ConceptComplete

Kβ‚‚ and the Steinberg Group

The group K2(R)K_2(R), introduced by Milnor, measures the non-obvious relations among elementary matrices. It is defined via the Steinberg group and connects algebraic K-theory to central extensions, Brauer groups, and reciprocity laws in number theory.


The Steinberg group

Definition1.8Steinberg group

The Steinberg group St⁑n(R)\operatorname{St}_n(R) is the group with generators xij(Ξ»)x_{ij}(\lambda) for 1≀iβ‰ j≀n1 \leq i \neq j \leq n and λ∈R\lambda \in R, subject to the Steinberg relations:

  1. xij(Ξ»)β‹…xij(ΞΌ)=xij(Ξ»+ΞΌ)x_{ij}(\lambda) \cdot x_{ij}(\mu) = x_{ij}(\lambda + \mu)
  2. [xij(λ),xjk(μ)]=xik(λμ)[x_{ij}(\lambda), x_{jk}(\mu)] = x_{ik}(\lambda\mu) for i,j,ki, j, k distinct
  3. [xij(λ),xkl(μ)]=1[x_{ij}(\lambda), x_{kl}(\mu)] = 1 for j≠kj \neq k and i≠li \neq l

The stable Steinberg group is St⁑(R)=lim→⁑nSt⁑n(R)\operatorname{St}(R) = \varinjlim_n \operatorname{St}_n(R).

There is a natural surjection Ο•:St⁑(R)β† E(R)\phi: \operatorname{St}(R) \twoheadrightarrow E(R) sending xij(Ξ»)↦eij(Ξ»)x_{ij}(\lambda) \mapsto e_{ij}(\lambda).

Definition1.9Kβ‚‚ of a ring

The second algebraic K-group is

K2(R)=ker⁑(Ο•:St⁑(R)β†’E(R)).K_2(R) = \ker\bigl(\phi: \operatorname{St}(R) \to E(R)\bigr).

This is the center of St⁑(R)\operatorname{St}(R), and the sequence

1β†’K2(R)β†’St⁑(R)β†’E(R)β†’11 \to K_2(R) \to \operatorname{St}(R) \to E(R) \to 1

is the universal central extension of the perfect group E(R)E(R). Thus K2(R)=H2(E(R);Z)=H2(GL(R);Z)K_2(R) = H_2(E(R); \mathbb{Z}) = H_2(GL(R); \mathbb{Z}).


Symbols and computations

Definition1.10Steinberg symbol

For a commutative ring RR and units a,b∈RΓ—a, b \in R^{\times}, the Steinberg symbol {a,b}∈K2(R)\{a, b\} \in K_2(R) is defined as

{a,b}=h12(a) h12(b) h12(ab)βˆ’1\{a, b\} = h_{12}(a) \, h_{12}(b) \, h_{12}(ab)^{-1}

where hij(u)=wij(u) wij(βˆ’1)h_{ij}(u) = w_{ij}(u) \, w_{ij}(-1) and wij(u)=xij(u) xji(βˆ’uβˆ’1) xij(u)w_{ij}(u) = x_{ij}(u) \, x_{ji}(-u^{-1}) \, x_{ij}(u) for u∈RΓ—u \in R^{\times}.

The Steinberg symbol is bimultiplicative and antisymmetric:

  • {ab,c}={a,c}{b,c}\{ab, c\} = \{a, c\}\{b, c\} and {a,bc}={a,b}{a,c}\{a, bc\} = \{a, b\}\{a, c\}
  • {a,b}={b,a}βˆ’1\{a, b\} = \{b, a\}^{-1}
  • {a,1βˆ’a}=1\{a, 1-a\} = 1 for a,1βˆ’a∈RΓ—a, 1-a \in R^{\times} (the Steinberg identity)
ExampleKβ‚‚ of a field (Matsumoto's theorem)

For a field FF, Matsumoto's theorem states that K2(F)K_2(F) is the abelian group generated by symbols {a,b}\{a, b\} for a,b∈FΓ—a, b \in F^{\times}, subject to:

  1. Bimultiplicativity: {ab,c}={a,c}{b,c}\{ab, c\} = \{a, c\}\{b, c\}
  2. Steinberg relation: {a,1βˆ’a}=1\{a, 1-a\} = 1 for aβ‰ 0,1a \neq 0, 1

Thus K2(F)=(FΓ—βŠ—ZFΓ—)/⟨aβŠ—(1βˆ’a):aβ‰ 0,1⟩K_2(F) = (F^{\times} \otimes_{\mathbb{Z}} F^{\times}) / \langle a \otimes (1-a) : a \neq 0, 1 \rangle.

