ConceptComplete

Morphisms of Schemes

Morphisms of schemes are the structure-preserving maps in the category of schemes. They generalize the notion of regular functions between varieties and provide the foundation for studying geometric properties in algebraic geometry.

Basic Definitions

DefinitionMorphism of Schemes

A morphism of schemes f:XYf: X \to Y is a morphism of locally ringed spaces, consisting of:

  1. A continuous map f:XYf: |X| \to |Y| of underlying topological spaces
  2. A morphism of sheaves of rings f:OYfOXf^\sharp: \mathcal{O}_Y \to f_*\mathcal{O}_X

such that for every point xXx \in X, the induced map on stalks fx:OY,f(x)OX,xf_x^\sharp: \mathcal{O}_{Y,f(x)} \to \mathcal{O}_{X,x} is a local homomorphism of local rings (i.e., fx(mY,f(x))mX,xf_x^\sharp(\mathfrak{m}_{Y,f(x)}) \subseteq \mathfrak{m}_{X,x}).

Remark

The local ring condition is automatic when both schemes are locally of finite type over a field, but crucial in general. It ensures that the map respects the "geometric" nature of the spaces.

Morphisms of Affine Schemes

The key insight connecting scheme theory to commutative algebra is the contravariant equivalence between affine schemes and rings.

TheoremMorphisms of Affine Schemes

Let AA and BB be rings. There is a natural bijection HomSch(Spec B,Spec A)HomRing(A,B)\text{Hom}_{\text{Sch}}(\text{Spec } B, \text{Spec } A) \cong \text{Hom}_{\text{Ring}}(A, B) given by sending a morphism f:Spec BSpec Af: \text{Spec } B \to \text{Spec } A to the ring homomorphism f:ABf^\sharp: A \to B.

The correspondence is contravariant: a ring homomorphism ϕ:AB\phi: A \to B induces:

  • On points: qϕ1(q)\mathfrak{q} \mapsto \phi^{-1}(\mathfrak{q}) for prime ideals qB\mathfrak{q} \subseteq B
  • On functions: aϕ(a)a \mapsto \phi(a) for aAa \in A
Proof

Given ϕ:AB\phi: A \to B, we construct f:Spec BSpec Af: \text{Spec } B \to \text{Spec } A:

Continuous map: For qSpec B\mathfrak{q} \in \text{Spec } B, define f(q)=ϕ1(q)f(\mathfrak{q}) = \phi^{-1}(\mathfrak{q}). This is prime since ϕ1\phi^{-1} preserves ideal operations. For IAI \subseteq A, we have f1(V(I))={q:ϕ1(q)I}={q:qϕ(I)}=V(ϕ(I)B)f^{-1}(V(I)) = \{\mathfrak{q} : \phi^{-1}(\mathfrak{q}) \supseteq I\} = \{\mathfrak{q} : \mathfrak{q} \supseteq \phi(I)\} = V(\phi(I)B) which is closed, so ff is continuous.

Sheaf map: For U=D(g)Spec AU = D(g) \subseteq \text{Spec } A, we have f1(U)=D(ϕ(g))f^{-1}(U) = D(\phi(g)). Define ϕU:AgBϕ(g),agnϕ(a)ϕ(g)n\phi_U: A_g \to B_{\phi(g)}, \quad \frac{a}{g^n} \mapsto \frac{\phi(a)}{\phi(g)^n} These maps are compatible and define f:OSpec AfOSpec Bf^\sharp: \mathcal{O}_{\text{Spec } A} \to f_*\mathcal{O}_{\text{Spec } B}.

Local ring condition: At qSpec B\mathfrak{q} \in \text{Spec } B, the stalk map is Aϕ1(q)BqA_{\phi^{-1}(\mathfrak{q})} \to B_\mathfrak{q} If a/sAϕ1(q)a/s \in A_{\phi^{-1}(\mathfrak{q})} with sϕ1(q)s \notin \phi^{-1}(\mathfrak{q}), then ϕ(s)q\phi(s) \notin \mathfrak{q}, so the map sends non-units to non-units, hence is local.

