TheoremComplete

The Riemann Mapping Theorem β€” Formal Statement and Proof Outline

The Riemann mapping theorem establishes a conformal equivalence between any proper simply connected domain and the unit disk, providing the most fundamental uniformization result in one complex variable.


Formal Statement

Theorem7.5Riemann mapping theorem (precise)

Let D⊊CD \subsetneq \mathbb{C} be a simply connected domain. Then there exists a biholomorphic map Ο†:Dβ†’D\varphi: D \to \mathbb{D}. For any fixed z0∈Dz_0 \in D, the map is unique subject to Ο†(z0)=0\varphi(z_0) = 0 and Ο†β€²(z0)>0\varphi'(z_0) > 0.


Proof

Proof

Existence of an injective map into D\mathbb{D}.

Since Dβ‰ CD \neq \mathbb{C}, there exists aβˆ‰Da \notin D. Since DD is simply connected, zβˆ’az - a has a holomorphic square root on DD: there exists h:Dβ†’Ch: D \to \mathbb{C} holomorphic with h(z)2=zβˆ’ah(z)^2 = z - a. Since hh is injective (if h(z1)=h(z2)h(z_1) = h(z_2) then z1βˆ’a=z2βˆ’az_1 - a = z_2 - a), and h(D)∩(βˆ’h(D))=βˆ…h(D) \cap (-h(D)) = \emptyset (otherwise h(z1)=βˆ’h(z2)h(z_1) = -h(z_2) implies z1=z2z_1 = z_2 and h(z1)=0h(z_1) = 0, contradicting aβˆ‰Da \notin D).

The set h(D)h(D) is open, so pick w0∈h(D)w_0 \in h(D) and Ξ΅>0\varepsilon > 0 with D(w0,Ξ΅)βŠ‚h(D)D(w_0, \varepsilon) \subset h(D). Then D(βˆ’w0,Ξ΅)∩h(D)=βˆ…D(-w_0, \varepsilon) \cap h(D) = \emptyset (since h(D)∩(βˆ’h(D))=βˆ…h(D) \cap (-h(D)) = \emptyset). The map g(z)=1h(z)+w0g(z) = \frac{1}{h(z) + w_0} is bounded on DD (since ∣h(z)+w0∣β‰₯Ξ΅/2|h(z) + w_0| \geq \varepsilon/2 away from βˆ’w0-w_0), and after rescaling, we get an injective holomorphic ψ:Dβ†’D\psi: D \to \mathbb{D}.

Maximization argument.

Define F={f:Dβ†’D∣fΒ holomorphic,Β injective,Β f(z0)=0}\mathcal{F} = \{f: D \to \mathbb{D} \mid f \text{ holomorphic, injective, } f(z_0) = 0\}. We showed Fβ‰ βˆ…\mathcal{F} \neq \emptyset. Let Ξ»=sup⁑f∈F∣fβ€²(z0)∣\lambda = \sup_{f \in \mathcal{F}} |f'(z_0)|. By the Schwarz lemma applied to the inverse, Ξ»<∞\lambda < \infty.

Choose fn∈Ff_n \in \mathcal{F} with ∣fnβ€²(z0)βˆ£β†’Ξ»|f_n'(z_0)| \to \lambda. By Montel's theorem (the family is bounded by 11), extract a subsequence fnkβ†’Ο†f_{n_k} \to \varphi uniformly on compacts.

By Hurwitz's theorem, Ο†\varphi is either injective or constant. Since βˆ£Ο†β€²(z0)∣=Ξ»>0|\varphi'(z_0)| = \lambda > 0, Ο†\varphi is injective.

Surjectivity.

Suppose w0∈Dβˆ–Ο†(D)w_0 \in \mathbb{D} \setminus \varphi(D). Consider ψ=Ο†w0βˆ˜Ο†\psi = \varphi_{w_0} \circ \varphi where Ο†w0(w)=(wβˆ’w0)/(1βˆ’wΛ‰0w)\varphi_{w_0}(w) = (w-w_0)/(1-\bar{w}_0 w). Then ψ:Dβ†’Dβˆ–{0}\psi: D \to \mathbb{D} \setminus \{0\} is injective with ψ(z0)=βˆ’w0/(1βˆ’βˆ£w0∣2)β‹…βˆ£w0∣2/(βˆ’w0)β‰ 0\psi(z_0) = -w_0/(1-|w_0|^2) \cdot |w_0|^2/(-w_0) \neq 0.

Taking a square root Οƒ(z)=ψ(z)\sigma(z) = \sqrt{\psi(z)} (possible since DD is simply connected and Οˆβ‰ 0\psi \neq 0), then normalizing to get Οƒ~∈F\tilde{\sigma} \in \mathcal{F} with βˆ£Οƒ~β€²(z0)∣>βˆ£Ο†β€²(z0)∣=Ξ»|\tilde{\sigma}'(z_0)| > |\varphi'(z_0)| = \lambda. This contradicts the maximality of Ξ»\lambda.

Therefore φ\varphi is surjective, and φ:D→D\varphi: D \to \mathbb{D} is biholomorphic. Normalizing by a rotation ensures φ′(z0)>0\varphi'(z_0) > 0, and uniqueness follows from the Schwarz lemma. ■\blacksquare

β– 

Applications

ExampleSolving Dirichlet problems

The Riemann mapping theorem reduces the Dirichlet problem on any simply connected domain to the Dirichlet problem on the disk (which is solved by the Poisson integral formula). If uu is harmonic on DD with boundary values gg, and Ο†:Dβ†’D\varphi: D \to \mathbb{D} is the Riemann map, then u=(gβˆ˜Ο†βˆ’1)∘Pu = (g \circ \varphi^{-1}) \circ P where PP is the Poisson kernel.

RemarkCaratheodory's extension theorem

If βˆ‚D\partial D is a Jordan curve, then Ο†\varphi extends to a homeomorphism Dβ€Ύβ†’Dβ€Ύ\overline{D} \to \overline{\mathbb{D}}. This boundary correspondence is crucial for applications and connects the Riemann mapping theorem to potential theory.