ConceptComplete

T0, T1, and T2 (Hausdorff) Spaces

The separation axioms form a hierarchy of increasingly strong conditions that control how well a topology can distinguish between points and closed sets. The first three levels -- T0T_0, T1T_1, and T2T_2 -- concern the separation of distinct points.


The Kolmogorov Axiom (T0T_0)

Definition6.1$T_0$ Space

A topological space XX is T0T_0 (or Kolmogorov) if for every pair of distinct points xβ‰ yx \neq y, there exists an open set containing one but not the other. That is, the topology distinguishes points: xβ‰ yβ€…β€ŠβŸΉβ€…β€ŠβˆƒUβˆˆΟ„,(x∈U,yβˆ‰U)Β orΒ (y∈U,xβˆ‰U)x \neq y \implies \exists U \in \tau, (x \in U, y \notin U) \text{ or } (y \in U, x \notin U).

Example$T_0$ Examples
  • The Sierpinski space {0,1}\{0, 1\} with topology {βˆ…,{0},{0,1}}\{\emptyset, \{0\}, \{0, 1\}\} is T0T_0 but not T1T_1: the point 11 has no open set separating it from 00.
  • Any T1T_1 space is T0T_0.
  • The indiscrete topology on a set with more than one point is not T0T_0.

The Fr'echet Axiom (T1T_1)

Definition6.2$T_1$ Space

A topological space XX is T1T_1 (or Fr'echet or accessible) if for every pair of distinct points xβ‰ yx \neq y, each has a neighborhood not containing the other. That is: βˆ€xβ‰ y,β€…β€ŠβˆƒU,VβˆˆΟ„:x∈U,yβˆ‰U,y∈V,xβˆ‰V.\forall x \neq y, \; \exists U, V \in \tau : x \in U, y \notin U, y \in V, x \notin V.

Theorem6.1Characterizations of $T_1$

The following are equivalent for a topological space XX:

  1. XX is T1T_1.
  2. Every singleton {x}\{x\} is closed.
  3. Every finite subset of XX is closed.
  4. For each x∈Xx \in X, {x}=β‹‚{U:UΒ open,x∈U}\{x\} = \bigcap\{U : U \text{ open}, x \in U\}.
Proof

(1 β‡’\Rightarrow 2): For yβ‰ xy \neq x, there exists an open set UyU_y with y∈Uyy \in U_y and xβˆ‰Uyx \notin U_y. Then Xβˆ–{x}=⋃yβ‰ xUyX \setminus \{x\} = \bigcup_{y \neq x} U_y is open, so {x}\{x\} is closed.

(2 β‡’\Rightarrow 3): Finite unions of closed sets are closed.

(3 β‡’\Rightarrow 1): Given xβ‰ yx \neq y, the set Xβˆ–{y}X \setminus \{y\} is open (since {y}\{y\} is closed) and contains xx but not yy. Similarly, Xβˆ–{x}X \setminus \{x\} is open and contains yy but not xx.

(2 ⇔\Leftrightarrow 4): {x}=β‹‚{U:x∈U}\{x\} = \bigcap\{U : x \in U\} iff for every yβ‰ xy \neq x there is an open set containing xx but not yy, which together with the analogue for the other point gives the result (since singletons being closed is equivalent).

β– 

The Hausdorff Axiom (T2T_2)

Definition6.3$T_2$ (Hausdorff) Space

A topological space XX is T2T_2 (or Hausdorff) if for every pair of distinct points xβ‰ yx \neq y, there exist disjoint open sets U,VU, V with x∈Ux \in U and y∈Vy \in V: βˆ€xβ‰ y,β€…β€ŠβˆƒU,VβˆˆΟ„:x∈U,y∈V,U∩V=βˆ….\forall x \neq y, \; \exists U, V \in \tau : x \in U, y \in V, U \cap V = \emptyset.

RemarkThe Hausdorff Condition is Very Common

Most spaces encountered in analysis and geometry are Hausdorff:

  • All metric spaces are Hausdorff (U=B(x,d/2)U = B(x, d/2), V=B(y,d/2)V = B(y, d/2) where d=d(x,y)>0d = d(x, y) > 0).
  • All manifolds are Hausdorff (by definition in most conventions).
  • All subspaces and products of Hausdorff spaces are Hausdorff.
  • Quotient spaces of Hausdorff spaces need not be Hausdorff.
ExampleHausdorff and Non-Hausdorff Examples

Hausdorff: Rn\mathbb{R}^n, SnS^n, all metric spaces, all manifolds, R\mathbb{R} with the lower limit topology.

T1T_1 but not Hausdorff: The cofinite topology on an infinite set. Singletons are closed (so T1T_1), but any two nonempty open sets intersect (their complements are finite, so they cannot be disjoint).

Not T1T_1: The Sierpinski space.


Consequences of the Hausdorff Property

Theorem6.2Properties of Hausdorff Spaces

Let XX be a Hausdorff space.

  1. Limits of sequences are unique: If xn→xx_n \to x and xn→yx_n \to y, then x=yx = y.
  2. The diagonal Ξ”={(x,x)}\Delta = \{(x, x)\} is closed in XΓ—XX \times X.
  3. Compact subsets are closed (Theorem 5.16).
  4. Continuous maps into Hausdorff spaces are determined by their values on a dense subset: if f,g:Xβ†’Yf, g: X \to Y are continuous, YY is Hausdorff, and f∣D=g∣Df|_D = g|_D for a dense DβŠ†XD \subseteq X, then f=gf = g.
Proof

(1): If xβ‰ yx \neq y, choose disjoint open Uβˆ‹xU \ni x and Vβˆ‹yV \ni y. Then xn∈Ux_n \in U for large nn and xn∈Vx_n \in V for large nn, contradicting U∩V=βˆ…U \cap V = \emptyset.

(2): Let (x,y)βˆ‰Ξ”(x, y) \notin \Delta, i.e., xβ‰ yx \neq y. Choose disjoint open Uβˆ‹xU \ni x, Vβˆ‹yV \ni y. Then UΓ—VU \times V is an open neighborhood of (x,y)(x, y) in XΓ—XX \times X, and (UΓ—V)βˆ©Ξ”=βˆ…(U \times V) \cap \Delta = \emptyset. So XΓ—Xβˆ–Ξ”X \times X \setminus \Delta is open.

(4): Let E={x:f(x)=g(x)}E = \{x : f(x) = g(x)\}. Then E=(f,g)βˆ’1(Ξ”)E = (f, g)^{-1}(\Delta) where (f,g):Xβ†’YΓ—Y(f, g): X \to Y \times Y is continuous. Since Ξ”\Delta is closed in YΓ—YY \times Y (by (2)), EE is closed. Since DβŠ†ED \subseteq E and DD is dense, E=XE = X.

β– 
RemarkThe Hierarchy So Far

T2β€…β€ŠβŸΉβ€…β€ŠT1β€…β€ŠβŸΉβ€…β€ŠT0T_2 \implies T_1 \implies T_0 Each implication is strict. The separation axioms continue with regularity (T3T_3) and normality (T4T_4), which involve separating points from closed sets and closed sets from each other.