Conversely, given f:Spec BSpec Af: \text{Spec } B \to \text{Spec } A, the global sections f:ABf^\sharp: A \to B define the corresponding ring homomorphism.

ExampleProjection Maps

Consider ϕ:k[x]k[x,y]\phi: k[x] \to k[x,y], the inclusion. This induces f:Ak2=Spec k[x,y]Ak1=Spec k[x]f: \mathbb{A}^2_k = \text{Spec } k[x,y] \to \mathbb{A}^1_k = \text{Spec } k[x] the projection (x,y)x(x,y) \mapsto x. On prime ideals:

  • The zero ideal (0)(0)(0) \mapsto (0) (generic point to generic point)
  • Maximal ideal (xa,yb)(xa)(x-a, y-b) \mapsto (x-a) (closed point to closed point)
  • Principal prime (f(x,y))(0)(f(x,y)) \mapsto (0) or (xa)(x-a) depending on whether ff depends on both variables

This is the prototypical example of a dominant morphism.

ExampleClosed Embedding via Quotient

Let ϕ:k[x,y]k[x,y]/(y2x3)\phi: k[x,y] \to k[x,y]/(y^2 - x^3). This induces f:V(y2x3)Ak2f: V(y^2 - x^3) \hookrightarrow \mathbb{A}^2_k The morphism is:

  • On topological spaces: inclusion of the closed subset V(y2x3)V(y^2-x^3)
  • On structure sheaves: the quotient map restricted to open sets

This is a closed immersion, the scheme-theoretic generalization of a closed subvariety.

ExampleFrobenius Endomorphism

In characteristic p>0p > 0, consider ϕ:k[x]k[x]\phi: k[x] \to k[x] given by xxpx \mapsto x^p (assuming kk is perfect). This induces the Frobenius morphism F:Ak1Ak1F: \mathbb{A}^1_k \to \mathbb{A}^1_k On points, if m=(xa)\mathfrak{m} = (x-a) for aka \in k, then F(m)=ϕ1(xa)=(xa1/p)F(\mathfrak{m}) = \phi^{-1}(x-a) = (x - a^{1/p}) So FF is bijective on kk-rational points (when kk is algebraically closed) but not an isomorphism of schemes! The induced map on structure sheaves is not an isomorphism.

General Morphisms and Gluing

For general schemes, morphisms are defined by gluing affine pieces.

TheoremMorphisms by Gluing

Let X=UiX = \bigcup U_i and Y=VjY = \bigcup V_j be open covers by affine schemes. A morphism f:XYf: X \to Y is determined by:

  1. For each ii, an index j(i)j(i) such that f(Ui)Vj(i)f(U_i) \subseteq V_{j(i)}
  2. Morphisms fi:UiVj(i)f_i: U_i \to V_{j(i)}
  3. Compatibility on overlaps: fiUiUi=fiUiUif_i|_{U_i \cap U_{i'}} = f_{i'}|_{U_i \cap U_{i'}}
ExampleMorphism from Projective Space

Consider the map Pk1Ak1\mathbb{P}^1_k \to \mathbb{A}^1_k defined by [x:y]x/y[x:y] \mapsto x/y where y0y \neq 0. On affine charts:

  • On U0=Spec k[t]U_0 = \text{Spec } k[t] (where t=y/xt = y/x): we get the map k[u]k[t]k[u] \to k[t] sending u1/tu \mapsto 1/t
  • On U1=Spec k[s]U_1 = \text{Spec } k[s] (where s=x/ys = x/y): we get the map k[u]k[s]k[u] \to k[s] sending usu \mapsto s

On the overlap U0U1=Spec k[t,t1]U_0 \cap U_1 = \text{Spec } k[t, t^{-1}], both maps agree: u1/t=su \mapsto 1/t = s.

This morphism is not defined at [1:0][1:0], showing that not all rational maps extend to morphisms of schemes.

