ProofComplete

Proof of the PBW Theorem

We present the proof of the PoincarΓ©-Birkhoff-Witt theorem, which establishes the structure of the universal enveloping algebra.

TheoremPoincarΓ©-Birkhoff-Witt (PBW) Theorem

Let g\mathfrak{g} be a Lie algebra with ordered basis {X1,…,Xn}\{X_1, \ldots, X_n\}. Then the monomials: X1k1X2k2β‹―Xnkn,kiβ‰₯0X_1^{k_1} X_2^{k_2} \cdots X_n^{k_n}, \quad k_i \geq 0 form a basis for U(g)U(\mathfrak{g}) as a vector space.

ProofMain Proof

Step 1: Define filtrations

Introduce a filtration on U(g)U(\mathfrak{g}): U0βŠ†U1βŠ†U2βŠ†β‹―βŠ†U(g)U_0 \subseteq U_1 \subseteq U_2 \subseteq \cdots \subseteq U(\mathfrak{g}) where UkU_k is spanned by products of at most kk elements from g\mathfrak{g}.

Similarly, filter the symmetric algebra S(g)S(\mathfrak{g}) by degree: Sk=S_k = polynomials of degree ≀k\leq k.

Step 2: Construct the associated graded

The associated graded algebra is: gr(U(g))=⨁kβ‰₯0Uk/Ukβˆ’1\text{gr}(U(\mathfrak{g})) = \bigoplus_{k \geq 0} U_k / U_{k-1}

with multiplication induced from U(g)U(\mathfrak{g}). The canonical map gβ†’U(g)β†’gr(U(g))\mathfrak{g} \to U(\mathfrak{g}) \to \text{gr}(U(\mathfrak{g})) extends to a surjection: ψ:S(g)β† gr(U(g))\psi: S(\mathfrak{g}) \twoheadrightarrow \text{gr}(U(\mathfrak{g}))

Step 3: Show ψ\psi is injective

Consider the PBW monomials X1k1β‹―XnknX_1^{k_1} \cdots X_n^{k_n}. Their images in gr(U(g))\text{gr}(U(\mathfrak{g})) are: X1k1β‹―Xnknβ€ΎβˆˆUk1+β‹―+kn/Uk1+β‹―+knβˆ’1\overline{X_1^{k_1} \cdots X_n^{k_n}} \in U_{k_1 + \cdots + k_n} / U_{k_1 + \cdots + k_n - 1}

To show linear independence, suppose: βˆ‘(k1,…,kn)ck1,…,knX1k1β‹―Xnkn=0\sum_{(k_1, \ldots, k_n)} c_{k_1, \ldots, k_n} X_1^{k_1} \cdots X_n^{k_n} = 0 in U(g)U(\mathfrak{g}) with not all cc zero. Let d=max⁑{k1+β‹―+kn:ck1,…,knβ‰ 0}d = \max\{k_1 + \cdots + k_n : c_{k_1, \ldots, k_n} \neq 0\}.

Passing to gr(U(g))\text{gr}(U(\mathfrak{g})), the degree dd part gives: βˆ‘k1+β‹―+kn=dck1,…,knX1k1β‹―Xnknβ€Ύ=0\sum_{k_1 + \cdots + k_n = d} c_{k_1, \ldots, k_n} \overline{X_1^{k_1} \cdots X_n^{k_n}} = 0

Step 4: Use symmetry

In S(g)S(\mathfrak{g}), the monomials X1k1β‹―XnknX_1^{k_1} \cdots X_n^{k_n} are linearly independent (they form a basis for S(g)S(\mathfrak{g}) as a polynomial ring).

Since ψ:S(g)β†’gr(U(g))\psi: S(\mathfrak{g}) \to \text{gr}(U(\mathfrak{g})) is surjective and preserves the monomial structure, it must be injective (dimension count).

Therefore ψ\psi is an isomorphism: S(g)β‰…gr(U(g))S(\mathfrak{g}) \cong \text{gr}(U(\mathfrak{g})).

Step 5: Lift to U(g)U(\mathfrak{g})

Since gr(U(g))β‰…S(g)\text{gr}(U(\mathfrak{g})) \cong S(\mathfrak{g}) and both have the same Hilbert series (dimension in each degree), the PBW monomials in U(g)U(\mathfrak{g}) are linearly independent.

Moreover, they span U(g)U(\mathfrak{g}) by construction (every element can be written as a linear combination using the commutation relations).

Conclusion: The PBW monomials form a basis for U(g)U(\mathfrak{g}).

β– 
Remark

The PBW theorem is fundamental for:

  • Structure theory: U(g)U(\mathfrak{g}) is a filtered deformation of S(g)S(\mathfrak{g})
  • Quantization: Connection to Poisson geometry and deformation quantization
  • Homological algebra: Computing cohomology via Koszul resolution
  • Quantum groups: q-deformed versions Uq(g)U_q(\mathfrak{g}) satisfy q-PBW theorems

The theorem shows that the "non-commutativity" of U(g)U(\mathfrak{g}) is completely controlled by the Lie bracketβ€”there are no additional relations beyond the Lie algebra structure.

ExamplePBW for $\mathfrak{sl}_2$

For sl2\mathfrak{sl}_2 with basis {H,E,F}\{H, E, F\} and relations [H,E]=2E[H,E] = 2E, [H,F]=βˆ’2F[H,F] = -2F, [E,F]=H[E,F] = H:

A PBW basis is {HaEbFc:a,b,cβ‰₯0}\{H^a E^b F^c : a, b, c \geq 0\}.

Any element like EFEEFE can be rewritten: EFE=E(FE)=E(EFβˆ’H)=E2Fβˆ’EHEFE = E(FE) = E(EF - H) = E^2 F - EH =E2Fβˆ’(HEβˆ’2E)=E2Fβˆ’HE+2E= E^2 F - (HE - 2E) = E^2 F - HE + 2E expressing it in PBW form E2Fβˆ’HE+2EE^2 F - HE + 2E.