ConceptComplete

Direct Sums and Tensor Products

Representations can be combined using fundamental constructions from linear algebra, extended naturally to preserve the group action structure.

DefinitionDirect Sum of Representations

Let (ρ1,V1)(\rho_1, V_1) and (ρ2,V2)(\rho_2, V_2) be representations of GG. Their direct sum is the representation (ρ,V1βŠ•V2)(\rho, V_1 \oplus V_2) where: ρ(g)(v1,v2)=(ρ1(g)(v1),ρ2(g)(v2))\rho(g)(v_1, v_2) = (\rho_1(g)(v_1), \rho_2(g)(v_2)) for all g∈Gg \in G, v1∈V1v_1 \in V_1, v2∈V2v_2 \in V_2.

This generalizes to finite direct sums V1βŠ•β‹―βŠ•VnV_1 \oplus \cdots \oplus V_n.

ExampleDecomposing Representations

Consider G=Z/2ZG = \mathbb{Z}/2\mathbb{Z} acting on R2\mathbb{R}^2 by reflection through the origin. This decomposes as R2=Re1βŠ•Re2\mathbb{R}^2 = \mathbb{R} e_1 \oplus \mathbb{R} e_2 where the generator acts as βˆ’1-1 on each one-dimensional subspace.

For the regular representation C[G]\mathbb{C}[G] of a finite group, it decomposes as: C[G]≅⨁VΒ irreducibleVβŠ•dim⁑V\mathbb{C}[G] \cong \bigoplus_{V \text{ irreducible}} V^{\oplus \dim V} where each irreducible representation appears with multiplicity equal to its dimension.

DefinitionTensor Product of Representations

Let (ρ1,V1)(\rho_1, V_1) and (ρ2,V2)(\rho_2, V_2) be representations of GG. Their tensor product is the representation (ρ,V1βŠ—V2)(\rho, V_1 \otimes V_2) defined on elementary tensors by: ρ(g)(v1βŠ—v2)=ρ1(g)(v1)βŠ—Ο2(g)(v2)\rho(g)(v_1 \otimes v_2) = \rho_1(g)(v_1) \otimes \rho_2(g)(v_2) and extended linearly.

The dimension satisfies dim⁑(V1βŠ—V2)=dim⁑(V1)β‹…dim⁑(V2)\dim(V_1 \otimes V_2) = \dim(V_1) \cdot \dim(V_2).

The tensor product operation makes Rep(G)\text{Rep}(G) into a monoidal category, with the trivial representation as the unit object.

DefinitionDual Representation

Let (ρ,V)(\rho, V) be a representation. The dual representation (Οβˆ—,Vβˆ—)(\rho^*, V^*) is defined on the dual space Vβˆ—=HomF(V,F)V^* = \text{Hom}_{\mathbb{F}}(V, \mathbb{F}) by: (Οβˆ—(g)(Ο†))(v)=Ο†(ρ(gβˆ’1)(v))(\rho^*(g)(\varphi))(v) = \varphi(\rho(g^{-1})(v)) for all g∈Gg \in G, Ο†βˆˆVβˆ—\varphi \in V^*, v∈Vv \in V.

Remark

The contragredient action (using gβˆ’1g^{-1}) is necessary to ensure Οβˆ—\rho^* is a homomorphism: Οβˆ—(g1g2)=Οβˆ—(g1)βˆ˜Οβˆ—(g2)\rho^*(g_1 g_2) = \rho^*(g_1) \circ \rho^*(g_2). For finite groups, the dual of an irreducible representation is also irreducible, and for unitary representations over C\mathbb{C}, the dual is isomorphic to the complex conjugate representation.

These constructions allow us to build complex representations from simpler ones and study the algebraic structure of Rep(G)\text{Rep}(G). Understanding how irreducible representations decompose under tensor product is a central problem, solved completely for compact Lie groups via the Clebsch-Gordan theory.