ExampleBlowing Up the Origin

The blow-up of A2\mathbb{A}^2 at the origin is Bl0A2A2×P1\text{Bl}_0 \mathbb{A}^2 \subseteq \mathbb{A}^2 \times \mathbb{P}^1, defined by the equation x1y0=x0y1x_1 y_0 = x_0 y_1 where (x0,x1)A2(x_0, x_1) \in \mathbb{A}^2 and [y0:y1]P1[y_0:y_1] \in \mathbb{P}^1.

The blow-up map π:Bl0A2A2\pi: \text{Bl}_0 \mathbb{A}^2 \to \mathbb{A}^2 is the projection. On the chart y00y_0 \neq 0:

  • Spec k[x0,x1,t]/(x1x0t)Spec k[x0,t]\text{Spec } k[x_0, x_1, t]/(x_1 - x_0 t) \cong \text{Spec } k[x_0, t]
  • The map is k[x0,x1]k[x0,t]k[x_0, x_1] \to k[x_0, t] sending x0x0,x1x0tx_0 \mapsto x_0, x_1 \mapsto x_0 t

The exceptional divisor E=π1(0)P1E = \pi^{-1}(0) \cong \mathbb{P}^1 is the fiber over the origin.

The Functor of Points

An important perspective views schemes through their morphisms from other schemes.

DefinitionFunctor of Points

For a scheme XX, the functor of points is hX:SchopSet,THom(T,X)=:X(T)h_X: \text{Sch}^{\text{op}} \to \text{Set}, \quad T \mapsto \text{Hom}(T, X) =: X(T) A morphism f:XYf: X \to Y induces a natural transformation hXhYh_X \to h_Y by composition.

Remark

By Yoneda's lemma, XX is determined up to isomorphism by the functor hXh_X. This perspective is fundamental in modern algebraic geometry, especially for moduli problems.

ExampleFunctor of Points of Affine Space

For Akn=Spec k[x1,,xn]\mathbb{A}^n_k = \text{Spec } k[x_1, \ldots, x_n], we have Akn(T)=Hom(T,Akn)\mathbb{A}^n_k(T) = \text{Hom}(T, \mathbb{A}^n_k) When T=Spec RT = \text{Spec } R is affine, this equals Hom(k[x1,,xn],R)Rn\text{Hom}(k[x_1,\ldots,x_n], R) \cong R^n So Akn(T)\mathbb{A}^n_k(T) is the set of nn-tuples of global sections of OT\mathcal{O}_T.

For instance, Ak1(Ak1)=k[x]\mathbb{A}^1_k(\mathbb{A}^1_k) = k[x] consists of all polynomial functions A1A1\mathbb{A}^1 \to \mathbb{A}^1.

ExampleFunctor of Points of Projective Space

For Pkn\mathbb{P}^n_k, the set Pkn(T)\mathbb{P}^n_k(T) consists of line bundles L\mathcal{L} on TT together with (n+1)(n+1) global sections s0,,snΓ(T,L)s_0, \ldots, s_n \in \Gamma(T, \mathcal{L}) that generate L\mathcal{L} at every point.

When T=Spec kT = \text{Spec } k is a point, this reduces to kn+1{0}k^{n+1} \setminus \{0\} modulo scalars, recovering classical projective space.

Types of Morphisms

Morphisms are classified by various properties that generalize geometric concepts from classical varieties.

Open and Closed Immersions

DefinitionOpen Immersion

A morphism f:XYf: X \to Y is an open immersion if:

  1. ff is a homeomorphism onto an open subset UYU \subseteq Y
  2. f:OYUfOXf^\sharp: \mathcal{O}_Y|_U \to f_*\mathcal{O}_X is an isomorphism

An open immersion identifies XX with an open subscheme of YY.

DefinitionClosed Immersion

A morphism f:XYf: X \to Y is a closed immersion if:

  1. ff is a homeomorphism onto a closed subset ZYZ \subseteq Y
  2. f:OYfOXf^\sharp: \mathcal{O}_Y \to f_*\mathcal{O}_X is surjective

Equivalently, ff is a closed immersion if locally on Y=Spec AY = \text{Spec } A, we have X=Spec A/IX = \text{Spec } A/I for some ideal IAI \subseteq A.

