ProofComplete

Proof of the Schwarz Lemma

The Schwarz lemma is a fundamental rigidity result constraining holomorphic self-maps of the unit disk that fix the origin. Despite its simple statement, it has far-reaching consequences.


Statement

Theorem7.8Schwarz lemma (restated)

Let f:DDf: \mathbb{D} \to \mathbb{D} be holomorphic with f(0)=0f(0) = 0. Then:

  1. f(z)z|f(z)| \leq |z| for all zDz \in \mathbb{D}.
  2. f(0)1|f'(0)| \leq 1.
  3. If equality holds in (1) for some z0z \neq 0 or in (2), then ff is a rotation: f(z)=eiθzf(z) = e^{i\theta}z.

Proof

Proof

Construction of the auxiliary function.

Define g:DCg: \mathbb{D} \to \mathbb{C} by

g(z)={f(z)/zif z0,f(0)if z=0.g(z) = \begin{cases} f(z)/z & \text{if } z \neq 0, \\ f'(0) & \text{if } z = 0. \end{cases}

Since f(0)=0f(0) = 0, the function f(z)/zf(z)/z has a removable singularity at z=0z = 0 (its Taylor series is a1+a2z+a3z2+a_1 + a_2 z + a_3 z^2 + \cdots where f(z)=a1z+a2z2+f(z) = a_1 z + a_2 z^2 + \cdots). Setting g(0)=a1=f(0)g(0) = a_1 = f'(0) makes gg holomorphic on all of D\mathbb{D}.

Applying the maximum modulus principle.

For 0<r<10 < r < 1, on the circle z=r|z| = r:

g(z)=f(z)z1r|g(z)| = \frac{|f(z)|}{|z|} \leq \frac{1}{r}

since f(z)1|f(z)| \leq 1 (ff maps into D\mathbb{D}). By the maximum modulus principle, g(z)1/r|g(z)| \leq 1/r for all zr|z| \leq r.

Taking the limit r1r \to 1^-.

Since g(z)1/r|g(z)| \leq 1/r for every r(z,1)r \in (|z|, 1), letting r1r \to 1^- gives g(z)1|g(z)| \leq 1 for all zDz \in \mathbb{D}.

This means f(z)/z1|f(z)/z| \leq 1, i.e., f(z)z|f(z)| \leq |z| for all zDz \in \mathbb{D}. Also g(0)=f(0)1|g(0)| = |f'(0)| \leq 1.

Rigidity (equality case).

If g(z0)=1|g(z_0)| = 1 for some z0Dz_0 \in \mathbb{D} (including z0=0z_0 = 0), then g|g| attains its maximum in D\mathbb{D}. By the maximum modulus principle, gg is constant: g(z)=eiθg(z) = e^{i\theta} for some θR\theta \in \mathbb{R}. Therefore f(z)=eiθzf(z) = e^{i\theta}z is a rotation. \blacksquare


Corollaries

RemarkSchwarz-Pick lemma derivation

The Schwarz-Pick lemma follows by "conjugation." Given f:DDf: \mathbb{D} \to \mathbb{D} holomorphic and aDa \in \mathbb{D}, let φa(z)=(za)/(1aˉz)\varphi_a(z) = (z-a)/(1-\bar{a}z) be the Mobius automorphism swapping 00 and aa. Apply the Schwarz lemma to

g=φf(a)fφa1:DD,g(0)=0.g = \varphi_{f(a)} \circ f \circ \varphi_a^{-1}: \mathbb{D} \to \mathbb{D}, \quad g(0) = 0.

Then g(z)z|g(z)| \leq |z| translates to φf(a)(f(φa1(z)))z|\varphi_{f(a)}(f(\varphi_a^{-1}(z)))| \leq |z|, which gives the Schwarz-Pick inequality.

ExampleApplication: bounded derivative

If f:DDf: \mathbb{D} \to \mathbb{D} is holomorphic, then for all zDz \in \mathbb{D}:

f(z)1f(z)21z2.|f'(z)| \leq \frac{1 - |f(z)|^2}{1 - |z|^2}.

In particular, f(0)1f(0)21|f'(0)| \leq 1 - |f(0)|^2 \leq 1, with equality iff ff is a Mobius automorphism.

This estimate is sharp: the Mobius transformation φa(z)=(za)/(1aˉz)\varphi_a(z) = (z-a)/(1-\bar{a}z) satisfies φa(z)=(1a2)/1aˉz2=(1φa(z)2)/(1z2)|\varphi_a'(z)| = (1-|a|^2)/|1-\bar{a}z|^2 = (1-|\varphi_a(z)|^2)/(1-|z|^2).

RemarkGeometric interpretation

The Schwarz-Pick lemma states that holomorphic self-maps of D\mathbb{D} are contractions in the Poincare metric. The isometries are precisely the Mobius automorphisms Aut(D)\text{Aut}(\mathbb{D}). This connects complex analysis to hyperbolic geometry in a profound way.