ProofComplete

Proof of the Schwarz Lemma

The Schwarz lemma is a fundamental rigidity result constraining holomorphic self-maps of the unit disk that fix the origin. Despite its simple statement, it has far-reaching consequences.


Statement

Theorem7.8Schwarz lemma (restated)

Let f:D→Df: \mathbb{D} \to \mathbb{D} be holomorphic with f(0)=0f(0) = 0. Then:

  1. ∣f(z)∣≤∣z∣|f(z)| \leq |z| for all z∈Dz \in \mathbb{D}.
  2. ∣f′(0)∣≤1|f'(0)| \leq 1.
  3. If equality holds in (1) for some z≠0z \neq 0 or in (2), then ff is a rotation: f(z)=eiθzf(z) = e^{i\theta}z.

Proof

Proof

Construction of the auxiliary function.

Define g:D→Cg: \mathbb{D} \to \mathbb{C} by

g(z)={f(z)/zif z≠0,f′(0)if z=0.g(z) = \begin{cases} f(z)/z & \text{if } z \neq 0, \\ f'(0) & \text{if } z = 0. \end{cases}

Since f(0)=0f(0) = 0, the function f(z)/zf(z)/z has a removable singularity at z=0z = 0 (its Taylor series is a1+a2z+a3z2+⋯a_1 + a_2 z + a_3 z^2 + \cdots where f(z)=a1z+a2z2+⋯f(z) = a_1 z + a_2 z^2 + \cdots). Setting g(0)=a1=f′(0)g(0) = a_1 = f'(0) makes gg holomorphic on all of D\mathbb{D}.

Applying the maximum modulus principle.

For 0<r<10 < r < 1, on the circle ∣z∣=r|z| = r:

∣g(z)∣=∣f(z)∣∣z∣≤1r|g(z)| = \frac{|f(z)|}{|z|} \leq \frac{1}{r}

since ∣f(z)∣≤1|f(z)| \leq 1 (ff maps into D\mathbb{D}). By the maximum modulus principle, ∣g(z)∣≤1/r|g(z)| \leq 1/r for all ∣z∣≤r|z| \leq r.

Taking the limit r→1−r \to 1^-.

Since ∣g(z)∣≤1/r|g(z)| \leq 1/r for every r∈(∣z∣,1)r \in (|z|, 1), letting r→1−r \to 1^- gives ∣g(z)∣≤1|g(z)| \leq 1 for all z∈Dz \in \mathbb{D}.

This means ∣f(z)/z∣≤1|f(z)/z| \leq 1, i.e., ∣f(z)∣≤∣z∣|f(z)| \leq |z| for all z∈Dz \in \mathbb{D}. Also ∣g(0)∣=∣f′(0)∣≤1|g(0)| = |f'(0)| \leq 1.

Rigidity (equality case).

If ∣g(z0)∣=1|g(z_0)| = 1 for some z0∈Dz_0 \in \mathbb{D} (including z0=0z_0 = 0), then ∣g∣|g| attains its maximum in D\mathbb{D}. By the maximum modulus principle, gg is constant: g(z)=eiθg(z) = e^{i\theta} for some θ∈R\theta \in \mathbb{R}. Therefore f(z)=eiθzf(z) = e^{i\theta}z is a rotation. ■\blacksquare

■

Corollaries

RemarkSchwarz-Pick lemma derivation

The Schwarz-Pick lemma follows by "conjugation." Given f:D→Df: \mathbb{D} \to \mathbb{D} holomorphic and a∈Da \in \mathbb{D}, let φa(z)=(z−a)/(1−aˉz)\varphi_a(z) = (z-a)/(1-\bar{a}z) be the Mobius automorphism swapping 00 and aa. Apply the Schwarz lemma to

g=φf(a)∘f∘φa−1:D→D,g(0)=0.g = \varphi_{f(a)} \circ f \circ \varphi_a^{-1}: \mathbb{D} \to \mathbb{D}, \quad g(0) = 0.

Then ∣g(z)∣≤∣z∣|g(z)| \leq |z| translates to ∣φf(a)(f(φa−1(z)))∣≤∣z∣|\varphi_{f(a)}(f(\varphi_a^{-1}(z)))| \leq |z|, which gives the Schwarz-Pick inequality.

ExampleApplication: bounded derivative

If f:D→Df: \mathbb{D} \to \mathbb{D} is holomorphic, then for all z∈Dz \in \mathbb{D}:

∣f′(z)∣≤1−∣f(z)∣21−∣z∣2.|f'(z)| \leq \frac{1 - |f(z)|^2}{1 - |z|^2}.

In particular, ∣f′(0)∣≤1−∣f(0)∣2≤1|f'(0)| \leq 1 - |f(0)|^2 \leq 1, with equality iff ff is a Mobius automorphism.

This estimate is sharp: the Mobius transformation φa(z)=(z−a)/(1−aˉz)\varphi_a(z) = (z-a)/(1-\bar{a}z) satisfies ∣φa′(z)∣=(1−∣a∣2)/∣1−aˉz∣2=(1−∣φa(z)∣2)/(1−∣z∣2)|\varphi_a'(z)| = (1-|a|^2)/|1-\bar{a}z|^2 = (1-|\varphi_a(z)|^2)/(1-|z|^2).

RemarkGeometric interpretation

The Schwarz-Pick lemma states that holomorphic self-maps of D\mathbb{D} are contractions in the Poincare metric. The isometries are precisely the Mobius automorphisms Aut(D)\text{Aut}(\mathbb{D}). This connects complex analysis to hyperbolic geometry in a profound way.