TheoremComplete

Matsumoto's Theorem

Matsumoto's theorem provides an explicit presentation of K2(F)K_2(F) for any field FF, showing that it is generated by Steinberg symbols subject only to the bimultiplicativity and Steinberg relations. This result is foundational for Milnor K-theory and connects algebraic K-theory to classical symbol maps in number theory.


Statement

Theorem1.2Matsumoto's Theorem

For any field FF, the group K2(F)K_2(F) admits the presentation

K2(F)β‰…FΓ—βŠ—ZFΓ—βŸ¨aβŠ—(1βˆ’a):a∈Fβˆ–{0,1}⟩.K_2(F) \cong \frac{F^{\times} \otimes_{\mathbb{Z}} F^{\times}}{\langle a \otimes (1-a) : a \in F \setminus \{0, 1\} \rangle}.

Equivalently, K2(F)K_2(F) is the abelian group generated by symbols {a,b}\{a, b\} for a,b∈FΓ—a, b \in F^{\times}, subject to:

  1. Bimultiplicativity: {ab,c}={a,c}{b,c}\{ab, c\} = \{a, c\}\{b, c\} and {a,bc}={a,b}{a,c}\{a, bc\} = \{a, b\}\{a, c\}
  2. Steinberg relation: {a,1βˆ’a}=1\{a, 1 - a\} = 1 for all a∈Fβˆ–{0,1}a \in F \setminus \{0, 1\}

The symbol map FΓ—Γ—FΓ—β†’K2(F)F^{\times} \times F^{\times} \to K_2(F), (a,b)↦{a,b}(a, b) \mapsto \{a, b\}, is the universal Steinberg symbol.


Consequences of the symbol relations

RemarkDerived identities

From bimultiplicativity and the Steinberg relation, one derives:

  1. Antisymmetry: {a,b}=βˆ’{b,a}\{a, b\} = -\{b, a\} for all a,b∈FΓ—a, b \in F^{\times}.

    Proof: From a+b=a(1βˆ’(βˆ’b/a))a + b = a(1 - (-b/a)), the Steinberg relation on βˆ’b/a-b/a gives {βˆ’b/a,1+b/a}=1\{-b/a, 1 + b/a\} = 1. Expanding by bimultiplicativity and simplifying yields {a,b}{b,a}={βˆ’1,βˆ’1}0=1\{a, b\}\{b, a\} = \{-1, -1\}^0 = 1 after careful manipulation.

  2. {a,βˆ’a}=1\{a, -a\} = 1: Set b=βˆ’ab = -a in the identity {a,1βˆ’a}=1\{a, 1-a\} = 1 applied to the element a/(a+b)a/(a+b) (when a+bβ‰ 0a + b \neq 0).

  3. {a,a}={a,βˆ’1}\{a, a\} = \{a, -1\}: From {a,βˆ’a}=1\{a, -a\} = 1, we get {a,a}{a,βˆ’1}={a,βˆ’a}=1\{a, a\}\{a, -1\} = \{a, -a\} = 1.

  4. {βˆ’1,βˆ’1}\{-1, -1\} has order dividing 2: From {βˆ’1,βˆ’1}={βˆ’1,βˆ’1}βˆ’1\{-1, -1\} = \{-1, -1\}^{-1} using antisymmetry.


Proof sketch

Proof

The proof that K2(F)=ker⁑(St⁑(F)β†’E(F))K_2(F) = \ker(\operatorname{St}(F) \to E(F)) is generated by Steinberg symbols proceeds in several steps.

Step 1: The symbols lie in K2(F)K_2(F). For a,b∈FΓ—a, b \in F^{\times}, define {a,b}∈St⁑(F)\{a, b\} \in \operatorname{St}(F) using the Steinberg generators. One verifies that Ο•({a,b})=1∈E(F)\phi(\{a, b\}) = 1 \in E(F), so {a,b}∈K2(F)=ker⁑ϕ\{a, b\} \in K_2(F) = \ker \phi.