TheoremClosed Immersions and Ideal Sheaves

A closed immersion i:ZXi: Z \hookrightarrow X corresponds to a quasi-coherent sheaf of ideals IOX\mathcal{I} \subseteq \mathcal{O}_X such that:

  1. ZZ has the reduced induced scheme structure if I\mathcal{I} is radical
  2. The structure sheaf of ZZ is OZ=OX/I\mathcal{O}_Z = \mathcal{O}_X/\mathcal{I}

On affine opens U=Spec AXU = \text{Spec } A \subseteq X, we have i1(U)=Spec A/Ii^{-1}(U) = \text{Spec } A/I where I=I(U)I = \mathcal{I}(U).

ExampleMultiple Scheme Structures

Consider the line x=0x = 0 in Ak2\mathbb{A}^2_k. There are multiple closed subschemes with the same underlying space:

  • Spec k[x,y]/(x)\text{Spec } k[x,y]/(x): the reduced line (simple line)
  • Spec k[x,y]/(x2)\text{Spec } k[x,y]/(x^2): the doubled line (fat line)
  • Spec k[x,y]/(xn)\text{Spec } k[x,y]/(x^n): the nn-fold thickened line

Each gives a different closed immersion into Ak2\mathbb{A}^2_k, corresponding to ideals (x),(x2),(xn)(x), (x^2), (x^n).

ExampleScheme-Theoretic Intersection

In Ak2\mathbb{A}^2_k, consider the curves C1:y=x2C_1: y = x^2 and C2:y=0C_2: y = 0. Their scheme-theoretic intersection is C1C2=Spec k[x,y]/(x2,y)=Spec k[x]/(x2)C_1 \cap C_2 = \text{Spec } k[x,y]/(x^2, y) = \text{Spec } k[x]/(x^2) which is a non-reduced scheme supported at the origin. This captures the tangency: the curves meet with multiplicity 2.

In contrast, the set-theoretic intersection is just the origin as a reduced point.

Finiteness Conditions

DefinitionLocally of Finite Type

A morphism f:XYf: X \to Y is locally of finite type if there exists an open affine cover Y=ViY = \bigcup V_i with Vi=Spec AiV_i = \text{Spec } A_i such that for each ii, we can cover f1(Vi)f^{-1}(V_i) by open affines Uij=Spec BijU_{ij} = \text{Spec } B_{ij} where each BijB_{ij} is a finitely generated AiA_i-algebra.

DefinitionFinite Type

A morphism f:XYf: X \to Y is of finite type if it is locally of finite type and quasi-compact.

DefinitionFinite Morphism

A morphism f:XYf: X \to Y is finite if there exists an open affine cover Y=ViY = \bigcup V_i with Vi=Spec AiV_i = \text{Spec } A_i such that f1(Vi)=Spec Bif^{-1}(V_i) = \text{Spec } B_i where each BiB_i is a finitely generated AiA_i-module.

Equivalently, ff is affine and the induced map on global sections makes OX\mathcal{O}_X into a coherent OY\mathcal{O}_Y-module.

ExampleNormalization Map

Let kk be a field and consider f:Spec k[t]Spec k[x,y]/(y2x3)f: \text{Spec } k[t] \to \text{Spec } k[x,y]/(y^2 - x^3) induced by xt2,yt3x \mapsto t^2, y \mapsto t^3. This is the normalization morphism.

Check finiteness:

  • k[t]k[t] is finitely generated as a k[x,y]/(y2x3)k[x,y]/(y^2-x^3)-algebra (generator: tt)
  • Is k[t]k[t] finitely generated as a module? The subring k[t2,t3]k[t]k[t^2, t^3] \subseteq k[t] has [k[t]:k[t2,t3]]=[k[t] : k[t^2,t^3]] = \infty as a module

So ff is of finite type but NOT finite. The normalization is finite for curves, but this requires proving integrality.

