ConceptComplete

Properties of Induction

Induced representations satisfy important functorial properties and compatibility with various representation-theoretic operations.

TheoremTransitivity of Induction

Let KHGK \leq H \leq G be a tower of subgroups, and let WW be a representation of KK. Then: IndKG(W)IndHG(IndKH(W))\text{Ind}_K^G(W) \cong \text{Ind}_H^G(\text{Ind}_K^H(W))

Induction is transitive: we can induce in stages.

Proof idea: A function f:GWf: G \to W satisfying f(kg)=ρK(k)f(g)f(kg) = \rho_K(k)f(g) for kKk \in K is equivalent to a function F:GIndKH(W)F: G \to \text{Ind}_K^H(W) satisfying F(hg)(x)=ρH(h)(F(g)(x))F(hg)(x) = \rho_H(h)(F(g)(x)) for hHh \in H.

TheoremInduced Character Formula

For finite groups, if χW\chi_W is the character of WW (an HH-representation), the character of IndHG(W)\text{Ind}_H^G(W) is: χIndHG(W)(g)=1HxGxgx1HχW(xgx1)\chi_{\text{Ind}_H^G(W)}(g) = \frac{1}{|H|} \sum_{\substack{x \in G \\ xgx^{-1} \in H}} \chi_W(xgx^{-1})

Equivalently, using class functions on HH extended by zero: χIndHG(W)(g)=i=1n{χW(gi1ggi)if gi1ggiH0otherwise\chi_{\text{Ind}_H^G(W)}(g) = \sum_{i=1}^n \begin{cases} \chi_W(g_i^{-1}gg_i) & \text{if } g_i^{-1}gg_i \in H \\ 0 & \text{otherwise} \end{cases} where {g1,,gn}\{g_1, \ldots, g_n\} are coset representatives for HH in GG.

ExampleComputing Induced Characters

S3S_3 from S2S_2: Let H=(12)S3H = \langle (12) \rangle \subset S_3 with trivial representation. The coset representatives are {e,(13),(23)}\{e, (13), (23)\}. For g=(123)g = (123):

  • Check (123)(123) conjugated by each representative
  • Only e1(123)e=(123)He^{-1}(123)e = (123) \notin H contributes 0
  • Result: χInd((123))=0\chi_{\text{Ind}}((123)) = 0

For g=(12)g = (12):

  • e1(12)e=(12)He^{-1}(12)e = (12) \in H: contributes χtriv((12))=1\chi_{\text{triv}}((12)) = 1
  • (13)1(12)(13)=(23)H(13)^{-1}(12)(13) = (23) \notin H: contributes 0
  • Result: χInd((12))=1\chi_{\text{Ind}}((12)) = 1

The induced character is (3,1,0)(3, 1, 0), which is the permutation representation.

TheoremCompatibility with Direct Sums and Tensor Products
  1. Direct sums: IndHG(W1W2)IndHG(W1)IndHG(W2)\text{Ind}_H^G(W_1 \oplus W_2) \cong \text{Ind}_H^G(W_1) \oplus \text{Ind}_H^G(W_2)
  2. Tensor products: For VV a GG-representation and WW an HH-representation: ResHG(V)WResHG(VGIndHG(W))\text{Res}_H^G(V) \otimes W \cong \text{Res}_H^G(V \otimes_G \text{Ind}_H^G(W)) where G\otimes_G denotes a relative tensor product
Remark

These properties show that induction is a functor from Rep(H)\text{Rep}(H) to Rep(G)\text{Rep}(G), preserving the categorical structure. This functorial perspective is crucial in modern representation theory, leading to concepts like derived functors, Mackey theory, and categorical representation theory.

The induced character formula is computationally essential: it allows us to compute characters of induced representations without explicitly constructing the representation, using only character values on the subgroup.