TheoremComplete

Gromov's Non-Squeezing Theorem

Theorem6.2Gromov Non-Squeezing

If there exists a symplectic embedding B2n(r)B2(R)×R2n2B^{2n}(r) \hookrightarrow B^2(R) \times \mathbb{R}^{2n-2} of the ball of radius rr in R2n\mathbb{R}^{2n} into the cylinder of radius RR, then rRr \leq R.

This theorem, proved by Gromov in 1985, demonstrates that symplectic geometry exhibits rigidity beyond volume preservation. While volume-preserving maps can squeeze a ball into an arbitrarily thin cylinder, symplectic maps cannot. This result launched the modern era of symplectic topology.

Proof

Gromov's proof uses pseudo-holomorphic curves. Suppose ϕ:B2n(r)B2(R)×R2n2\phi: B^{2n}(r) \hookrightarrow B^2(R) \times \mathbb{R}^{2n-2} is a symplectic embedding. Consider the compactification to S2(R)×T2n2S^2(R) \times T^{2n-2} and an almost complex structure JJ tamed by ω\omega agreeing with ϕ(J0)\phi_*(J_0) on ϕ(B(r))\phi(B(r)).

By Gromov's compactness theorem, there exists a JJ-holomorphic sphere u:S2S2(R)×T2n2u: S^2 \to S^2(R) \times T^{2n-2} through any point pϕ(B(r))p \in \phi(B(r)) representing the class [S2×{pt}][S^2 \times \{pt\}]. The area of uu is πR2\pi R^2 (by the homology class). But uu must pass through the image of the ball, and by the monotonicity lemma for holomorphic curves, the area within the ball is at least πr2\pi r^2. Thus πr2πR2\pi r^2 \leq \pi R^2, giving rRr \leq R. \square

RemarkSymplectic Capacities

The non-squeezing theorem motivates the definition of symplectic capacities: numerical invariants c(U)c(U) for open subsets of symplectic manifolds satisfying monotonicity, conformality, and a normalization. The Gromov width cG(U)=sup{πr2:B2n(r)U}c_G(U) = \sup\{\pi r^2 : B^{2n}(r) \hookrightarrow U\} is the prototypical example. Capacities provide obstructions to symplectic embeddings beyond volume.