Schlessinger's Theorem
Schlessinger's theorem (1968) provides necessary and sufficient conditions for a deformation functor to have a hull (pro-representable hull), and conditions for full pro-representability. It is the foundational result in formal deformation theory and underpins the local study of moduli problems.
1. Setup and Notation
Let be a field. Denote by the category of local Artinian -algebras with residue field . Morphisms are local -algebra homomorphisms. The ring of dual numbers is the simplest non-trivial object.
A functor of Artinian rings is a covariant functor with (a single point, the object being deformed). Such functors arise naturally from moduli problems by restricting to infinitesimal neighborhoods of a point.
The tangent space to is If satisfies condition (H2) below, carries a natural -vector space structure.
2. The Fiber Product Condition
The key technical tool is the analysis of fiber products in .
Given morphisms and in , the fiber product is The natural map on functors is
3. Schlessinger's Conditions
Let with and finite-dimensional. Consider the conditions:
(H1) For every fiber product diagram where is a small surjection, the natural map is surjective.
(H2) The above map is a bijection when and . (This gives a vector space structure.)
(H3) is finite-dimensional over .
(H4) For every small surjection , the map is a bijection.
Then:
- (H1) + (H2) + (H3) has a hull (miniversal formal deformation).
- (H1) + (H2) + (H3) + (H4) is pro-representable.
4. Hulls and Pro-Representability
A hull for is a pair where:
- is a complete local -algebra with residue field and finitely generated.
- is a compatible system (formal element).
- The induced morphism is smooth (i.e., surjective on all Artinian quotients with the lifting property for small extensions).
- The induced map on tangent spaces is an isomorphism.
is pro-representable if there exists a complete local -algebra with for all . This is stronger than having a hull: the morphism is an isomorphism (not just smooth).
5. Examples of Schlessinger's Conditions
For a smooth projective variety , the deformation functor satisfies:
- (H1): Follows from the deformation theory of smooth morphisms.
- (H2): The tangent space has a natural vector space structure.
- (H3): since is proper.
- (H4): Fails in general! Two deformations over that agree modulo a small extension need not be the same deformation.
So has a hull but is generally not pro-representable. It is pro-representable if and only if is injective (roughly, when automorphisms are "rigid").
Consider an elliptic curve with automorphism . Given a deformation over , the pullback is another deformation isomorphic to over (since lifts to any infinitesimal thickening). But and might be distinct elements of that become equal in . The fiber product must account for this, and (H4) fails because the isomorphism creates multiple elements mapping to the same pair.
Let define an isolated hypersurface singularity, and let be the functor of deformations of .
The tangent space is , the Tjurina algebra. For an isolated singularity, .
Condition (H4) holds because isolated singularities have trivial automorphisms in the formal category (the identity is the only automorphism fixing the singular point). So is pro-representable.
For the singularity (in ): The versal deformation is: The deformation ring is , a smooth (power series) ring. The discriminant locus where the singularity persists is defined by the discriminant of the polynomial .
For (the singularity in characteristic ): The versal deformation is: The deformation ring is smooth (no obstructions for curve singularities).
Let be the affine cone over an elliptic curve (a degree-3 cone in ). The singularity at the vertex has: which is 1-dimensional (only contributes, giving ).
The obstruction space (the singularity is a complete intersection), so the deformation is unobstructed and .
6. The Tangent-Obstruction Exact Sequence
For a functor satisfying (H1) and (H2), and a small extension , there is an exact sequence: where:
- acts freely and transitively on the fibers of (when nonempty).
- is the obstruction map.
- is the obstruction space.
The deformation ring has the form where and .
Mumford constructed a smooth projective surface in (a regular surface of degree 15 with ) whose deformation functor has: The surface is rigid (no deformations at all), yet the obstruction space is nonzero. This shows that the obstruction space can be "bigger than necessary."
7. Groupoid-Valued Version
For a functor (relevant for stacks), the analogous conditions are:
- (H1'): The natural functor is essentially surjective when is surjective.
- (H2'): It is an equivalence when .
- (H3'): and are finite-dimensional.
Under these conditions, admits a versal formal object (hull in the groupoid sense).
The deformation groupoid at a curve :
- for
Since , condition (H4') holds and the groupoid functor is pro-representable (by ). The stack structure at is the quotient .
For a vector bundle on a curve of genus :
- (by Riemann-Roch)
- (nontrivial! contains at least scalars)
- (curve has dimension 1)
The nonvanishing of means (H4') fails: has a hull but is not pro-representable as a groupoid functor. This reflects the Artin stack (not DM) nature of .
8. Relation to Artin's Criteria
Schlessinger's theorem works at the formal level (complete local rings). To go from formal to algebraic, one needs:
- Schlessinger's conditions existence of a formal hull.
- Grothendieck's existence theorem effectivity (formal algebraic).
- Openness of versality the versal family covers an open neighborhood.
Together, these give Artin's criteria. Schlessinger provides the infinitesimal foundation, and Artin's additional conditions bridge to the algebraic world.