ConceptComplete

Homological Mirror Symmetry - Core Definitions

Homological mirror symmetry (HMS) is Kontsevich's profound categorical reformulation of mirror symmetry, positing an equivalence between derived categories of coherent sheaves and Fukaya categories. This framework provides a mathematically rigorous foundation for mirror symmetry.

DefinitionHomological Mirror Symmetry Conjecture

For a mirror pair (X,X)(X, X^\vee) of Calabi-Yau manifolds, there exists an equivalence of triangulated categories: Db(Coh(X))DFuk(X)D^b(Coh(X)) \simeq D\mathcal{F}uk(X^\vee)

where Db(Coh(X))D^b(Coh(X)) is the bounded derived category of coherent sheaves on XX, and DFuk(X)D\mathcal{F}uk(X^\vee) is the derived Fukaya category of XX^\vee.

This conjecture unifies various aspects of mirror symmetry: the A-model corresponds to the Fukaya side (symplectic geometry), while the B-model corresponds to the coherent sheaf side (complex geometry). The categorical equivalence implies all previously observed mirror phenomena.

DefinitionDerived Category of Coherent Sheaves

The derived category Db(Coh(X))D^b(Coh(X)) is constructed from:

  1. The abelian category Coh(X)Coh(X) of coherent sheaves on XX
  2. Complexes of coherent sheaves: F=(FiFi+1)\mathcal{F}^\bullet = (\cdots \to \mathcal{F}^i \to \mathcal{F}^{i+1} \to \cdots)
  3. Quasi-isomorphisms inverted to form the derived category

Objects are complexes, morphisms are chain maps up to homotopy, and triangles come from mapping cones.

The bounded derived category contains complexes with finitely many non-zero cohomology sheaves. Key examples include:

  • Structure sheaf: OX\mathcal{O}_X (skyscraper at a point)
  • Ideal sheaves: IZ\mathcal{I}_Z for subvarieties ZXZ \subset X
  • Complexes from resolutions: 0OXOX(D)00 \to \mathcal{O}_X \to \mathcal{O}_X(D) \to 0
DefinitionFukaya Category

The Fukaya category Fuk(X)\mathcal{F}uk(X) of a symplectic manifold XX has:

  • Objects: Lagrangian submanifolds LXL \subset X equipped with flat U(1)U(1) connections
  • Morphisms: Hom(L0,L1)=HF(L0,L1)\text{Hom}(L_0, L_1) = HF^*(L_0, L_1), the Floer cohomology
  • Composition: Defined by counting pseudo-holomorphic triangles

The Floer cohomology HF(L0,L1)HF^*(L_0, L_1) is computed as the homology of the complex generated by intersection points L0L1L_0 \cap L_1, with differential counting pseudo-holomorphic strips.

The AA_\infty structure on the Fukaya category arises from higher compositions involving pseudo-holomorphic polygons. This structure is essential for making the category well-defined.

Remark

The Fukaya category depends on choices: almost complex structure JJ, symplectic form ω\omega, and perturbation data. However, the derived category DFuk(X)D\mathcal{F}uk(X) is expected to be independent of these choices, providing an intrinsic invariant of the symplectic manifold.

ExampleElliptic Curves

For an elliptic curve EE viewed as a complex torus C/Λ\mathbb{C}/\Lambda:

  • B-side: Db(Coh(E))D^b(Coh(E)) is generated by OE\mathcal{O}_E and skyscraper sheaves
  • A-side: DFuk(E)D\mathcal{F}uk(E) is generated by Lagrangian circles

The HMS equivalence matches line bundles to Lagrangian tori and point sheaves to Lagrangian circles.

Homological mirror symmetry elevates mirror symmetry from numerical coincidences to categorical equivalences, providing a framework that explains and generalizes classical mirror symmetry phenomena.