Scott's Theorem: from Measurable Cardinals
Scott's theorem demonstrates that the existence of a measurable cardinal contradicts (Godel's axiom of constructibility), establishing a fundamental dichotomy in the foundations of set theory.
Statement
If there exists a measurable cardinal, then .
Proof
Suppose is measurable, witnessed by a -complete non-principal ultrafilter on . Form the ultrapower .
By Los's theorem, is an elementary embedding: .
Key properties of :
- for all (since for , the constant function represents in the ultrapower, and non-principality ensures no identification).
- (since the identity function represents an element in the ultrapower with for all ).
So is the critical point of : the least ordinal moved.
Assuming : Then as well (since by elementarity). In , is measurable, so "there exists a measurable cardinal." Let be the least measurable cardinal in .
Since is elementary and : " is the least measurable cardinal." But , so is the least measurable cardinal in . But we assumed is the least measurable cardinal, and . Contradiction.
Significance
Godel's constructible universe is the minimal inner model: and . Every set in is "definable from below." Scott's theorem shows that cannot accommodate measurable cardinals -- the universe must be "wider" than .
This has far-reaching consequences:
- implies there are no measurable cardinals (contrapositive of Scott).
- The existence of (a set of natural numbers coding an elementary embedding ) is equivalent to the failure of the covering lemma for .
Scott's argument generalizes: if is the least measurable cardinal and is the ultrapower embedding, then "thinks" is the least measurable. This means disagrees with about which cardinal is least measurable, so . This gap between and is measured by the Mitchell order and leads to the theory of core models.