Step 2: Universality. Consider any Steinberg symbol, i.e., a bimultiplicative map c:FΓ—Γ—FΓ—β†’Ac: F^{\times} \times F^{\times} \to A (abelian group) satisfying c(a,1βˆ’a)=0c(a, 1-a) = 0. We must show cc factors through K2(F)K_2(F).

Step 3: Reduction to the Dennis--Stein symbols. Define elements ⟨a,b⟩∈St⁑(F)\langle a, b \rangle \in \operatorname{St}(F) for a,b∈Fa, b \in F with 1+abβ‰ 01 + ab \neq 0:

⟨a,b⟩=x12(a) x21(b(1+ab)βˆ’1) x12(βˆ’a(1+ab)βˆ’1(1+ba))β‹…h12(1+ab)βˆ’1.\langle a, b \rangle = x_{12}(a) \, x_{21}(b(1+ab)^{-1}) \, x_{12}(-a(1+ab)^{-1}(1+ba)) \cdot h_{12}(1+ab)^{-1}.

These satisfy simpler relations than the Steinberg symbols and generate K2(F)K_2(F).

Step 4: Presentation via Dennis--Stein symbols. Every element of K2(F)K_2(F) is a product of Dennis--Stein symbols. Each Dennis--Stein symbol ⟨a,b⟩\langle a, b \rangle with abβ‰ 0ab \neq 0 can be expressed as a product of Steinberg symbols:

⟨a,b⟩={βˆ’(1+ab),abβˆ’1(1+ab)βˆ’1}β‹…(correctionΒ terms).\langle a, b \rangle = \{-(1 + ab), ab^{-1}(1+ab)^{-1}\} \cdot (\text{correction terms}).

Step 5: Verifying the Steinberg relation. The identity {a,1βˆ’a}=1\{a, 1-a\} = 1 in K2(F)K_2(F) follows from the Steinberg relations in St⁑(F)\operatorname{St}(F): the specific element {a,1βˆ’a}\{a, 1-a\} maps to the identity matrix in E(F)E(F) and can be shown to equal 11 in St⁑(F)\operatorname{St}(F) by direct computation.

Step 6: No extra relations. This is the hardest part. One shows that any central element of St⁑(F)\operatorname{St}(F) can be expressed as a product of symbols, using the structure theory of St⁑(F)\operatorname{St}(F) as a central extension and properties of BNBN-pairs. β–‘\square

β– 

Applications

ExampleHilbert reciprocity via Kβ‚‚

For a number field FF with places vv, the tame symbol maps assemble into

K2(F)β†’βŠ•vβˆ‚v⨁vk(v)Γ—K_2(F) \xrightarrow{\oplus_v \partial_v} \bigoplus_v k(v)^{\times}

where k(v)k(v) is the residue field at vv. Moore's reciprocity theorem states that for the composite

K2(F)→⨁vK2(Fv)β†’βŠ•inv⁑vQ/ZK_2(F) \to \bigoplus_v K_2(F_v) \xrightarrow{\oplus \operatorname{inv}_v} \mathbb{Q}/\mathbb{Z}

the image is zero: βˆ‘vinv⁑v({a,b}v)=0\sum_v \operatorname{inv}_v(\{a, b\}_v) = 0 for all a,b∈FΓ—a, b \in F^{\times}. This is the K-theoretic formulation of global reciprocity.

ExampleConnection to the Brauer group

For a field FF containing nn-th roots of unity ΞΌn\mu_n, the norm residue symbol gives a map

K2(F)/nK2(F)β†’Br⁑(F)[n]K_2(F)/nK_2(F) \to \operatorname{Br}(F)[n]

sending {a,b}\{a, b\} to the class of the cyclic algebra (a,b)n(a, b)_n. The Merkurjev--Suslin theorem shows this map is an isomorphism:

K2(F)/nK2(F)β‰…H2(F,ΞΌnβŠ—2).K_2(F)/nK_2(F) \cong H^2(F, \mu_n^{\otimes 2}).

This was the first major case of the Bloch--Kato conjecture.