TheoremComplete

Integral Extensions - Main Theorem

The lying over and going up theorems describe how prime ideals behave under integral extensions, fundamental for understanding morphisms of schemes.

TheoremLying Over Theorem

Let RβŠ†SR \subseteq S be an integral extension and p∈Spec(R)\mathfrak{p} \in \text{Spec}(R). Then there exists P∈Spec(S)\mathfrak{P} \in \text{Spec}(S) such that P∩R=p\mathfrak{P} \cap R = \mathfrak{p}.

Moreover, for any prime qβŠ†p\mathfrak{q} \subseteq \mathfrak{p} and Q∈Spec(S)\mathfrak{Q} \in \text{Spec}(S) with Q∩R=q\mathfrak{Q} \cap R = \mathfrak{q}, there exists P\mathfrak{P} over p\mathfrak{p} with QβŠ†P\mathfrak{Q} \subseteq \mathfrak{P}.

This ensures that the morphism Spec(S)β†’Spec(R)\text{Spec}(S) \to \text{Spec}(R) is surjective, a key property of integral extensions geometrically corresponding to finite morphisms being surjective.

TheoremGoing Up Theorem

Let RβŠ†SR \subseteq S be an integral extension. Suppose p1βŠ†p2\mathfrak{p}_1 \subseteq \mathfrak{p}_2 are primes in RR and P1∈Spec(S)\mathfrak{P}_1 \in \text{Spec}(S) lies over p1\mathfrak{p}_1. Then there exists P2∈Spec(S)\mathfrak{P}_2 \in \text{Spec}(S) lying over p2\mathfrak{p}_2 with P1βŠ†P2\mathfrak{P}_1 \subseteq \mathfrak{P}_2.

This implies chains of primes in RR lift to chains in SS, preserving inclusion relations.

ExampleApplication to Dimension

The going up theorem implies dim⁑(S)β‰₯dim⁑(R)\dim(S) \geq \dim(R) for integral extensions. In fact, if SS is finitely generated over RR, then dim⁑(S)=dim⁑(R)\dim(S) = \dim(R).

For ZβŠ†Z[i]\mathbb{Z} \subseteq \mathbb{Z}[i]: both have dimension 1, reflecting that integral extensions preserve dimension in nice cases.

TheoremIncomparability Theorem

Let RβŠ†SR \subseteq S be an integral extension. If P1,P2∈Spec(S)\mathfrak{P}_1, \mathfrak{P}_2 \in \text{Spec}(S) both lie over the same prime p∈Spec(R)\mathfrak{p} \in \text{Spec}(R), then P1\mathfrak{P}_1 and P2\mathfrak{P}_2 are incomparable (neither contains the other).

Distinct primes over the same prime are unrelated, preventing "collapsing" of the prime spectrum structure.

Remark

For field extensions kβŠ†Kk \subseteq K, lying over is trivial (only (0)(0) exists), but for rings of integers ZβŠ†OK\mathbb{Z} \subseteq \mathcal{O}_K, lying over describes how primes factor in extensionsβ€”the foundation of algebraic number theory.

TheoremGoing Down (for Normal Domains)

If RβŠ†SR \subseteq S are integral domains with RR integrally closed and SS integral over RR, then going down holds: given p1βŠ‡p2\mathfrak{p}_1 \supseteq \mathfrak{p}_2 in RR and P1\mathfrak{P}_1 over p1\mathfrak{p}_1, there exists P2\mathfrak{P}_2 over p2\mathfrak{p}_2 with P2βŠ†P1\mathfrak{P}_2 \subseteq \mathfrak{P}_1.

Going down requires additional hypotheses (like integrally closed) and has geometric significance for flat morphisms.

ExampleFailure of Going Down

Consider k[x2,x3]βŠ†k[x]k[x^2, x^3] \subseteq k[x]. Let p1=(0)\mathfrak{p}_1 = (0) and p2=(x2)\mathfrak{p}_2 = (x^2) in k[x2,x3]k[x^2, x^3]. Taking P1=(0)\mathfrak{P}_1 = (0) in k[x]k[x] over p1\mathfrak{p}_1, there is no prime strictly below (0)(0) in k[x]k[x], so going down fails.

The failure occurs because k[x2,x3]k[x^2, x^3] is not integrally closed.

TheoremFiber Structure

For RβŠ†SR \subseteq S integral and p∈Spec(R)\mathfrak{p} \in \text{Spec}(R), the fiber over p\mathfrak{p} is: Spec(SβŠ—RΞΊ(p))\text{Spec}(S \otimes_R \kappa(\mathfrak{p}))

where ΞΊ(p)=Rp/pRp\kappa(\mathfrak{p}) = R_\mathfrak{p}/\mathfrak{p}R_\mathfrak{p} is the residue field. For integral extensions, fibers are finite (discrete spaces in Zariski topology).

Remark

The discriminant and different ideals measure ramification in integral extensions of Dedekind domains. A prime p\mathfrak{p} ramifies in SS if some prime over p\mathfrak{p} appears with multiplicity >1> 1 in the factorization of pS\mathfrak{p}S.

ExampleRamification in Number Fields

For ZβŠ†Z[i]\mathbb{Z} \subseteq \mathbb{Z}[i]:

  • (2)=(1+i)2(2) = (1+i)^2 ramifies (multiplicity 2)
  • Primes p≑1(mod4)p \equiv 1 \pmod{4} split: (p)=ppβ€Ύ(p) = \mathfrak{p}\overline{\mathfrak{p}} with distinct primes
  • Primes p≑3(mod4)p \equiv 3 \pmod{4} remain prime: (p)(p) is prime in Z[i]\mathbb{Z}[i]

Lying over, going up, and ramification theory describe this arithmetic completely.

These theorems provide the foundation for understanding how geometric and arithmetic properties transfer along integral extensions.