ExampleFinite Field Extension

Let kLk \subseteq L be a finite field extension. Then f:Spec LSpec kf: \text{Spec } L \to \text{Spec } k is a finite morphism. Indeed, LL is a finite-dimensional kk-vector space, hence a finitely generated kk-module.

The map is surjective on points (the unique point of Spec L\text{Spec } L maps to the unique point of Spec k\text{Spec } k) but can have degree >1> 1 in the sense of extension degree [L:k][L:k].

ExampleCyclic Cover

Consider the morphism f:Ak1Ak1f: \mathbb{A}^1_k \to \mathbb{A}^1_k induced by k[x]k[y]k[x] \to k[y] sending xynx \mapsto y^n. This is the nn-th power map, a finite flat morphism of degree nn.

Finiteness: k[y]k[y] is a free k[x]k[x]-module with basis {1,y,,yn1}\{1, y, \ldots, y^{n-1}\} via x=ynx = y^n.

The fiber over x=a0x = a \neq 0 consists of nn points (the nn-th roots of aa), while the fiber over x=0x = 0 is a single reduced point.

Affine Morphisms

DefinitionAffine Morphism

A morphism f:XYf: X \to Y is affine if for every open affine VYV \subseteq Y, the preimage f1(V)f^{-1}(V) is affine.

TheoremCharacterization of Affine Morphisms

A morphism f:XYf: X \to Y is affine if and only if for some (equivalently, every) open affine cover {Vi}\{V_i\} of YY, each f1(Vi)f^{-1}(V_i) is affine.

For affine f:XYf: X \to Y, we have X=SpecYAX = \text{Spec}_Y \mathcal{A} where A=fOX\mathcal{A} = f_*\mathcal{O}_X is a quasi-coherent OY\mathcal{O}_Y-algebra.

ExampleLine Bundle as Affine Morphism

A line bundle L\mathcal{L} on XX gives an affine morphism V(L)=SpecXSym(L)X\mathbb{V}(\mathcal{L}) = \text{Spec}_X \text{Sym}(\mathcal{L}) \to X This is the total space of the line bundle viewed as a scheme.

For L=OX\mathcal{L} = \mathcal{O}_X, we get AX1=X×A1X\mathbb{A}^1_X = X \times \mathbb{A}^1 \to X, the projection from the affine line bundle.

ExampleSpec of a Sheaf of Algebras

Let X=Pk1X = \mathbb{P}^1_k and A=OP1OP1(1)\mathcal{A} = \mathcal{O}_{\mathbb{P}^1} \oplus \mathcal{O}_{\mathbb{P}^1}(-1) with the natural algebra structure. Then SpecP1AP1\text{Spec}_{\mathbb{P}^1} \mathcal{A} \to \mathbb{P}^1 is an affine morphism whose fibers are varying: over P1{[0:1]}\mathbb{P}^1 \setminus \{[0:1]\}, the fiber is A2\mathbb{A}^2, but the total space is not a vector bundle.

Dominant Morphisms

DefinitionDominant Morphism

A morphism f:XYf: X \to Y is dominant if the image f(X)f(X) is dense in YY, or equivalently, if the generic point of YY is in the image of ff.

Remark

For irreducible schemes, dominance means the generic point of YY is in the image. For affine schemes f:Spec BSpec Af: \text{Spec } B \to \text{Spec } A induced by ϕ:AB\phi: A \to B, dominance is equivalent to ϕ\phi being injective.

ExampleProjection is Dominant

The projection Ak2Ak1\mathbb{A}^2_k \to \mathbb{A}^1_k given by (x,y)x(x,y) \mapsto x is dominant. The generic point (0)Spec k[x](0) \in \text{Spec } k[x] pulls back to (0)Spec k[x,y](0) \in \text{Spec } k[x,y].

In classical terms, the image of the projection map contains a dense open subset.

