Proof of the Artin Representability Theorem
We present the proof that a stack (or functor) satisfying Artin's axioms is algebraic. The proof constructs a smooth atlas by building formal versal deformations, algebraizing them, and then showing that the resulting morphism is smooth. This is the foundational argument that underlies the construction of virtually all moduli stacks in algebraic geometry.
Recollection of the statement
Let be an excellent scheme and a category fibered in groupoids over satisfying:
- is a stack for the fppf topology.
- is limit-preserving (locally of finite presentation).
- satisfies Schlessinger's conditions (S1) and (S2) for the fiber products of Artinian rings.
- Formal deformations are effective.
- Openness of versality.
- The deformation and obstruction theory is controlled by coherent sheaves.
Then is an algebraic stack, locally of finite presentation over .
Step 1: Construction of the formal versal deformation
Goal: For each closed point (i.e., an object for a field ), construct a complete Noetherian local ring with residue field and a formally versal deformation lifting .
Construction via Schlessinger's theorem: By conditions (3) and (6), the deformation functor (deformations of over Artinian local -algebras with residue field ) satisfies Schlessinger's conditions:
(S1): For any surjection and any map , the natural map is essentially surjective.
(S2): When , the above map is an equivalence.
These conditions, combined with the finite-dimensionality of the tangent space (guaranteed by condition (6) -- the tangent space is controlled by a coherent sheaf), allow us to apply Schlessinger's theorem (extended to the groupoid setting by Rim) to conclude:
There exists a complete Noetherian local ring (with ) and a formally versal element , meaning: for every Artinian local -algebra and deformation , there exists a (not necessarily unique) local homomorphism pulling back to .
Obstruction analysis: The ideal is determined by the obstruction space . More precisely, the hull is constructed inductively: starting from , one extends to by lifting along the surjection with kernel annihilated by . The obstruction to lifting lies in . The elements of are precisely the obstructions encountered in this inductive construction.
When (the unobstructed case), is a power series ring, and the versal deformation space is smooth.
Step 2: Algebraization of the formal deformation
Goal: Promote the formal versal deformation to an algebraic deformation for some ring of finite type over , with as the completion of at a point.
Using effectivity (condition 4): Write where . The formal deformation is a compatible system . By the effectivity condition, this system is induced by a single object .
Artin approximation: Artin's approximation theorem (which requires the excellence of ) states: given , there exists an -algebra of finite type, a point with , and an object such that and agree to any prescribed finite order at .
More precisely, for any , there exists of finite type and with:
By choosing sufficiently large (depending on the obstruction theory), we can ensure that retains the essential properties of , in particular the formal versality.
Result: We obtain a scheme (or an open neighborhood of in ) of finite type over , together with a morphism that is formally smooth at the point .
Step 3: Openness of versality
Goal: Show that the morphism constructed in Step 2, which is formally smooth at the point , is actually smooth in a Zariski neighborhood of .
Using openness of versality (condition 5): This condition states precisely that the locus of points in where is formally smooth is a Zariski open subset. By construction, this locus contains , so it contains an open neighborhood .
Why this is non-trivial: Formally smooth at a point means the infinitesimal lifting property holds at that point. This is an infinitesimal condition. Openness of versality promotes this to a Zariski-open condition, bridging the formal and algebraic worlds.
Verification of openness: In practice, openness of versality follows from the coherence of the deformation and obstruction sheaves (condition 6). The formal smoothness of at a point is equivalent to the surjectivity of a map between coherent sheaves at , and surjectivity of a map of coherent sheaves is an open condition.
Result: There is an open subscheme containing such that is formally smooth, hence smooth (since and are locally of finite presentation, formal smoothness equals smoothness).
Step 4: Construction of the smooth atlas
Goal: Show that by performing the construction of Steps 1--3 for all closed points, we can patch together the local smooth morphisms into a global smooth surjection .
For each closed point : Steps 1--3 produce an affine scheme of finite type over and a smooth morphism whose image contains .
