ConceptComplete

Adjugate Matrix and Matrix Inverse Formula

The adjugate matrix, constructed from cofactors, provides an explicit formula for the inverse of a matrix. This connection reveals the deep relationship between determinants and invertibility.

DefinitionAdjugate Matrix

The adjugate (or classical adjoint) of an nΓ—nn \times n matrix AA, denoted adj(A)\text{adj}(A), is the transpose of the cofactor matrix: adj(A)=[Cij]T\text{adj}(A) = [C_{ij}]^T

That is, the (i,j)(i,j)-entry of adj(A)\text{adj}(A) is the cofactor CjiC_{ji} (note the index swap).

Explicitly: [adj(A)]ij=Cji=(βˆ’1)i+jdet⁑(Aji)[\text{adj}(A)]_{ij} = C_{ji} = (-1)^{i+j}\det(A_{ji})

TheoremInverse Formula

For any nΓ—nn \times n matrix AA: Aβ‹…adj(A)=adj(A)β‹…A=det⁑(A)β‹…IA \cdot \text{adj}(A) = \text{adj}(A) \cdot A = \det(A) \cdot I

Consequently, if det⁑(A)β‰ 0\det(A) \neq 0, then AA is invertible with: Aβˆ’1=1det⁑(A)adj(A)A^{-1} = \frac{1}{\det(A)} \text{adj}(A)

This formula is primarily of theoretical importance; for numerical computation, Gaussian elimination is far more efficient than computing n2n^2 cofactors.

ExampleComputing Inverse via Adjugate

Find the inverse of A=[1234]A = \begin{bmatrix} 1 & 2 \\ 3 & 4 \end{bmatrix}.

First, det⁑(A)=4βˆ’6=βˆ’2β‰ 0\det(A) = 4 - 6 = -2 \neq 0, so AA is invertible.

Compute cofactors:

  • C11=4C_{11} = 4, C12=βˆ’3C_{12} = -3
  • C21=βˆ’2C_{21} = -2, C22=1C_{22} = 1

Thus: adj(A)=[4βˆ’2βˆ’31]T=[4βˆ’3βˆ’21]\text{adj}(A) = \begin{bmatrix} 4 & -2 \\ -3 & 1 \end{bmatrix}^T = \begin{bmatrix} 4 & -3 \\ -2 & 1 \end{bmatrix}

Therefore: Aβˆ’1=1βˆ’2[4βˆ’3βˆ’21]=[βˆ’21.51βˆ’0.5]A^{-1} = \frac{1}{-2}\begin{bmatrix} 4 & -3 \\ -2 & 1 \end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix} -2 & 1.5 \\ 1 & -0.5 \end{bmatrix}

DefinitionCramer's Rule

Consider the system Ax=bA\mathbf{x} = \mathbf{b} where AA is nΓ—nn \times n with det⁑(A)β‰ 0\det(A) \neq 0. Let Ai(b)A_i(\mathbf{b}) be the matrix obtained by replacing column ii of AA with b\mathbf{b}.

Then the unique solution is: xi=det⁑(Ai(b))det⁑(A)forΒ i=1,2,…,nx_i = \frac{\det(A_i(\mathbf{b}))}{\det(A)} \quad \text{for } i = 1, 2, \ldots, n

ExampleCramer's Rule Application

Solve: {x+2y=53x+4y=11\begin{cases} x + 2y = 5 \\ 3x + 4y = 11 \end{cases}

We have A=[1234]A = \begin{bmatrix} 1 & 2 \\ 3 & 4 \end{bmatrix} and b=(511)\mathbf{b} = \begin{pmatrix} 5 \\ 11 \end{pmatrix}, with det⁑(A)=βˆ’2\det(A) = -2.

x=det⁑[52114]βˆ’2=20βˆ’22βˆ’2=βˆ’2βˆ’2=1x = \frac{\det\begin{bmatrix} 5 & 2 \\ 11 & 4 \end{bmatrix}}{-2} = \frac{20 - 22}{-2} = \frac{-2}{-2} = 1

y=det⁑[15311]βˆ’2=11βˆ’15βˆ’2=βˆ’4βˆ’2=2y = \frac{\det\begin{bmatrix} 1 & 5 \\ 3 & 11 \end{bmatrix}}{-2} = \frac{11 - 15}{-2} = \frac{-4}{-2} = 2

Remark

While Cramer's rule provides elegant theoretical insightβ€”expressing solutions directly via determinantsβ€”it's computationally inefficient for large systems, requiring (n+1)(n+1) determinant calculations. Gaussian elimination remains the practical algorithm for solving linear systems.