ExampleClosed Embedding is Not Dominant

A proper closed immersion is never dominant. For instance, V(x)Ak2V(x) \hookrightarrow \mathbb{A}^2_k has image the closed set V(x)V(x), which is not dense. The generic point (0)(0) of A2\mathbb{A}^2 is not in V(x)V(x).

Separated and Proper Morphisms

DefinitionSeparated Morphism

A morphism f:XYf: X \to Y is separated if the diagonal morphism Δ:XX×YX\Delta: X \to X \times_Y X is a closed immersion.

DefinitionProper Morphism

A morphism f:XYf: X \to Y is proper if it is separated, of finite type, and universally closed (closed under any base change).

ExampleProjective Morphisms are Proper

For any scheme YY, the projection PYnY\mathbb{P}^n_Y \to Y is proper. This is the fundamental example of a proper morphism.

In particular, PknSpec k\mathbb{P}^n_k \to \text{Spec } k is proper, generalizing the compactness of projective space.

ExampleAffine Line is Not Proper

The structure morphism Ak1Spec k\mathbb{A}^1_k \to \text{Spec } k is not proper (though it is separated and of finite type). The closed subset V(xt)Ak1×Spec k[ϵ]/(ϵ2)V(x-t) \subseteq \mathbb{A}^1_k \times \text{Spec } k[\epsilon]/(\epsilon^2) projects to the open point (0)Spec k[ϵ]/(ϵ2)(0) \in \text{Spec } k[\epsilon]/(\epsilon^2), which is not closed.

Geometrically, A1\mathbb{A}^1 is not compact.

Special Morphisms

Structure Morphism

DefinitionStructure Morphism

Every scheme XX over a base scheme SS (or ring RR) comes with a distinguished morphism π:XS\pi: X \to S (or XSpec RX \to \text{Spec } R) called the structure morphism.

For schemes over a field kk, this is the unique morphism XSpec kX \to \text{Spec } k.

ExampleStructure Morphism of a Variety

For a variety XX over kk, the structure morphism XSpec kX \to \text{Spec } k encodes how XX is defined over kk. The kk-rational points of XX are the sections of this morphism: X(k)=Homk(Spec k,X)X(k) = \text{Hom}_k(\text{Spec } k, X)

Frobenius Morphism

ExampleAbsolute Frobenius

In characteristic p>0p > 0, the absolute Frobenius F:XXF: X \to X is defined by:

  • Identity on topological spaces
  • On structure sheaves: aapa \mapsto a^p

For X=Spec AX = \text{Spec } A, this comes from the ring homomorphism AA,aapA \to A, a \mapsto a^p (which is a homomorphism since (a+b)p=ap+bp(a+b)^p = a^p + b^p in characteristic pp).

Properties:

  • FF is a homeomorphism but not an isomorphism of schemes
  • FF is purely inseparable of degree pdimXp^{\dim X}
  • The differential dF=0dF = 0 (Frobenius kills all differentials)
ExampleRelative Frobenius

For a scheme XX over Fp\mathbb{F}_p, the relative Frobenius is the unique morphism FX/Fp:XX(p)F_{X/\mathbb{F}_p}: X \to X^{(p)} factoring the absolute Frobenius Fabs:XXF_{\mathrm{abs}} : X \to X through the base change X(p)XX^{(p)} \to X, where X(p)=X×SpecFp,FSpecFpX^{(p)} = X \times_{\operatorname{Spec} \mathbb{F}_p, F} \operatorname{Spec} \mathbb{F}_p is the Frobenius twist.

The relative Frobenius is a morphism over Fp\mathbb{F}_p (unlike the absolute Frobenius, which is not). For an elliptic curve E/FpE / \mathbb{F}_p, the degree of FE/FpF_{E/\mathbb{F}_p} is pp, and #E(Fp)=deg(1F)\#E(\mathbb{F}_p) = \deg(1 - F).

