ConceptComplete

Homological Mirror Symmetry - Key Properties

The categorical equivalence in homological mirror symmetry has profound structural consequences, connecting invariants and structures on both sides. Understanding these properties reveals the deep mathematics underlying mirror symmetry.

Derived Equivalences and K-Theory

The HMS equivalence induces isomorphisms on K-theory and Hochschild (co)homology.

DefinitionK-Theory Isomorphism

The derived equivalence Db(Coh(X))≃DFuk(X∨)D^b(Coh(X)) \simeq D\mathcal{F}uk(X^\vee) induces an isomorphism: K0(X)β‰…HH0(Fuk(X∨))K_0(X) \cong HH_0(\mathcal{F}uk(X^\vee))

where K0(X)K_0(X) is the Grothendieck group and HH0HH_0 is the zeroth Hochschild homology.

For Calabi-Yau threefolds, this explains the swap of Hodge numbers: h1,1(X)h^{1,1}(X) (dimension of K0K_0 modulo numerical equivalence) equals h2,1(X∨)h^{2,1}(X^\vee) and vice versa.

Remark

The Hochschild cohomology HHβˆ—(Db(Coh(X)))HH^*(D^b(Coh(X))) is isomorphic to Hβˆ—(Ξ›βˆ—TX)H^*(\Lambda^* TX) by the Hochschild-Kostant-Rosenberg theorem. Under HMS, this should match the quantum cohomology of X∨X^\vee, explaining the A-model/B-model correspondence.

Serre Functors and Canonical Bundles

Both categories possess Serre functors reflecting the geometric canonical bundle.

DefinitionSerre Functor

A Serre functor S:Cβ†’CS: \mathcal{C} \to \mathcal{C} on a triangulated category satisfies: Hom(A,B)βˆ—β‰…Hom(B,S(A))\text{Hom}(A, B)^* \cong \text{Hom}(B, S(A))

functorially in AA and BB.

For Db(Coh(X))D^b(Coh(X)), the Serre functor is S=βˆ’βŠ—KX[n]S = - \otimes K_X [n] where KXK_X is the canonical bundle and [n][n] is shift by dimension. For Calabi-Yau manifolds with KXβ‰…OXK_X \cong \mathcal{O}_X, the Serre functor is S=[n]S = [n], the shift functor.

On the Fukaya side, the Serre functor corresponds to the antipodal map or symplectic rotation, reflecting the duality in Floer theory.

Stability Conditions and BridgelandSpaces

The space of stability conditions on a derived category carries important geometric information.

DefinitionBridgeland Stability

A stability condition on a triangulated category C\mathcal{C} consists of:

  1. A heart AβŠ‚C\mathcal{A} \subset \mathcal{C} (abelian subcategory)
  2. A central charge Z:K0(C)β†’CZ: K_0(\mathcal{C}) \to \mathbb{C}

satisfying compatibility: arg⁑(Z(E))>arg⁑(Z(F))\arg(Z(E)) > \arg(Z(F)) for subobjects FβŠ‚EF \subset E in A\mathcal{A}.

The space Stab(C)\text{Stab}(\mathcal{C}) of stability conditions is conjectured to be a complex manifold. For Calabi-Yau manifolds, this space connects to:

  • Stringy KΓ€hler moduli: The space of stability conditions mirrors the complexified KΓ€hler cone
  • Mirror symmetry: Stability conditions on Db(Coh(X))D^b(Coh(X)) parametrize special Lagrangians in X∨X^\vee

Categorical Entropy and Dynamics

The auto-equivalences of derived categories encode geometric transformations.

Remark

The auto-equivalence group Aut(Db(Coh(X)))\text{Aut}(D^b(Coh(X))) contains:

  1. Tensor product with line bundles: βˆ’βŠ—L- \otimes \mathcal{L}
  2. Shift functors: [k][k] for k∈Zk \in \mathbb{Z}
  3. Spherical twists: Associated to spherical objects

These generate a large group connecting to birational geometry and mirror symmetry dualities.

Hodge Structures from Categories

The categorical data recovers Hodge-theoretic information.

DefinitionCategorical Hodge Structure

The categorical Hodge structure is defined using: Hcatk(X)=⨁iβˆ’j=kExti(E,EβŠ—KXj)H^k_{\text{cat}}(X) = \bigoplus_{i-j=k} \text{Ext}^i(E, E \otimes K_X^j)

for suitable objects EE. This recovers the geometric Hodge structure under appropriate conditions.

For Calabi-Yau manifolds, the periodic cyclic homology of the derived category carries a mixed Hodge structure isomorphic to the geometric one via the Hochschild-Kostant-Rosenberg isomorphism.

ExampleHMS for Tori

For complex tori TT and dual torus T^\hat{T}: Db(Coh(T))≃DFuk(T^)D^b(Coh(T)) \simeq D\mathcal{F}uk(\hat{T})

The equivalence exchanges:

  • Line bundles ↔\leftrightarrow Lagrangian tori (fibers of moment map)
  • Skyscraper sheaves ↔\leftrightarrow Special Lagrangian sections

This classical example illustrates all key features of HMS in a computable setting.

These properties demonstrate how HMS unifies symplectic and complex geometry through category theory, providing structural explanations for mirror symmetry phenomena.