TheoremComplete

Connected Subsets of the Real Line

The characterization of connected subsets of R\mathbb{R} as precisely the intervals is one of the most fundamental results in point-set topology. It connects the order structure, the completeness property, and the topology of the real line.


Main Theorem

Theorem4.13Connected Subsets of $\mathbb{R}$

A subset A⊆RA \subseteq \mathbb{R} is connected (in the standard topology) if and only if AA is an interval. Here "interval" includes:

  • ∅\emptyset, singletons {a}\{a\}, and R\mathbb{R},
  • bounded intervals (a,b)(a, b), [a,b][a, b], [a,b)[a, b), (a,b](a, b],
  • unbounded intervals (−∞,b)(-\infty, b), (−∞,b](-\infty, b], (a,∞)(a, \infty), [a,∞)[a, \infty).

Equivalently, AA is an interval if and only if for all a,b∈Aa, b \in A with a<ba < b, every cc with a<c<ba < c < b satisfies c∈Ac \in A.


Proof

Proof

(⇒\Rightarrow: Connected implies interval.) We prove the contrapositive. Suppose AA is not an interval. Then there exist a,b∈Aa, b \in A and c∉Ac \notin A with a<c<ba < c < b. Define: U=A∩(−∞,c),V=A∩(c,∞).U = A \cap (-\infty, c), \qquad V = A \cap (c, \infty).

Since c∉Ac \notin A, we have A=U∪VA = U \cup V. Both UU and VV are open in AA (they are intersections of AA with open sets in R\mathbb{R}). They are nonempty (a∈Ua \in U, b∈Vb \in V) and disjoint. So {U,V}\{U, V\} is a separation of AA, and AA is disconnected.

(⇐\Leftarrow: Interval implies connected.) Let II be an interval. Suppose for contradiction that I=U∪VI = U \cup V is a separation. Choose a∈Ua \in U and b∈Vb \in V; without loss of generality, a<ba < b.

Since II is an interval, [a,b]⊆I[a, b] \subseteq I. Define: s=sup⁡(U∩[a,b]).s = \sup(U \cap [a, b]).

This supremum exists since U∩[a,b]U \cap [a, b] is nonempty (contains aa) and bounded above by bb.

Claim: s∉Us \notin U.

Suppose s∈Us \in U. Since UU is open in II, there exists ϵ>0\epsilon > 0 with (s−ϵ,s+ϵ)∩I⊆U(s - \epsilon, s + \epsilon) \cap I \subseteq U. If s<bs < b, then for δ=min⁡(ϵ,b−s)/2\delta = \min(\epsilon, b - s) / 2, the point s+δ∈[a,b]s + \delta \in [a, b] and s+δ∈Us + \delta \in U, contradicting s=sup⁡(U∩[a,b])s = \sup(U \cap [a, b]). If s=bs = b, then b∈U∩V=∅b \in U \cap V = \emptyset, a contradiction. So s∉Us \notin U.

Claim: s∉Vs \notin V.

Since s∉Us \notin U, we must have s∈Vs \in V (as s∈[a,b]⊆I=U∪Vs \in [a, b] \subseteq I = U \cup V). Since VV is open in II, there exists ϵ>0\epsilon > 0 with (s−ϵ,s+ϵ)∩I⊆V(s - \epsilon, s + \epsilon) \cap I \subseteq V. In particular, (s−ϵ,s)∩I⊆V(s - \epsilon, s) \cap I \subseteq V, so (s−ϵ,s)∩U∩[a,b]=∅(s - \epsilon, s) \cap U \cap [a, b] = \emptyset. This means U∩[a,b]⊆[a,s−ϵ]U \cap [a, b] \subseteq [a, s - \epsilon], contradicting s=sup⁡(U∩[a,b])s = \sup(U \cap [a,b]) (since s>as > a and ϵ>0\epsilon > 0).

Since s∉Us \notin U and s∉Vs \notin V but s∈I=U∪Vs \in I = U \cup V, we have a contradiction. Therefore II is connected.

■

Consequences

Theorem4.14Continuous Functions on Intervals

Let f:I→Rf: I \to \mathbb{R} be continuous where II is an interval. Then f(I)f(I) is an interval.

Proof

II is connected (by Theorem 4.13). The continuous image of a connected space is connected. A connected subset of R\mathbb{R} is an interval (by Theorem 4.13).

■
ExampleNo Continuous Bijection $\mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R}^2$

There is no continuous bijection f:R→R2f: \mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R}^2. Indeed, removing a point pp from R\mathbb{R} disconnects it (giving two components), while removing f(p)f(p) from R2\mathbb{R}^2 leaves a connected space (R2∖{q}\mathbb{R}^2 \setminus \{q\} is path-connected for any qq). Since ff restricted to R∖{p}→R2∖{f(p)}\mathbb{R} \setminus \{p\} \to \mathbb{R}^2 \setminus \{f(p)\} is continuous and injective, the image would be a connected subset mapping bijectively from a disconnected domain -- this leads to a contradiction via more careful analysis.

More rigorously, this argument shows R≇R2\mathbb{R} \not\cong \mathbb{R}^2, and the general invariance of domain theorem shows Rm≇Rn\mathbb{R}^m \not\cong \mathbb{R}^n for m≠nm \neq n.


Extensions to Ordered Spaces

Theorem4.15Connected Ordered Spaces

A totally ordered set LL with the order topology is connected if and only if:

  1. LL has the least upper bound property: every nonempty subset bounded above has a supremum.
  2. LL is dense: for every a<ba < b in LL, there exists c∈Lc \in L with a<c<ba < c < b.
ExampleConnected and Disconnected Ordered Spaces
  • R\mathbb{R} satisfies both conditions: it is connected.
  • Q\mathbb{Q} is dense but lacks the LUB property: it is disconnected.
  • Z\mathbb{Z} has the LUB property (vacuously for bounded sets) but is not dense: it is disconnected (discrete).
  • The long line LL satisfies both conditions: it is connected.
  • [0,1]×[0,1][0, 1] \times [0, 1] in dictionary order satisfies both conditions: it is connected. The induced topology differs from the product topology (it is the "ordered square").
RemarkCharacterization of $\mathbb{R}$

Up to order isomorphism, R\mathbb{R} is the unique connected, separable, linearly ordered set without endpoints. This characterization uses the LUB property (for connectedness), a countable dense subset (for separability), and the existence of elements above and below any given element (no endpoints).