ConceptComplete

Convergence of Sequences

The concept of convergence is central to analysis. A sequence converges if its terms approach a single limiting value as the index tends to infinity. The epsilon-delta definition, formalized by Cauchy and Weierstrass in the 19th century, provides a rigorous foundation for calculus and analysis.


Definition and basic properties

Definition2.1Convergence of a sequence

A sequence (an)(a_n) in R\mathbb{R} converges to a limit L∈RL \in \mathbb{R} if for every ϡ>0\epsilon > 0, there exists N∈NN \in \mathbb{N} such that

∣anβˆ’L∣<Ο΅forΒ allΒ nβ‰₯N.|a_n - L| < \epsilon \quad \text{for all } n \geq N.

We write lim⁑nβ†’βˆžan=L\lim_{n \to \infty} a_n = L or anβ†’La_n \to L as nβ†’βˆžn \to \infty.

RemarkEpsilon-N definition

The definition says: eventually, all terms of the sequence lie within any prescribed distance Ο΅\epsilon of the limit LL. No matter how small Ο΅>0\epsilon > 0 is chosen, only finitely many terms lie outside the interval (Lβˆ’Ο΅,L+Ο΅)(L - \epsilon, L + \epsilon).

ExampleConvergence of 1/n

Let an=1/na_n = 1/n. Then anβ†’0a_n \to 0 as nβ†’βˆžn \to \infty.

Proof: Given Ο΅>0\epsilon > 0, by the Archimedean property, choose N∈NN \in \mathbb{N} such that 1/N<Ο΅1/N < \epsilon. Then for all nβ‰₯Nn \geq N,

∣anβˆ’0∣=1n≀1N<Ο΅.|a_n - 0| = \frac{1}{n} \leq \frac{1}{N} < \epsilon.

Thus an→0a_n \to 0.

ExampleConstant sequences

If an=ca_n = c for all nn (constant), then anβ†’ca_n \to c. Indeed, for any Ο΅>0\epsilon > 0, ∣anβˆ’c∣=0<Ο΅|a_n - c| = 0 < \epsilon for all nβ‰₯1n \geq 1.

ExampleAlternating sequence

Let an=(βˆ’1)n/na_n = (-1)^n/n. Then anβ†’0a_n \to 0. For ∣anβˆ’0∣=1/nβ†’0|a_n - 0| = 1/n \to 0 as nβ†’βˆžn \to \infty, regardless of the sign.

ExampleDivergent sequence

Let an=na_n = n. Then (an)(a_n) does not converge. For any proposed limit LL, taking Ο΅=1\epsilon = 1, we have ∣anβˆ’L∣=∣nβˆ’Lβˆ£β†’βˆž|a_n - L| = |n - L| \to \infty, so no NN works. We write anβ†’+∞a_n \to +\infty (diverges to infinity).


Uniqueness of limits

Theorem2.1Uniqueness of limits

If an→La_n \to L and an→L′a_n \to L', then L=L′L = L'.

Proof

Suppose Lβ‰ Lβ€²L \neq L'. Let Ο΅=∣Lβˆ’Lβ€²βˆ£/2>0\epsilon = |L - L'|/2 > 0. Since anβ†’La_n \to L, there exists N1N_1 such that ∣anβˆ’L∣<Ο΅|a_n - L| < \epsilon for all nβ‰₯N1n \geq N_1. Similarly, there exists N2N_2 such that ∣anβˆ’Lβ€²βˆ£<Ο΅|a_n - L'| < \epsilon for all nβ‰₯N2n \geq N_2. Let N=max⁑(N1,N2)N = \max(N_1, N_2). Then for nβ‰₯Nn \geq N,

∣Lβˆ’Lβ€²βˆ£=∣(Lβˆ’an)+(anβˆ’Lβ€²)βˆ£β‰€βˆ£Lβˆ’an∣+∣anβˆ’Lβ€²βˆ£<Ο΅+Ο΅=∣Lβˆ’Lβ€²βˆ£,|L - L'| = |(L - a_n) + (a_n - L')| \leq |L - a_n| + |a_n - L'| < \epsilon + \epsilon = |L - L'|,

a contradiction. Thus L=Lβ€²L = L'.

β– 

Algebra of limits

Theorem2.2Algebra of limits

If an→aa_n \to a and bn→bb_n \to b, then:

  1. an+bn→a+ba_n + b_n \to a + b.
  2. anβˆ’bnβ†’aβˆ’ba_n - b_n \to a - b.
  3. anbn→aba_n b_n \to ab.
  4. If b≠0b \neq 0, then an/bn→a/ba_n / b_n \to a/b (assuming bn≠0b_n \neq 0 for all nn).
RemarkProof sketch

These are proved using the epsilon-N definition and the triangle inequality. For example, for (1): given Ο΅>0\epsilon > 0, choose N1N_1 such that ∣anβˆ’a∣<Ο΅/2|a_n - a| < \epsilon/2 for nβ‰₯N1n \geq N_1, and N2N_2 such that ∣bnβˆ’b∣<Ο΅/2|b_n - b| < \epsilon/2 for nβ‰₯N2n \geq N_2. For nβ‰₯max⁑(N1,N2)n \geq \max(N_1, N_2),

∣(an+bn)βˆ’(a+b)βˆ£β‰€βˆ£anβˆ’a∣+∣bnβˆ’b∣<Ο΅/2+Ο΅/2=Ο΅.|(a_n + b_n) - (a + b)| \leq |a_n - a| + |b_n - b| < \epsilon/2 + \epsilon/2 = \epsilon.

