Closure Characterizations
The closure of a set can be described in several equivalent ways, each revealing a different aspect of the topological structure. These characterizations are used constantly throughout topology and analysis.
Main Theorem
Let be a topological space and . The following are equivalent for a point :
- (i.e., belongs to the closure of ).
- Every open set containing satisfies .
- Every neighborhood of satisfies .
- or is a limit point of (i.e., ).
Moreover, the following characterizations hold for as a set:
- is the intersection of all closed sets containing .
- .
Proof
(1 5) This is the definition: .
(1 2) Suppose and let be an open set containing . If , then , and is closed. By (5), , so , a contradiction.
(2 1) Suppose every open set containing meets . Let be any closed set containing . If , then is an open set containing with , contradicting (2). So for every closed , giving .
(2 3) Immediate, since every open set containing is a neighborhood of , and every neighborhood of contains an open set containing .
(2 4) If , then trivially. If but every open set containing satisfies , then (since ), so is a limit point. Conversely, if or , then every open neighborhood of meets .
(1 6) We show . We have:
Taking complements: .
Derived Properties
Let be a topological space and . Then:
- .
- .
- .
- .
- If , then .
- (equality need not hold in general).
- is closed if and only if .
- is dense in if and only if .
We prove property (4) and (6), as the others follow directly from the definitions.
(4) Since and , property (5) gives . For the reverse, is closed (finite union of closed sets) and contains , so by minimality .
(6) Since and , we get and , hence .
For a counterexample to equality: in , let and . Then , so , but .
Closure in Subspaces
Let be a subspace of and . Then the closure of in is , where denotes the closure of in .
The closed sets in are exactly sets of the form where is closed in . Thus:
Let and consider it as a subset of different spaces:
- In : .
- In : (so is closed in ).
- In : (closed in this subspace as well).
This illustrates that closure is relative to the ambient space.
The interior and closure operators are dual via complementation: This duality allows every statement about interiors to be translated into a statement about closures, and vice versa.