Etale and fppf Topologies
The etale and fppf topologies are the two most important Grothendieck topologies in algebraic geometry beyond the Zariski topology. The etale topology is the algebraic analogue of the classical topology on complex manifolds, while the fppf topology is needed for studying inseparable phenomena, non-smooth group schemes, and descent in its most general form. Understanding these topologies is essential for the theory of algebraic stacks.
Etale Morphisms
A morphism of schemes is etale if it satisfies any of the following equivalent conditions:
- is flat and unramified.
- is flat, locally of finite presentation, and for every , the fiber is a disjoint union of spectra of finite separable field extensions of .
- is smooth of relative dimension .
- is locally of finite presentation, and for every affine open and affine open , the ring is a standard etale -algebra: where is a monic polynomial and is invertible in .
- (For schemes locally of finite type over a field ) is locally of finite type and formally etale: for every affine -scheme and every nilpotent ideal , the map is a bijection.
A morphism is etale if and only if is a finite separable field extension (or a finite product of such). The map is etale. The map is not etale (it is purely inseparable).
More generally, is finite etale if and only if is a finite projective -module and the trace form is non-degenerate.
The morphism is etale away from the prime (since the derivative is invertible away from ) but is not etale at (the polynomial has a repeated root modulo ... actually, and are the same modulo , so ).
So is finite etale of degree 2. The fiber over a prime splits into two points if is a square modulo (i.e., the Legendre symbol ).
Every open immersion is etale (it is flat, unramified, and locally of finite presentation). In fact, open immersions are precisely the etale morphisms that are also monomorphisms.
Conversely, an etale morphism of finite type between integral schemes with the same function field is an open immersion (by Zariski's main theorem).
Let be a smooth projective curve over an algebraically closed field , and let be a finite morphism of smooth curves. Then is etale if and only if is unramified, i.e., the ramification divisor is zero (every point has ramification index ).
By the Hurwitz formula , an etale cover of degree satisfies . For (genus ), no nontrivial etale covers exist when (since ). Over , Minkowski's theorem says there are no nontrivial unramified extensions, reflecting the same phenomenon.
A local ring is henselian if Hensel's lemma holds: for every monic polynomial , if in with , then with lifting .
Equivalently, is henselian if and only if every finite -algebra is a product of local rings, if and only if every etale neighborhood of the closed point has a section.
The strict henselization is the colimit of all local-etale -algebras, and the stalk of an etale sheaf at a geometric point over is where runs over etale neighborhoods, converging to .
The Etale Site and Etale Topology
The etale topology on the category (or on the small etale site ) is the Grothendieck topology where covering families are surjective families of etale morphisms:
Let be an elliptic curve over a field . For each integer with , the multiplication-by- map is a finite etale morphism of degree . Its kernel is (over ).
So is an etale cover. The induced map on etale fundamental groups gives the full Tate module: .
The etale covers of are classified by the etale fundamental group, which encodes both the geometric covers and the Galois action.
For over an algebraically closed field of characteristic , the etale fundamental group is trivial: . Every finite etale cover is trivial.
In characteristic , this fails dramatically: the Artin-Schreier cover is a connected etale -cover. The etale fundamental group of is huge (it surjects onto every finite group generated by at most one element at each prime-to- part, by Abhyankar's conjecture, proved by Raynaud and Harbater).
Flat Morphisms and the fppf Topology
A morphism of schemes is flat if for every with , the local ring map is flat (i.e., is a flat -module).
is faithfully flat if it is flat and surjective. Equivalently, the pullback functor on quasi-coherent sheaves is exact and faithful.
The fppf topology (fidelement plat de presentation finie) on declares a covering family if each is flat and locally of finite presentation, and is surjective.
The acronym "fppf" stands for "faithfully flat and of finite presentation" (referring to the joint morphism ).
The morphism is flat (and faithfully flat) for any ring , since is a free -module. The morphism is flat (and faithfully flat) since is free of rank as an -module.