ExampleSum of convergent sequences

Let an=1/na_n = 1/n and bn=1/n2b_n = 1/n^2. Then an→0a_n \to 0, bn→0b_n \to 0, and an+bn=1/n+1/n2→0+0=0a_n + b_n = 1/n + 1/n^2 \to 0 + 0 = 0.

ExampleProduct of sequences

Let an=1+1/nβ†’1a_n = 1 + 1/n \to 1 and bn=2βˆ’1/nβ†’2b_n = 2 - 1/n \to 2. Then anbn=(1+1/n)(2βˆ’1/n)=2+1/nβˆ’1/n2β†’1β‹…2=2a_n b_n = (1 + 1/n)(2 - 1/n) = 2 + 1/n - 1/n^2 \to 1 \cdot 2 = 2.


Squeeze theorem

Theorem2.3Squeeze Theorem

Suppose an≀bn≀cna_n \leq b_n \leq c_n for all nβ‰₯N0n \geq N_0, and anβ†’La_n \to L, cnβ†’Lc_n \to L. Then bnβ†’Lb_n \to L.

Proof

Given Ο΅>0\epsilon > 0, choose N1β‰₯N0N_1 \geq N_0 such that ∣anβˆ’L∣<Ο΅|a_n - L| < \epsilon for nβ‰₯N1n \geq N_1, i.e., Lβˆ’Ο΅<an<L+Ο΅L - \epsilon < a_n < L + \epsilon. Similarly, choose N2N_2 such that Lβˆ’Ο΅<cn<L+Ο΅L - \epsilon < c_n < L + \epsilon for nβ‰₯N2n \geq N_2. For nβ‰₯max⁑(N1,N2)n \geq \max(N_1, N_2),

Lβˆ’Ο΅<an≀bn≀cn<L+Ο΅,L - \epsilon < a_n \leq b_n \leq c_n < L + \epsilon,

so ∣bnβˆ’L∣<Ο΅|b_n - L| < \epsilon. Thus bnβ†’Lb_n \to L.

β– 
ExampleSqueeze theorem application

Let bn=sin⁑(n)/nb_n = \sin(n)/n. Since βˆ’1≀sin⁑(n)≀1-1 \leq \sin(n) \leq 1, we have

βˆ’1n≀sin⁑(n)n≀1n.-\frac{1}{n} \leq \frac{\sin(n)}{n} \leq \frac{1}{n}.

Since 1/nβ†’01/n \to 0 and βˆ’1/nβ†’0-1/n \to 0, by the squeeze theorem, sin⁑(n)/nβ†’0\sin(n)/n \to 0.


Bounded sequences

Definition2.2Bounded sequence

A sequence (an)(a_n) is bounded if there exists M>0M > 0 such that ∣anβˆ£β‰€M|a_n| \leq M for all n∈Nn \in \mathbb{N}.

Theorem2.4Convergent sequences are bounded

If an→La_n \to L, then (an)(a_n) is bounded.

Proof

Choose Ο΅=1\epsilon = 1. There exists NN such that ∣anβˆ’L∣<1|a_n - L| < 1 for all nβ‰₯Nn \geq N, i.e., Lβˆ’1<an<L+1L - 1 < a_n < L + 1 for nβ‰₯Nn \geq N. Let

M=max⁑(∣a1∣,∣a2∣,…,∣aNβˆ’1∣,∣L∣+1).M = \max(|a_1|, |a_2|, \ldots, |a_{N-1}|, |L| + 1).

Then ∣anβˆ£β‰€M|a_n| \leq M for all n∈Nn \in \mathbb{N}.

β– 
RemarkConverse is false

A bounded sequence need not converge. For example, an=(βˆ’1)na_n = (-1)^n is bounded (∣an∣=1|a_n| = 1) but does not converge (it oscillates between βˆ’1-1 and 11).

ExampleBounded divergent sequence

Let an=sin⁑(n)a_n = \sin(n). Then ∣anβˆ£β‰€1|a_n| \leq 1 for all nn, so (an)(a_n) is bounded. However, (an)(a_n) does not converge: the sequence sin⁑(1),sin⁑(2),sin⁑(3),…\sin(1), \sin(2), \sin(3), \ldots is dense in [βˆ’1,1][-1, 1] and has no limit.


Subsequences and Bolzano-Weierstrass

Definition2.3Subsequence

A subsequence of (an)(a_n) is a sequence (ank)(a_{n_k}) where n1<n2<n3<β‹―n_1 < n_2 < n_3 < \cdots is a strictly increasing sequence of indices.

Theorem2.5Bolzano-Weierstrass Theorem

Every bounded sequence in R\mathbb{R} has a convergent subsequence.

RemarkProof deferred

The proof uses the completeness of R\mathbb{R} and the nested intervals property. See Bolzano-Weierstrass Theorem for details.

ExampleExtracting a convergent subsequence

Let an=(βˆ’1)na_n = (-1)^n. The sequence does not converge, but the subsequence a2k=1a_{2k} = 1 converges to 11, and a2k+1=βˆ’1a_{2k+1} = -1 converges to βˆ’1-1. Both are convergent subsequences.


Summary

Convergence is the foundation of real analysis:

  • A sequence converges if its terms eventually lie within any Ο΅\epsilon of the limit.
  • Limits are unique, and arithmetic operations preserve limits.
  • The squeeze theorem is a powerful tool for computing limits.
  • Convergent sequences are bounded, but not conversely.
  • Bolzano-Weierstrass ensures every bounded sequence has a convergent subsequence.

See Cauchy Sequences for an alternative characterization of convergence, and Monotone Convergence Theorem for a major application of completeness.