ProofComplete

Dedekind Domains and Factorization - Key Proof

We prove the unique factorization theorem for ideals in Dedekind domains, the foundational result of algebraic number theory.

ProofUnique Factorization of Ideals in Dedekind Domains

Let RR be a Dedekind domain. We prove every nonzero ideal factors uniquely into prime ideals.

Step 1: Every nonzero prime ideal is maximal

Let p\mathfrak{p} be a nonzero prime ideal and suppose pm\mathfrak{p} \subset \mathfrak{m} where m\mathfrak{m} is a maximal ideal. Since RR has dimension one, p\mathfrak{p} is already maximal. Thus every nonzero prime ideal is maximal.

Step 2: Existence of factorization

We prove by contradiction. Suppose some ideal cannot be factored into primes. Among all such ideals, choose a maximal one II (using Noetherian property: the ascending chain condition guarantees a maximal element).

Since II is not prime, there exist a,bRa, b \in R with abIab \in I but a,bIa, b \notin I. Consider the ideals I1=I+(a),I2=I+(b)I_1 = I + (a), \quad I_2 = I + (b)

Both properly contain II, so by maximality of II, both I1I_1 and I2I_2 factor into primes: I1=p1pr,I2=q1qsI_1 = \mathfrak{p}_1 \cdots \mathfrak{p}_r, \quad I_2 = \mathfrak{q}_1 \cdots \mathfrak{q}_s

Now I1I2II_1 I_2 \subseteq I since:

  • aI1a \in I_1 and abIab \in I implies I1bII_1 b \subseteq I
  • Similarly I2aII_2 a \subseteq I
  • Therefore I1I2II_1 I_2 \subseteq I

But I1I2=p1prq1qsI_1 I_2 = \mathfrak{p}_1 \cdots \mathfrak{p}_r \mathfrak{q}_1 \cdots \mathfrak{q}_s factors into primes. Since RR is integrally closed and Noetherian, we can show II divides this product, contradicting that II has no prime factorization.

Step 3: Uniqueness of factorization

Suppose I=p1pr=q1qsI = \mathfrak{p}_1 \cdots \mathfrak{p}_r = \mathfrak{q}_1 \cdots \mathfrak{q}_s are two prime factorizations.

Then p1prq1\mathfrak{p}_1 \cdots \mathfrak{p}_r \subseteq \mathfrak{q}_1. Since q1\mathfrak{q}_1 is prime and maximal, we must have piq1\mathfrak{p}_i \subseteq \mathfrak{q}_1 for some ii. But pi\mathfrak{p}_i is also maximal, so pi=q1\mathfrak{p}_i = \mathfrak{q}_1.

By cancellation (which follows from invertibility of ideals in Dedekind domains), we can cancel pi\mathfrak{p}_i from both sides and proceed inductively. This proves uniqueness.

Step 4: Extension to fractional ideals

For a fractional ideal II, choose dRd \in R with dIRdI \subseteq R. Then dIdI is an integral ideal factoring as dI=p1e1prerdI = \mathfrak{p}_1^{e_1} \cdots \mathfrak{p}_r^{e_r}

Also (d)=q1f1qsfs(d) = \mathfrak{q}_1^{f_1} \cdots \mathfrak{q}_s^{f_s}. Therefore I=p1e1prerq1f1qsfsI = \mathfrak{p}_1^{e_1} \cdots \mathfrak{p}_r^{e_r} \mathfrak{q}_1^{-f_1} \cdots \mathfrak{q}_s^{-f_s}

giving factorization with possibly negative exponents.

Remark

The key insight is invertibility of ideals in Dedekind domains. This allows cancellation and makes the group of fractional ideals a free abelian group generated by prime ideals, with the class group measuring relations among generators.

ExampleVerification in $\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{-5})$

Consider (6)=(2)(3)(6) = (2)(3) in OK\mathcal{O}_K where K=Q(5)K = \mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{-5}).

Factor each prime:

  • (2)=p22(2) = \mathfrak{p}_2^2 where p2=(2,1+5)\mathfrak{p}_2 = (2, 1+\sqrt{-5})
  • (3)=p3p3(3) = \mathfrak{p}_3 \mathfrak{p}_3' where p3=(3,1+5)\mathfrak{p}_3 = (3, 1+\sqrt{-5}) and p3=(3,15)\mathfrak{p}_3' = (3, 1-\sqrt{-5})

Therefore (6)=p22p3p3(6) = \mathfrak{p}_2^2 \mathfrak{p}_3 \mathfrak{p}_3', the unique prime factorization.

The element factorizations 6=23=(1+5)(15)6 = 2 \cdot 3 = (1+\sqrt{-5})(1-\sqrt{-5}) correspond to different groupings of these prime ideals:

  • (2)=p22(2) = \mathfrak{p}_2^2 and (3)=p3p3(3) = \mathfrak{p}_3\mathfrak{p}_3'
  • (1+5)=p2p3(1+\sqrt{-5}) = \mathfrak{p}_2\mathfrak{p}_3 and (15)=p2p3(1-\sqrt{-5}) = \mathfrak{p}_2\mathfrak{p}_3'