ConceptComplete

Quillen's Plus Construction

Quillen's plus construction is one of the two main approaches to defining higher algebraic K-groups. It modifies the classifying space BGL(R)BGL(R) by killing its fundamental group (which is GL(R)GL(R)) down to the abelianization K1(R)K_1(R), while preserving homology. The resulting space BGL(R)+BGL(R)^+ has homotopy groups that define the higher K-groups.


The plus construction in general

Definition2.1Quillen's plus construction

Let XX be a connected CW complex and NβŠ΄Ο€1(X)N \trianglelefteq \pi_1(X) a perfect normal subgroup (i.e., N=[N,N]N = [N, N]). The plus construction XN+X^+_N (or simply X+X^+ when NN is understood) is a CW complex together with a map Ο•:Xβ†’X+\phi: X \to X^+ satisfying:

  1. Ο•βˆ—:Ο€1(X)β†’Ο€1(X+)\phi_*: \pi_1(X) \to \pi_1(X^+) is the quotient map Ο€1(X)β† Ο€1(X)/N\pi_1(X) \twoheadrightarrow \pi_1(X)/N.
  2. Ο•βˆ—:Hβˆ—(X;M)β†’βˆΌHβˆ—(X+;M)\phi_*: H_*(X; M) \xrightarrow{\sim} H_*(X^+; M) is an isomorphism for every Ο€1(X)/N\pi_1(X)/N-module MM (equivalently, for every local coefficient system on X+X^+).

The plus construction is unique up to homotopy equivalence (under XX) when it exists. It exists whenever NN is perfect.

RemarkConstruction via attaching cells

The plus construction is built by:

  1. Killing Ο€1\pi_1: For each generator gg of NN, attach a 2-cell along a loop representing gg. This kills NN in Ο€1\pi_1, giving a space Xβ€²X' with Ο€1(Xβ€²)=Ο€1(X)/N\pi_1(X') = \pi_1(X)/N.

  2. Fixing homology: The 2-cells introduce classes in H2H_2 that were not present. Since NN is perfect, these can be killed by attaching 3-cells without affecting Ο€1\pi_1 or lower homology.

Formally, one shows that the attaching maps for the 3-cells can be chosen so that the resulting space X+X^+ satisfies Hβˆ—(X;Z)β‰…Hβˆ—(X+;Z)H_*(X; \mathbb{Z}) \cong H_*(X^+; \mathbb{Z}) as abelian groups (and more generally for local coefficients).


Application to K-theory

Definition2.2Higher algebraic K-groups via plus construction

For a ring RR, the group E(R)=[GL(R),GL(R)]E(R) = [GL(R), GL(R)] is perfect (this follows from the Steinberg relations). Apply the plus construction to the classifying space BGL(R)BGL(R) with N=E(R)N = E(R):

Kn(R)=Ο€n(BGL(R)+)forΒ nβ‰₯1.K_n(R) = \pi_n(BGL(R)^+) \quad \text{for } n \geq 1.

By construction:

  • Ο€1(BGL(R)+)=GL(R)/E(R)=K1(R)\pi_1(BGL(R)^+) = GL(R)/E(R) = K_1(R)
  • Hβˆ—(BGL(R)+;Z)β‰…Hβˆ—(BGL(R);Z)=Hβˆ—(GL(R);Z)H_*(BGL(R)^+; \mathbb{Z}) \cong H_*(BGL(R); \mathbb{Z}) = H_*(GL(R); \mathbb{Z})

For n=0n = 0, we retain the original definition K0(R)=K_0(R) = Grothendieck group of projective modules. The K-theory space is

K(R)=K0(R)Γ—BGL(R)+K(R) = K_0(R) \times BGL(R)^+

so that Ο€n(K(R))=Kn(R)\pi_n(K(R)) = K_n(R) for all nβ‰₯0n \geq 0 (where Ο€0=K0\pi_0 = K_0).

ExampleK-groups of finite fields

Quillen computed the K-groups of finite fields completely. For Fq\mathbb{F}_q with q=pfq = p^f:

Kn(Fq)={Zn=0Z/(qiβˆ’1)Zn=2iβˆ’1>00nΒ even,n>0K_n(\mathbb{F}_q) = \begin{cases} \mathbb{Z} & n = 0 \\ \mathbb{Z}/(q^i - 1)\mathbb{Z} & n = 2i - 1 > 0 \\ 0 & n \text{ even}, n > 0 \end{cases}

The computation uses the fact that BGL(Fq)+≃FψqBGL(\mathbb{F}_q)^+ \simeq F\psi^q, the homotopy fiber of ψqβˆ’1:BUβ†’BU\psi^q - 1: BU \to BU, where ψq\psi^q is the Adams operation. This connects algebraic K-theory to topological K-theory.

For example: K1(Fq)=FqΓ—β‰…Z/(qβˆ’1)K_1(\mathbb{F}_q) = \mathbb{F}_q^{\times} \cong \mathbb{Z}/(q-1), K3(Fq)β‰…Z/(q2βˆ’1)K_3(\mathbb{F}_q) \cong \mathbb{Z}/(q^2 - 1).


Properties of the plus construction

ExampleGroup completion interpretation

The plus construction can be understood via group completion of the monoid

∐nβ‰₯0BGLn(R)\coprod_{n \geq 0} BGL_n(R)

under the HH-space structure induced by direct sum βŠ•:GLm(R)Γ—GLn(R)β†’GLm+n(R)\oplus: GL_m(R) \times GL_n(R) \to GL_{m+n}(R).

The group completion theorem (McDuff--Segal) states that

ZΓ—BGL(R)+≃ΩB(∐nBGLn(R))\mathbb{Z} \times BGL(R)^+ \simeq \Omega B\left(\coprod_n BGL_n(R)\right)

where the right side is the loop space of the classifying space of the topological monoid. This provides the connection between the plus construction and the more homotopy-theoretic approaches to K-theory.

RemarkComparison with Kβ‚‚

For n=2n = 2, the plus construction gives K2(R)=Ο€2(BGL(R)+)K_2(R) = \pi_2(BGL(R)^+). Since BGL(R)BGL(R) is a K(GL(R),1)K(GL(R), 1), we have Ο€2(BGL(R))=0\pi_2(BGL(R)) = 0. The plus construction introduces new Ο€2\pi_2 from the attached 2-cells. One can show

K2(R)=Ο€2(BGL(R)+)β‰…H2(E(R);Z)β‰…ker⁑(St⁑(R)β†’E(R))K_2(R) = \pi_2(BGL(R)^+) \cong H_2(E(R); \mathbb{Z}) \cong \ker(\operatorname{St}(R) \to E(R))

recovering Milnor's definition. The isomorphism K2(R)β‰…H2(E(R);Z)K_2(R) \cong H_2(E(R); \mathbb{Z}) follows from the Hopf formula: for a perfect group GG with universal central extension G~\tilde{G}, Ο€2(BG+)β‰…H2(G;Z)β‰…ker⁑(G~β†’G)\pi_2(BG^+) \cong H_2(G; \mathbb{Z}) \cong \ker(\tilde{G} \to G).