Riemann Mapping Theorem
The Riemann mapping theorem is one of the deepest results in complex analysis: every simply connected domain (other than itself) is conformally equivalent to the unit disk.
Statement
Let be a simply connected domain with at least two boundary points. Then there exists a biholomorphic (conformal and bijective) map . Moreover, for any , there is a unique such map with and .
The Riemann mapping theorem asserts that the conformal geometry of simply connected planar domains is trivial: they are all the same (conformally speaking). The theorem is non-constructive β it guarantees existence but does not provide an explicit formula. Finding explicit conformal maps is the subject of Schwarz-Christoffel theory and other constructive methods.
Proof Strategy (Outline)
A family of holomorphic functions on a domain is normal if every sequence in has a subsequence converging uniformly on compact subsets of .
A uniformly bounded family of holomorphic functions on a domain is normal. That is, if with for all and , then there exists a subsequence converging uniformly on compact subsets.
- Define the family and show .
- Maximize : Let . By Montel's theorem, there exists with and a convergent subsequence .
- Show : By Hurwitz's theorem, the limit is injective (since all are injective and is non-constant).
- Show is surjective: If , construct with , a contradiction.
- Uniqueness: If are two solutions with , , then is an automorphism of fixing with positive derivative, hence the identity.
Consequences
While the general theorem is non-constructive, explicit maps are known for many domains:
- Half-plane : (Cayley map).
- Vertical strip : maps to .
- Sector : followed by the Cayley map.
- Disk minus a slit: involves elliptic functions.
The Riemann map extends continuously to the boundary when is a Jordan curve (Caratheodory's theorem). More precisely, extends to a homeomorphism . For smooth boundaries, the boundary extension inherits regularity.
The Riemann mapping theorem fails in higher dimensions. In (), the unit ball and the unit polydisk are not biholomorphically equivalent (Poincare, 1907). Conformal geometry in higher dimensions is far richer.