Finite Integral Extensions

TheoremFinite Morphisms and Integrality

Let f:XYf: X \to Y be a finite morphism of schemes. Then:

  1. ff is closed
  2. ff is surjective if and only if the induced map on global sections is injective (for irreducible schemes)
  3. The fibers of ff are finite sets (as topological spaces)
  4. ff satisfies the going-up and going-down theorems from commutative algebra
ExampleNormalization of a Curve

Let X=V(y2x2(x+1))Ak2X = V(y^2 - x^2(x+1)) \subseteq \mathbb{A}^2_k be the node curve. The normalization is ν:X~=Ak1X\nu: \tilde{X} = \mathbb{A}^1_k \to X given by t(t21,t(t21))t \mapsto (t^2-1, t(t^2-1)).

On the ring level: k[x,y]/(y2x2(x+1))k[t]k[x,y]/(y^2 - x^2(x+1)) \subseteq k[t] where the left side is the coordinate ring of XX. The map is finite since k[t]k[t] is integral over the coordinate ring (both xx and yy satisfy monic polynomial relations).

The normalization is bijective on underlying sets except at the node, where the two branches separate.

Summary Table of Morphism Types

| Type | Topological Condition | Ring-Theoretic Condition | Example | |------|----------------------|--------------------------|---------| | Open immersion | Homeomorphism to open subset | ff^\sharp is isomorphism on image | Spec k[x,x1]Spec k[x]\text{Spec } k[x,x^{-1}] \to \text{Spec } k[x] | | Closed immersion | Homeomorphism to closed subset | ff^\sharp is surjective | V(I)Spec AV(I) \hookrightarrow \text{Spec } A | | Finite type | Quasi-compact | Finitely generated algebra | Varieties over kk | | Finite | Closed with finite fibers | Finitely generated module | Finite field extension | | Affine | Affine preimages | Corresponds to sheaf of algebras | Vector bundle total space | | Dominant | Dense image | Injective on functions | Projection A2A1\mathbb{A}^2 \to \mathbb{A}^1 | | Separated | Diagonal is closed | "Hausdorff-like" | Affine and projective schemes | | Proper | Universally closed | Projective-like | PnSpec k\mathbb{P}^n \to \text{Spec } k | | Flat | Continuous in families | Flat modules | Smooth families | | Smooth | Submersive | Regular sequence | AnSpec k\mathbb{A}^n \to \text{Spec } k |

Composition and Base Change

TheoremProperties Stable Under Composition

The following properties of morphisms are stable under composition:

  • Open/closed immersions
  • Finite type, finite, affine
  • Separated, proper
  • Flat, smooth, étale

If f:XYf: X \to Y and g:YZg: Y \to Z have property P\mathcal{P} (from the list above), then gf:XZg \circ f: X \to Z also has property P\mathcal{P}.

TheoremBase Change

Given a morphism f:XYf: X \to Y and a base change g:YYg: Y' \to Y, form the fiber product X=X×YYX' = X \times_Y Y' with projections f:XYf': X' \to Y' and g:XXg': X' \to X.

Many properties are preserved by base change:

  • Open/closed immersions
  • Finite type, finite, affine
  • Separated (proper is universally closed by definition)
  • Flat (crucial for families)
ExampleBase Change of Affine Space

Consider AknSpec k\mathbb{A}^n_k \to \text{Spec } k and base change by Spec LSpec k\text{Spec } L \to \text{Spec } k for a field extension L/kL/k. The fiber product is Akn×Spec kSpec L=ALn\mathbb{A}^n_k \times_{\text{Spec } k} \text{Spec } L = \mathbb{A}^n_L which is affine nn-space over LL. This is the process of extending scalars.

ExampleFiber Over a Point

For f:XYf: X \to Y and a point yYy \in Y corresponding to Spec k(y)Y\text{Spec } k(y) \to Y, the fiber is Xy=X×YSpec k(y)X_y = X \times_Y \text{Spec } k(y) This is the scheme-theoretic fiber, generalizing the classical fiber of a map.