More generally, any morphism corresponding to a flat ring map gives a flat morphism of schemes. Flatness is the scheme-theoretic analogue of "having fibers of constant dimension" (though this is a rough heuristic).
Over , the Frobenius morphism given by corresponds to the ring map sending . This makes a free -module of rank (via the basis ).
So the Frobenius is finite flat of degree , hence an fppf cover . However, it is not etale: it is totally inseparable (the fiber over any closed point is a single point with multiplicity ).
This is a key example showing what fppf detects that etale does not: inseparable maps and group schemes like .
Over a field of characteristic , the group scheme is not reduced (and not etale over ). The morphism given by has kernel .
The sequence is exact in the fppf topology but not in the etale topology. Over a field , classifies -torsors, which correspond to degree- purely inseparable extensions and Brauer-Severi varieties in certain cases. The etale cohomology gives only when is etale (i.e., when is invertible in , which contradicts ).
Comparison of Etale and fppf
For a smooth group scheme over , the etale and fppf cohomology agree:
This is a consequence of the fact that smooth morphisms locally (in the etale topology) have sections. So if is smooth, then -torsors that are locally trivial in the fppf topology are already locally trivial in the etale topology.
For non-smooth group schemes (, in characteristic , etc.), the etale and fppf cohomology genuinely differ, and the fppf topology is essential.
The Brauer group can be defined as (etale cohomology) or as the group of Azumaya algebras modulo Brauer equivalence.
The etale and fppf agree for : . This is because is smooth, so the comparison theorem applies.
For a field , classifies central simple algebras over up to Morita equivalence. For example, (generated by the quaternions ), (Wedderburn), and (local class field theory).
For any scheme , the Picard group . All three topologies give the same answer.
This equality for is essentially Hilbert's Theorem 90: for the etale case, it says for any Galois extension . For the fppf case, it generalizes to say that every -torsor in the fppf topology is already locally trivial in the Zariski topology.
However, for higher cohomology, the topologies may differ. For example, and can differ for non-smooth coefficient sheaves.
Etale and fppf Covers in Practice
Consider the etale cover given by the inclusion (adjoin a square root of ). This is a degree-2 etale cover of by .
The fiber product is . The tensor product (where ) is , which splits as (identifying or ).
This is characteristic of a Galois cover: the fiber product over itself splits as copies indexed by the Galois group .
Let over a field with . A -torsor over is a scheme with a -action that is locally trivial. These are classified by .
Concretely, each class gives the torsor with -action (where ). The torsor is trivial (isomorphic to itself) if and only if is a square in .
For , , which is infinite (generated by and the primes ).
Properties of Etale and Flat Morphisms
Both etale and flat morphisms have excellent stability properties:
Etale morphisms:
- Stable under base change: if is etale and , then is etale.
- Stable under composition: etale if both and are etale.
- Local on the target: is etale iff it is etale over an open cover of .
- Local on the source: if is an etale cover and each is etale, then is etale.
- Etale morphisms are open maps (like local homeomorphisms in topology).
Flat morphisms:
- Stable under base change and composition.
- Flat morphisms are open (Chevalley's theorem).
- If is flat and locally of finite presentation, and is locally Noetherian, then is an open map.
- "Going down" holds for flat morphisms: if in and lies over , then there exists lying over .
Summary
| Property | Zariski | Etale | fppf | fpqc | |----------|---------|-------|------|------| | Cover morphisms | Open immersions | Etale, surjective | Flat, fin. pres., surj. | Flat, surjective, q.c. | | Detects | Zariski-local data | Galois/separable data | All flat data | All faithfully flat data | | | | | | | | | Zar. v.b. | Etale v.b. | All v.b. | All v.b. | | Good for smooth | Sometimes | Yes | Yes | Yes | | Good for non-smooth | No | No | Yes | Yes | | Descent for qcoh sheaves | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
The etale topology is the workhorse for arithmetic geometry (Galois representations, -adic cohomology, Weil conjectures). The fppf topology is needed for moduli of non-smooth objects and torsors under non-smooth group schemes. The fpqc topology is the natural setting for descent theory but is rarely used for cohomology computations.