TheoremComplete

Morera's Theorem

Morera's theorem provides a powerful converse to the Cauchy-Goursat theorem: if the integral of a continuous function over every closed curve vanishes, then the function must be holomorphic.


Statement

Theorem3.11Morera's theorem

Let ff be continuous on a domain DCD \subseteq \mathbb{C}. If

Tf(z)dz=0\oint_T f(z)\,dz = 0

for every triangle TT in DD (or equivalently, for every closed contour in DD), then ff is holomorphic on DD.

RemarkStrength of the conclusion

The assumption is merely continuity plus vanishing integrals, yet the conclusion gives holomorphicity — and hence infinite differentiability and analyticity. This reflects the rigidity of holomorphic functions: the integral condition alone forces a continuous function to be complex-analytic.


Proof

Proof

Fix z0Dz_0 \in D and let r>0r > 0 be such that D(z0,r)DD(z_0, r) \subset D.

Step 1. Define F(z)=z0zf(w)dwF(z) = \int_{z_0}^z f(w)\,dw where the integral is taken along the line segment from z0z_0 to zz (valid for zD(z0,r)z \in D(z_0, r)). The hypothesis that Tfdz=0\oint_T f\,dz = 0 for every triangle ensures this definition is path-independent.

Step 2. We show F(z)=f(z)F'(z) = f(z). For small h|h|:

F(z+h)F(z)hf(z)=1hzz+h[f(w)f(z)]dw.\frac{F(z+h) - F(z)}{h} - f(z) = \frac{1}{h}\int_z^{z+h} [f(w) - f(z)]\,dw.

By continuity of ff, for any ε>0\varepsilon > 0 there exists δ>0\delta > 0 such that f(w)f(z)<ε|f(w) - f(z)| < \varepsilon when wz<δ|w - z| < \delta. For h<δ|h| < \delta:

F(z+h)F(z)hf(z)1hεh=ε.\left|\frac{F(z+h) - F(z)}{h} - f(z)\right| \leq \frac{1}{|h|} \cdot \varepsilon \cdot |h| = \varepsilon.

Therefore F(z)=f(z)F'(z) = f(z).

Step 3. Since FF is holomorphic (it has a complex derivative ff), and f=Ff = F' is the derivative of a holomorphic function, ff is also holomorphic on D(z0,r)D(z_0, r). Since z0z_0 was arbitrary, ff is holomorphic on DD. \blacksquare


Applications

ExampleUniform limits of holomorphic functions

Morera's theorem implies that a uniform limit of holomorphic functions is holomorphic. If fnff_n \to f uniformly on compact subsets of DD and each fnf_n is holomorphic, then for any triangle TT in DD:

Tfdz=limnTfndz=0.\oint_T f\,dz = \lim_{n \to \infty} \oint_T f_n\,dz = 0.

Since ff is continuous (uniform limit of continuous functions), Morera's theorem gives that ff is holomorphic.

ExampleIntegrals depending on a parameter

Consider F(z)=01g(t)tzdtF(z) = \int_0^1 \frac{g(t)}{t - z}\,dt for z[0,1]z \notin [0,1], where gg is continuous. Then FF is continuous, and for any closed triangle TT not meeting [0,1][0,1]:

TF(z)dz=01g(t)(Tdztz)dt=0\oint_T F(z)\,dz = \int_0^1 g(t) \left(\oint_T \frac{dz}{t-z}\right) dt = 0

by Fubini's theorem and the fact that 1/(tz)1/(t-z) is holomorphic in zz for z[0,1]z \notin [0,1]. By Morera's theorem, FF is holomorphic on C[0,1]\mathbb{C} \setminus [0,1].


Variants and Strengthenings

RemarkWeakened hypotheses

Several strengthenings of Morera's theorem exist:

  1. It suffices to check Tfdz=0\oint_T f\,dz = 0 for triangles with sides parallel to the coordinate axes.
  2. Painleve's theorem: If ff is continuous on DD, holomorphic on DγD \setminus \gamma for a smooth curve γ\gamma, then ff is holomorphic on all of DD.
  3. If ff is continuous on DD and holomorphic on DED \setminus E where EE has zero area, then ff is holomorphic on DD.

These removability results are fundamental in the theory of analytic continuation.

RemarkComparison with real analysis

In real analysis, there is no analogue of Morera's theorem. A continuous real function whose integral over every interval is zero must be zero, but this does not force differentiability. The complex-analytic setting is far more rigid.