic and set-theoretic conditions that together guarantee the existence of a smooth atlas. This theorem underlies the construction of virtually all moduli stacks in algebraic geometry.
Statement
Let be an excellent scheme and let be a category fibered in groupoids over . Suppose that:
-
(Stack axiom) is a stack for the fppf topology.
-
(Limit preservation) is limit-preserving (locally of finite presentation): for any filtered direct system of -algebras, is an equivalence of categories.
-
(Homogeneity / Schlessinger-type conditions) satisfies Schlessinger's conditions (S1) and (S2) (or equivalently, Rim's condition): for every pair of morphisms and of Artinian local -algebras where is surjective, the natural functor is an equivalence of categories.
-
(Effectivity) Formal deformations are effective: for every complete Noetherian local -algebra with , the functor is an equivalence.
-
(Openness of versality) If a morphism is formally smooth at a point , then it is formally smooth in a Zariski neighborhood of .
-
(Deformation and obstruction theory) admits a deformation theory: there exist coherent sheaves (on the relevant base) that control the infinitesimal deformations and obstructions, satisfying the Artin axioms [4.1] through [4.5] of Artin's original paper.
Then is an algebraic stack, locally of finite presentation over .
The conditions fall into three groups:
- Algebraic conditions (1, 2): is an fppf stack of finite presentation.
- Formal conditions (3, 4): The formal local structure is algebraizable.
- Openness condition (5): Versality is open, connecting the formal and algebraic pictures.
In modern formulations (e.g., following Lurie's derived algebraic geometry), conditions (3)--(6) are replaced by the existence of a cotangent complex satisfying finiteness conditions.
Artin's criteria for algebraic spaces
If in the above theorem is a sheaf of sets (rather than a stack), then under the same conditions, is representable by an algebraic space locally of finite presentation over .
More precisely, a functor is an algebraic space if and only if:
- is an fppf sheaf.
- is locally of finite presentation.
- satisfies Schlessinger's conditions.
- Formal objects are effective.
- The formal smoothness locus is open.
The deformation theory input
A deformation theory for a stack over associates to each pair -- where is an object of over a field and is a finite -module -- the following data:
- A deformation space : the set of isomorphism classes of lifts of to (the trivial square-zero extension).
- An obstruction space : obstructions to lifting along surjections with square-zero kernel .
- An automorphism space : infinitesimal automorphisms of over .
These must satisfy:
- They are functorial in and compatible with the cotangent complex.
- There exist coherent sheaves on with , , .
Examples and applications
The Hilbert functor (parametrizing closed subschemes of with Hilbert polynomial ) satisfies Artin's criteria:
- Limit preservation: A closed subscheme of is determined by a closed subscheme of for some (finite presentation of ideals).
- Deformations: (normal sheaf).
- Obstructions: .
- Effectivity: Grothendieck's formal GAGA.
This proves that is an algebraic space -- in fact, a projective scheme (by Grothendieck's original argument using Castelnuovo--Mumford regularity).
The Picard functor (parametrizing line bundles on ) satisfies Artin's criteria:
- Deformations: (first cohomology of the structure sheaf).
- Obstructions: .
- Effectivity: Formal GAGA again.
When (e.g., for curves, or for abelian varieties), the Picard functor is smooth. The result is that is an algebraic space (and a group scheme when is proper with geometrically connected fibers).
The moduli stack satisfies Artin's criteria:
- Deformations of a curve : , where is the tangent sheaf. For , (by Riemann--Roch: and ).
- Obstructions: (since is a curve). So is smooth.
- Automorphisms: for (finite automorphism group no infinitesimal automorphisms).
- Effectivity: Follows from formal GAGA for proper schemes.
This proves is an algebraic stack, smooth of dimension .
Let be a smooth projective curve of genus . For the stack of rank- vector bundles:
- Deformations of : , with .
- Obstructions: (curve!). So is smooth.
- Automorphisms: . For a stable bundle, (Schur's lemma), so and .