For Ak2Ak1\mathbb{A}^2_k \to \mathbb{A}^1_k projecting (x,y)x(x,y) \mapsto x, the fiber over aka \in k is Ak2×Ak1Spec k=V(xa)Ak1\mathbb{A}^2_k \times_{\mathbb{A}^1_k} \text{Spec } k = V(x-a) \cong \mathbb{A}^1_k the vertical line through x=ax = a.

Isomorphisms and Automorphisms

DefinitionIsomorphism of Schemes

A morphism f:XYf: X \to Y is an isomorphism if there exists a morphism g:YXg: Y \to X such that gf=idXg \circ f = \text{id}_X and fg=idYf \circ g = \text{id}_Y.

Equivalently, ff is a homeomorphism and f:OYfOXf^\sharp: \mathcal{O}_Y \to f_*\mathcal{O}_X is an isomorphism of sheaves.

ExampleAutomorphisms of Affine Space

The automorphism group Aut(Ak1)\text{Aut}(\mathbb{A}^1_k) consists of affine transformations xax+bx \mapsto ax + b with aka \in k^* and bkb \in k.

For Ak2\mathbb{A}^2_k, the automorphism group is much larger and includes the group of tame automorphisms (generated by affine and triangular maps) and the wild automorphisms (e.g., the Nagata automorphism).

ExampleAutomorphisms of Projective Space

The automorphism group Aut(Pkn)PGLn+1(k)\text{Aut}(\mathbb{P}^n_k) \cong \text{PGL}_{n+1}(k) consists of projectivized linear transformations: [x0::xn][a00x0++a0nxn::an0x0++annxn][x_0 : \cdots : x_n] \mapsto [a_{00}x_0 + \cdots + a_{0n}x_n : \cdots : a_{n0}x_0 + \cdots + a_{nn}x_n] where (aij)GLn+1(k)(a_{ij}) \in \text{GL}_{n+1}(k), considered up to scalar multiplication.

Rational Maps

Remark

While morphisms are everywhere defined, in classical algebraic geometry we also consider rational maps, which are only defined on an open dense subset.

DefinitionRational Map

A rational map f:XYf: X \dashrightarrow Y is an equivalence class of pairs (U,fU)(U, f_U) where UXU \subseteq X is open dense and fU:UYf_U: U \to Y is a morphism. Two pairs (U,fU)(U, f_U) and (V,fV)(V, f_V) are equivalent if fU=fVf_U = f_V on UVU \cap V.

A rational map is dominant if the image of fUf_U is dense in YY for some (equivalently, every) representative.

ExampleProjection from a Point

Consider the projection from the point p=[0:0:1]Pk2p = [0:0:1] \in \mathbb{P}^2_k to a line Pk1\ell \cong \mathbb{P}^1_k. This gives a rational map π:Pk2Pk1\pi: \mathbb{P}^2_k \dashrightarrow \mathbb{P}^1_k defined everywhere except at pp. On the affine chart z0z \neq 0, this is given by (x,y)x/y(x,y) \mapsto x/y or similar.

This is a classical example of a birational map that is not a morphism.

Applications and Further Topics

Morphisms of schemes provide the language for:

  1. Moduli problems: Classifying geometric objects by representing them as morphisms to a moduli space
  2. Families of varieties: A morphism XTX \to T can be viewed as a family of varieties parametrized by TT
  3. Intersection theory: Proper intersections are defined using fiber products
  4. Cohomology: Many cohomological constructions (pushforward, pullback) depend on morphisms
  5. Étale topology: Étale morphisms form the covering systems for the étale site

The theory of morphisms extends naturally to:

  • Morphisms of stacks (for moduli problems with automorphisms)
  • Morphisms in derived algebraic geometry (accounting for higher homotopical information)
  • Rigid analytic geometry (analytic morphisms over non-archimedean fields)

References

  • Hartshorne, Algebraic Geometry, Chapter II, Section 2-4
  • Vakil, The Rising Sea, Chapters 7-10
  • EGA II, Grothendieck-Dieudonné
  • Liu, Algebraic Geometry and Arithmetic Curves, Chapter 3