Triangulated Shadow
The homotopy category of a stable -category is canonically a triangulated category. This fundamental result shows that classical triangulated categories (Verdier, 1963) arise as "shadows" of the richer stable -categorical structure. The stable -category determines the triangulated structure, but not conversely: stable -categories contain strictly more information than their homotopy categories.
Statement
Let be a stable -category. Then its homotopy category is canonically a triangulated category, where:
- The shift functor is induced by the suspension .
- The distinguished triangles are the images of fiber/cofiber sequences in : a triangle in is distinguished if and only if it arises from a cofiber sequence in .
Moreover, an exact functor between stable -categories induces an exact (triangulated) functor .
The functor from stable -categories to triangulated categories is not an equivalence:
- There exist triangulated categories that do not arise as the homotopy category of any stable -category.
- There exist non-equivalent stable -categories with equivalent homotopy categories.
- There exist non-isomorphic exact functors that induce the same triangulated functor .
The passage retains only of the mapping spaces.
Construction of the Shift Functor
We verify the axioms of a triangulated category (TR1)--(TR4) for .
Step 1 (Shift functor). The suspension (defined by , the pushout of ) is an equivalence with inverse . It induces an automorphism of .
Step 2 (TR1: Extension to triangles). Given in , lift to a morphism in and take the cofiber . Then is a distinguished triangle.
Step 3 (TR2: Rotation). Given a cofiber sequence in , the square , is a pushout. In a stable -category, pushout equals pullback, so rotating gives as another cofiber sequence.
Step 4 (TR3: Morphism of triangles). Given a commutative square between the first two terms of two distinguished triangles, the fill at the cone level exists at the -level because the cofiber is functorial in .
Step 5 (TR4: Octahedral axiom). Given , the octahedral axiom follows from iterated pushouts: a grid where all rows and columns are cofiber sequences. This is automatic in the -categorical setting.
Key Examples
For a ring , the stable -category has homotopy category , the classical derived category. The triangulated structure is:
- Shift: (shift chain complex indices).
- Distinguished triangles: arise from short exact sequences of chain complexes, giving .
The stable -category resolves the well-known pathologies: non-functorial cones, non-existence of homotopy limits, failure of descent.
The homotopy category of the -category of spectra is the classical stable homotopy category. The triangulated structure has:
- Shift: (suspension).
- Distinguished triangles: cofiber sequences of spectra.
The stable homotopy category was among the earliest triangulated categories studied, predating Verdier's axiomatization. The -categorical enhancement provides the correct framework for the smash product monoidal structure.
In a triangulated category , the cone of exists but is not functorial: given a morphism of triangles, the fill at the cone level exists but is not unique. In the cofiber is a functor , fully functorial.
For example, in , the exact triangle has cone . A morphism of this triangle to itself by admits any element of as the fill, demonstrating non-uniqueness.
The homotopy limit of a tower does not generally exist in a triangulated category. The Milnor exact sequence
requires to exist, which triangulated axioms alone do not guarantee. In a stable -category with appropriate completeness, homotopy limits are well-defined by universal properties.
In a stable -category, given composable morphisms , taking iterated cofibers produces a diagram where all rows and columns are cofiber sequences. The octahedral axiom is simply the assertion that this diagram exists.
The proof is completely formal: no choices are involved, unlike the triangulated setting where the octahedral axiom must be verified separately and often with significant effort.
For a Zariski covering of a scheme , descent requires:
This limit makes sense in the -category of stable -categories but not at the triangulated level. Triangulated categories form only a -category, without good limit properties.
Algebraic K-theory of a stable -category is defined via the -construction (Waldhausen). K-theory is not a triangulated invariant: there exist triangulated equivalences with .
Schlichting showed that certain triangulated categories of the form and can be equivalent as triangulated categories while having different -groups.
Muro, Schwede, and Strickland (2007) constructed triangulated categories admitting no stable -categorical enhancement at all. Specifically, certain "exotic" triangulated structures on categories of -modules violate necessary conditions for liftability.
Conversely, Canonaco and Stellari proved uniqueness of DG enhancements for the bounded derived category of a smooth projective variety , showing that in algebro-geometric situations, the stable enhancement is often unique.
Summary
The triangulated shadow theorem reveals the precise relationship:
-
The homotopy category of a stable -category is canonically triangulated, with shift and exact triangles cofiber sequences.
-
The triangulated structure encodes cofiber sequences but loses coherence (higher homotopy of mapping spaces).
-
The passage is not faithful: different stable -categories can have equivalent homotopy categories.
-
Key failures at the triangulated level: non-functorial cones, no homotopy limits, no descent, K-theory not invariant.
-
Stable -categories are the correct framework; triangulated categories are their shadows.