The dimension is (as a stack).
For a smooth projective surface and the moduli stack of coherent sheaves with fixed numerical invariants:
- Deformations of : .
- Obstructions: . This is nonzero in general, so the moduli space may be singular.
- By Serre duality, if (K3 or abelian surface), then , and the trace-free obstructions lie in a space of dimension . The expected dimension is by Riemann--Roch.
For proper and separated of finite presentation, the mapping stack (whose -points are morphisms ) is an algebraic stack:
- Deformations of : (sections of the pullback of the tangent bundle).
- Obstructions: .
- The expected dimension is for a curve of genus .
Artin's theorem proves algebraicity. Properness (for the Kontsevich compactification with stable maps) requires additional arguments.
The moduli stack of principally polarized abelian varieties satisfies Artin's criteria:
- Deformations of : , with .
- Obstructions: Unobstructed (the deformation space is smooth), .
- Automorphisms: . For a general ppav, , so .
Hence is a smooth algebraic stack of dimension .
For polarized K3 surfaces of degree :
- Deformations: (by since ). By Hodge theory, .
- Obstructions: (since for K3). So the moduli is unobstructed and smooth of dimension 20.
- The polarization condition cuts out a divisor, giving .
Artin's theorem proves that the moduli of polarized K3 surfaces is an algebraic stack (in fact a DM stack, since is finite).
In derived algebraic geometry, Lurie proved a derived version of Artin representability: a functor (from connective -algebras to spaces) is a derived algebraic stack if and only if:
- is a sheaf for the etale topology.
- is nilcomplete, integrable, and infinitesimally cohesive.
- has a cotangent complex that is connective and almost of finite presentation.
This dramatically simplifies Artin's criteria: the cotangent complex subsumes conditions (3)--(6) of the classical theorem. Many modern constructions of moduli spaces (e.g., derived moduli of perfect complexes, derived mapping stacks) use Lurie's version.
Consider the functor . This is the functor of points of , which is representable by a scheme. But if we modify to (nilpotent of unspecified order), this fails the finite presentation condition (limit preservation) and is not an algebraic space.
The "formal completion functor" (formal deformations without algebraization) satisfies Schlessinger's conditions but fails effectivity, and hence is not algebraic.
The Quot functor (parametrizing quotients of a coherent sheaf on with Hilbert polynomial ) satisfies Artin's criteria:
- Deformations of : where .
- Obstructions: .
- Effectivity: Formal GAGA.
Grothendieck proved is a projective scheme (stronger than just algebraic).
For a reductive group over a field and a smooth projective curve , the moduli stack of principal -bundles on satisfies Artin's criteria:
- Deformations of : , where is the adjoint bundle.
- Obstructions: .
- Dimension: .
This is a smooth algebraic stack, locally of finite type, central to the geometric Langlands program.
Historical context
Artin's representability theorem was developed in a series of papers:
- Artin (1969): "Algebraization of formal moduli I" -- criteria for formal moduli to be algebraizable.
- Artin (1970): "Algebraization of formal moduli II" -- the full representability theorem for functors.
- Artin (1974): "Versal deformations and algebraic stacks" -- extension to stacks.
These built on Schlessinger's (1968) criteria for pro-representability of formal deformation functors. Artin's key insight was that Schlessinger's formal criteria, combined with effectivity and openness of versality, suffice to produce a global algebraic structure.
The modern perspective, particularly through derived algebraic geometry (Lurie, Toen--Vezzosi), reformulates the criteria in terms of the cotangent complex, providing a more conceptual and computationally effective approach.
Summary
Artin's representability theorem reduces the problem of constructing algebraic stacks to verifying a finite list of deformation-theoretic conditions. The key inputs are: the stack axiom, finite presentation, Schlessinger-type conditions on infinitesimal deformations, effectivity of formal deformations, and openness of versality. In practice, these reduce to computing the tangent and obstruction spaces and of the moduli problem.