TheoremComplete

Closure Characterizations

The closure of a set can be described in several equivalent ways, each revealing a different aspect of the topological structure. These characterizations are used constantly throughout topology and analysis.


Main Theorem

Theorem1.3Characterizations of the Closure

Let (X,Ο„)(X, \tau) be a topological space and AβŠ†XA \subseteq X. The following are equivalent for a point x∈Xx \in X:

  1. x∈Aβ€Ύx \in \overline{A} (i.e., xx belongs to the closure of AA).
  2. Every open set UU containing xx satisfies U∩Aβ‰ βˆ…U \cap A \neq \emptyset.
  3. Every neighborhood NN of xx satisfies N∩Aβ‰ βˆ…N \cap A \neq \emptyset.
  4. x∈Ax \in A or xx is a limit point of AA (i.e., x∈AβˆͺAβ€²x \in A \cup A').

Moreover, the following characterizations hold for Aβ€Ύ\overline{A} as a set:

  1. Aβ€Ύ\overline{A} is the intersection of all closed sets containing AA.
  2. Aβ€Ύ=Xβˆ–int⁑(Xβˆ–A)\overline{A} = X \setminus \operatorname{int}(X \setminus A).

Proof

Proof

(1 ⇔\Leftrightarrow 5) This is the definition: Aβ€Ύ=β‹‚{C:CΒ closed,AβŠ†C}\overline{A} = \bigcap \{C : C \text{ closed}, A \subseteq C\}.

(1 β‡’\Rightarrow 2) Suppose x∈Aβ€Ύx \in \overline{A} and let UU be an open set containing xx. If U∩A=βˆ…U \cap A = \emptyset, then AβŠ†Xβˆ–UA \subseteq X \setminus U, and Xβˆ–UX \setminus U is closed. By (5), Aβ€ΎβŠ†Xβˆ–U\overline{A} \subseteq X \setminus U, so xβˆ‰Ux \notin U, a contradiction.

(2 β‡’\Rightarrow 1) Suppose every open set containing xx meets AA. Let CC be any closed set containing AA. If xβˆ‰Cx \notin C, then U=Xβˆ–CU = X \setminus C is an open set containing xx with U∩AβŠ†U∩C=βˆ…U \cap A \subseteq U \cap C = \emptyset, contradicting (2). So x∈Cx \in C for every closed CβŠ‡AC \supseteq A, giving x∈Aβ€Ύx \in \overline{A}.

(2 ⇔\Leftrightarrow 3) Immediate, since every open set containing xx is a neighborhood of xx, and every neighborhood of xx contains an open set containing xx.

(2 ⇔\Leftrightarrow 4) If x∈Ax \in A, then U∩Aβ‰ βˆ…U \cap A \neq \emptyset trivially. If xβˆ‰Ax \notin A but every open set UU containing xx satisfies U∩Aβ‰ βˆ…U \cap A \neq \emptyset, then (Uβˆ–{x})∩A=U∩Aβ‰ βˆ…(U \setminus \{x\}) \cap A = U \cap A \neq \emptyset (since xβˆ‰Ax \notin A), so xx is a limit point. Conversely, if x∈Ax \in A or x∈Aβ€²x \in A', then every open neighborhood of xx meets AA.

(1 ⇔\Leftrightarrow 6) We show Xβˆ–Aβ€Ύ=int⁑(Xβˆ–A)X \setminus \overline{A} = \operatorname{int}(X \setminus A). We have: xβˆ‰Aβ€Ύβ€…β€ŠβŸΊβ€…β€ŠβˆƒUβˆˆΟ„:x∈UΒ andΒ U∩A=βˆ…β€…β€ŠβŸΊβ€…β€ŠβˆƒUβˆˆΟ„:x∈UβŠ†Xβˆ–Aβ€…β€ŠβŸΊβ€…β€Šx∈int⁑(Xβˆ–A).x \notin \overline{A} \iff \exists U \in \tau : x \in U \text{ and } U \cap A = \emptyset \iff \exists U \in \tau : x \in U \subseteq X \setminus A \iff x \in \operatorname{int}(X \setminus A).

Taking complements: Aβ€Ύ=Xβˆ–int⁑(Xβˆ–A)\overline{A} = X \setminus \operatorname{int}(X \setminus A).

