ConceptComplete

Integral Extensions - Key Properties

Integral extensions satisfy remarkable closure and transitivity properties that make them well-behaved for geometric and arithmetic applications.

TheoremCharacterizations of Integrality

For s∈Ss \in S where RβŠ†SR \subseteq S, the following are equivalent:

  1. ss is integral over RR
  2. R[s]R[s] is finitely generated as an RR-module
  3. ss belongs to some subring TT with RβŠ†TβŠ†SR \subseteq T \subseteq S and TT finitely generated as an RR-module
  4. There exists a faithful R[s]R[s]-module MM that is finitely generated as an RR-module

These characterizations provide different perspectivesβ€”polynomial, module-theoretic, and functorial.

ExampleUsing Module Characterization

To show 2+3\sqrt{2} + \sqrt{3} is integral over Q\mathbb{Q}, observe that Q[2,3]\mathbb{Q}[\sqrt{2}, \sqrt{3}] is a 4-dimensional Q\mathbb{Q}-vector space with basis {1,2,3,6}\{1, \sqrt{2}, \sqrt{3}, \sqrt{6}\}.

Since 2+3∈Q[2,3]\sqrt{2} + \sqrt{3} \in \mathbb{Q}[\sqrt{2}, \sqrt{3}] and this is finitely generated as a Q\mathbb{Q}-module, 2+3\sqrt{2} + \sqrt{3} is integral (algebraic) over Q\mathbb{Q}.

TheoremClosure Properties

The integral closure Rβ€Ύ\overline{R} of RR in SS is a subring of SS. Specifically:

  1. If s,t∈Ss, t \in S are integral over RR, then s+ts + t and stst are integral over RR
  2. The set of integral elements forms a ring
  3. Integrality is transitive: if SS is integral over RR and TT is integral over SS, then TT is integral over RR
ProofSketch of Transitivity

If t∈Tt \in T is integral over SS, then S[t]S[t] is finitely generated as an SS-module, say by {m1,…,mk}\{m_1, \ldots, m_k\}. If SS is integral over RR generated by {s1,…,sn}\{s_1, \ldots, s_n\} as an RR-module, then S[t]S[t] is generated as an RR-module by products {simj}\{s_i m_j\}, which are finite in number. Thus R[t]R[t] is finitely generated over RR, so tt is integral over RR.

β– 
ExampleTower of Extensions

Consider ZβŠ†Z[i]βŠ†Z[i,2]\mathbb{Z} \subseteq \mathbb{Z}[i] \subseteq \mathbb{Z}[i, \sqrt{2}]:

  • Z[i]\mathbb{Z}[i] is integral over Z\mathbb{Z} (since i2+1=0i^2 + 1 = 0)
  • Z[i,2]\mathbb{Z}[i, \sqrt{2}] is integral over Z[i]\mathbb{Z}[i] (since (2)2βˆ’2=0(\sqrt{2})^2 - 2 = 0)
  • By transitivity, Z[i,2]\mathbb{Z}[i, \sqrt{2}] is integral over Z\mathbb{Z}
TheoremFiniteness and Integrality

If RβŠ†SR \subseteq S with SS finitely generated as an RR-module, then SS is integral over RR.

Conversely, if SS is both integral over RR and finitely generated as an RR-algebra, then SS is finitely generated as an RR-module.

Remark

This theorem explains why "integral" and "finite" are nearly synonymous for ring extensions in algebraic geometry. A morphism of affine schemes is finite if it corresponds to an integral ring extension where the target is finitely generated as a module.

TheoremIntegral Closure in Localizations

If Rβ€Ύ\overline{R} is the integral closure of RR in SS and TT is a multiplicative set in RR, then Tβˆ’1Rβ€ΎT^{-1}\overline{R} is the integral closure of Tβˆ’1RT^{-1}R in Tβˆ’1ST^{-1}S.

Integrality behaves well under localization, allowing local-global principles for normality.

ExampleLocalization and Normality

If RR is normal (integrally closed in its fraction field), then RpR_\mathfrak{p} is normal for any prime p\mathfrak{p}.

Conversely, RR is normal if and only if RmR_\mathfrak{m} is normal for all maximal ideals m\mathfrak{m} (local criterion for normality).

DefinitionConductor Ideal

For RβŠ†SR \subseteq S integral with SS finitely generated as an RR-module, the conductor is: f={r∈R:rSβŠ†R}\mathfrak{f} = \{r \in R : rS \subseteq R\}

This measures "how far" SS is from RR. When RR is normal, the conductor captures the "ramification locus" in geometric terms.

These properties make integral extensions the natural setting for algebraic geometry over rings, generalizing field-theoretic algebraic geometry while maintaining crucial finiteness and closure properties.