Surjectivity: The images cover all closed points of . By the limit preservation condition (2), the stack is locally of finite presentation, so its points are determined by finite-type points (closed points of fibers). Hence the collection covers all of .
Taking the disjoint union: Define (over a set of closed points covering all of ). The induced morphism is smooth (each component is smooth) and surjective (the images cover ).
Finiteness: By quasi-compactness of (or by restricting to a finite cover if is quasi-compact), we can take to be a finite disjoint union.
Conclusion: The morphism is a smooth surjection from a scheme, i.e., is a smooth atlas. Combined with the representability of the diagonal (which follows from the Schlessinger-type conditions on isomorphism functors), this proves is an algebraic stack.
Detailed analysis of the key steps
Schlessinger's conditions in detail
The classical Schlessinger theorem applies to functors . For stacks, we need the groupoid version (due to Rim):
Given with surjective, the fiber product is an Artinian local ring, and the condition is: where the right side is the 2-fiber product of groupoids (not just the fiber product of sets). This means:
-
Essential surjectivity: Given , , and an isomorphism in , there exists with and (compatibly with ).
-
Full faithfulness: The isomorphism between any two lifts is also compatible.
This 2-categorical refinement is essential for the proof to work for stacks (as opposed to just functors).
The role of Artin approximation
The key algebraization tool is:
Artin approximation (strong form): Let be the completion of an excellent local ring . Let be a functor locally of finite presentation. If , then for every , there exists with .
Applied to our situation: , and the formal versal deformation is approximated by an algebraic deformation for a ring of finite type. The approximation to high enough order preserves the formal smoothness of the map .
Why excellence is needed: Artin approximation requires the base to be excellent, which ensures that the completion map is regular (=geometrically regular fibers) and that Neron desingularization applies. Over non-excellent bases, the theorem can fail.
Representability of the diagonal
The proof that is representable uses the same strategy applied to the isomorphism functor:
For objects , the sheaf must be shown to be an algebraic space. This is a functor on :
The Schlessinger-type conditions for imply analogous conditions for :
- The tangent space is (a coherent module).
- The obstruction space is .
By Artin's representability for algebraic spaces (Theorem 4.2), is an algebraic space. This gives the representability of .
For the special case : is an algebraic group space over , whose Lie algebra is .
The unobstructed case
When the obstruction space for all objects, the proof simplifies dramatically:
- Formal versal deformation: (a smooth formal scheme, since no obstructions no relations).
- Algebraization: algebraizes to over (or an etale neighborhood).
- Versality: The map is smooth at the origin, and by openness, smooth everywhere.
This gives a smooth atlas from a smooth scheme, so is a smooth algebraic stack.
Application: This applies to (), (vector bundles on a curve), and (abelian varieties), all of which have . The proof of algebraicity for these moduli stacks is essentially formal once the vanishing of is established.
Modern perspective: the cotangent complex
In derived algebraic geometry, Artin's conditions (3)--(6) are elegantly captured by a single condition on the cotangent complex :
A derived stack is algebraic if and only if:
- is a sheaf for the etale topology.
- is nilcomplete and integrable (formal conditions).
- is connective and almost of finite presentation.
Condition (3) subsumes Schlessinger's conditions, effectivity, and openness of versality. The cotangent complex at a point computes:
- (infinitesimal automorphisms),
- (deformations),
- (obstructions).
The advantage: the cotangent complex is a single coherent object encoding all of the infinitesimal information, and its existence is often easier to verify than the individual Artin axioms.
Summary of the proof structure
The proof of Artin representability follows the blueprint:
- Schlessinger/Rim: Build the formal versal deformation ring and formal object .
- Effectivity + Artin approximation: Algebraize to get over a ring of finite type.
- Openness of versality: Promote formal smoothness at a point to smoothness on an open set.
- Glue: Perform this at all points and take the disjoint union to get a smooth surjective atlas.
The diagonal representability is handled separately by applying the algebraic space version of the theorem to isomorphism functors.