Computations:

  • K2(Fq)=0K_2(\mathbb{F}_q) = 0 for all finite fields Fq\mathbb{F}_q (every symbol is trivial)
  • K2(R)K_2(\mathbb{R}) contains {βˆ’1,βˆ’1}\{-1, -1\} of order 2 (related to the real Brauer group)
  • K2(Q)K_2(\mathbb{Q}) is large: K2(Q)β‰…{+1,βˆ’1}βŠ•β¨pFpΓ—K_2(\mathbb{Q}) \cong \{+1, -1\} \oplus \bigoplus_p \mathbb{F}_p^{\times}

The Hilbert symbol and reciprocity

ExampleConnection to the Hilbert symbol

For a local field FF (e.g., Qp\mathbb{Q}_p or R\mathbb{R}), the tame symbol provides a homomorphism

βˆ‚:K2(F)β†’kΓ—\partial: K_2(F) \to k^{\times}

where kk is the residue field. For F=QpF = \mathbb{Q}_p with uniformizer pp:

βˆ‚({pau,pbv})=(βˆ’1)abubvβˆ’amod  p\partial(\{p^a u, p^b v\}) = (-1)^{ab} u^b v^{-a} \mod p

for u,v∈ZpΓ—u, v \in \mathbb{Z}_p^{\times}.

The Hilbert symbol (a,b)v∈{Β±1}(a, b)_v \in \{\pm 1\} for a,b∈QvΓ—a, b \in \mathbb{Q}_v^{\times} is defined by (a,b)v=1(a, b)_v = 1 iff ax2+by2=z2ax^2 + by^2 = z^2 has a nontrivial solution in Qv\mathbb{Q}_v. It factors through K2(Qv)K_2(\mathbb{Q}_v) via

K2(Qv)β†’ΞΌ2,{a,b}↦(a,b)v.K_2(\mathbb{Q}_v) \to \mu_2, \quad \{a, b\} \mapsto (a, b)_v.

Hilbert reciprocity: ∏v(a,b)v=1\prod_v (a, b)_v = 1 for all a,b∈QΓ—a, b \in \mathbb{Q}^{\times}, where vv ranges over all places of Q\mathbb{Q}. This is equivalent to quadratic reciprocity and is a shadow of the reciprocity map in class field theory.


Kβ‚‚ of number fields

RemarkTate's computation and Garland's theorem

For a number field FF with ring of integers OF\mathcal{O}_F:

  • Garland's theorem: K2(OF)K_2(\mathcal{O}_F) is finite.
  • Tate's computation: K2(Z)β‰…Z/2ZK_2(\mathbb{Z}) \cong \mathbb{Z}/2\mathbb{Z}, generated by {βˆ’1,βˆ’1}\{-1, -1\}.
  • More generally, K2(OF)K_2(\mathcal{O}_F) is related to the Brauer group and class field theory.

The Quillen--Lichtenbaum conjecture (now largely proved via motivic cohomology) relates K2(OF)K_2(\mathcal{O}_F) to special values of Dedekind zeta functions. For a totally real field:

∣K2(OF)∣∼QΓ—ΞΆF(βˆ’1)|K_2(\mathcal{O}_F)| \sim_{\mathbb{Q}^{\times}} \zeta_F(-1)

(up to powers of 2), connecting algebraic K-theory to analytic number theory.

ExampleKβ‚‚(β„€) = β„€/2β„€

The group K2(Z)β‰…Z/2ZK_2(\mathbb{Z}) \cong \mathbb{Z}/2\mathbb{Z} is generated by {βˆ’1,βˆ’1}\{-1, -1\}. To see this is nontrivial, we use the Hilbert symbol at the real place: (βˆ’1,βˆ’1)∞=βˆ’1(-1, -1)_{\infty} = -1 since βˆ’x2βˆ’y2=z2-x^2 - y^2 = z^2 has no nontrivial real solution.

The computation uses the exact sequence from the localization sequence:

K2(Z)β†’K2(Q)β†’βŠ•βˆ‚p⨁pFpΓ—β†’K1(Z)β†’K1(Q)K_2(\mathbb{Z}) \to K_2(\mathbb{Q}) \xrightarrow{\oplus \partial_p} \bigoplus_p \mathbb{F}_p^{\times} \to K_1(\mathbb{Z}) \to K_1(\mathbb{Q})

combined with careful analysis of tame symbols. Bass and Tate showed K2(Z)={1,{βˆ’1,βˆ’1}}K_2(\mathbb{Z}) = \{1, \{-1,-1\}\}.