β– 

Derived Properties

Theorem1.4Properties of the Closure Operator

Let (X,Ο„)(X, \tau) be a topological space and A,BβŠ†XA, B \subseteq X. Then:

  1. βˆ…β€Ύ=βˆ…\overline{\emptyset} = \emptyset.
  2. AβŠ†Aβ€ΎA \subseteq \overline{A}.
  3. Aβ€Ύβ€Ύ=Aβ€Ύ\overline{\overline{A}} = \overline{A}.
  4. AβˆͺBβ€Ύ=Aβ€ΎβˆͺBβ€Ύ\overline{A \cup B} = \overline{A} \cup \overline{B}.
  5. If AβŠ†BA \subseteq B, then Aβ€ΎβŠ†Bβ€Ύ\overline{A} \subseteq \overline{B}.
  6. A∩Bβ€ΎβŠ†Aβ€Ύβˆ©Bβ€Ύ\overline{A \cap B} \subseteq \overline{A} \cap \overline{B} (equality need not hold in general).
  7. AA is closed if and only if A=Aβ€ΎA = \overline{A}.
  8. AA is dense in XX if and only if Aβ€Ύ=X\overline{A} = X.
Proof

We prove property (4) and (6), as the others follow directly from the definitions.

(4) Since AβŠ†AβˆͺBA \subseteq A \cup B and BβŠ†AβˆͺBB \subseteq A \cup B, property (5) gives Aβ€ΎβˆͺBβ€ΎβŠ†AβˆͺBβ€Ύ\overline{A} \cup \overline{B} \subseteq \overline{A \cup B}. For the reverse, Aβ€ΎβˆͺBβ€Ύ\overline{A} \cup \overline{B} is closed (finite union of closed sets) and contains AβˆͺBA \cup B, so by minimality AβˆͺBβ€ΎβŠ†Aβ€ΎβˆͺBβ€Ύ\overline{A \cup B} \subseteq \overline{A} \cup \overline{B}.

(6) Since A∩BβŠ†AA \cap B \subseteq A and A∩BβŠ†BA \cap B \subseteq B, we get A∩Bβ€ΎβŠ†Aβ€Ύ\overline{A \cap B} \subseteq \overline{A} and A∩Bβ€ΎβŠ†Bβ€Ύ\overline{A \cap B} \subseteq \overline{B}, hence A∩Bβ€ΎβŠ†Aβ€Ύβˆ©Bβ€Ύ\overline{A \cap B} \subseteq \overline{A} \cap \overline{B}.

For a counterexample to equality: in R\mathbb{R}, let A=(0,1)A = (0, 1) and B=(1,2)B = (1, 2). Then A∩B=βˆ…A \cap B = \emptyset, so A∩Bβ€Ύ=βˆ…\overline{A \cap B} = \emptyset, but Aβ€Ύβˆ©Bβ€Ύ=[0,1]∩[1,2]={1}\overline{A} \cap \overline{B} = [0, 1] \cap [1, 2] = \{1\}.

β– 

Closure in Subspaces

Theorem1.5Closure in Subspace Topology

Let YY be a subspace of XX and AβŠ†YA \subseteq Y. Then the closure of AA in YY is cl⁑Y(A)=Aβ€Ύβˆ©Y\operatorname{cl}_Y(A) = \overline{A} \cap Y, where Aβ€Ύ\overline{A} denotes the closure of AA in XX.

Proof

The closed sets in YY are exactly sets of the form C∩YC \cap Y where CC is closed in XX. Thus: cl⁑Y(A)=β‹‚{C∩Y:CΒ closedΒ inΒ X,AβŠ†C∩Y}=(β‹‚{C:CΒ closedΒ inΒ X,AβŠ†C})∩Y=Aβ€Ύβˆ©Y.\operatorname{cl}_Y(A) = \bigcap\{C \cap Y : C \text{ closed in } X, A \subseteq C \cap Y\} = \left(\bigcap\{C : C \text{ closed in } X, A \subseteq C\}\right) \cap Y = \overline{A} \cap Y.

β– 
ExampleClosure Depends on the Ambient Space

Let A={1/n:n∈Z+}A = \{1/n : n \in \mathbb{Z}^+\} and consider it as a subset of different spaces:

  • In R\mathbb{R}: Aβ€Ύ=Aβˆͺ{0}\overline{A} = A \cup \{0\}.
  • In (0,∞)(0, \infty): cl⁑(0,∞)(A)=Aβ€Ύβˆ©(0,∞)=A\operatorname{cl}_{(0,\infty)}(A) = \overline{A} \cap (0, \infty) = A (so AA is closed in (0,∞)(0, \infty)).
  • In (0,1](0, 1]: cl⁑(0,1](A)=A\operatorname{cl}_{(0,1]}(A) = A (closed in this subspace as well).

This illustrates that closure is relative to the ambient space.

RemarkDuality of Interior and Closure

The interior and closure operators are dual via complementation: int⁑(A)=Xβˆ–Xβˆ–Aβ€Ύ,Aβ€Ύ=Xβˆ–int⁑(Xβˆ–A).\operatorname{int}(A) = X \setminus \overline{X \setminus A}, \qquad \overline{A} = X \setminus \operatorname{int}(X \setminus A). This duality allows every statement about interiors to be translated into a statement about closures, and vice versa.