ConceptComplete

Ordered Fields

Real analysis begins with the construction and axiomatization of the real number system. Before defining the real numbers, we introduce the algebraic structure of an ordered field, which captures the arithmetic and order properties that Q\mathbb{Q} and R\mathbb{R} share.


Definition and basic properties

Definition1.1Ordered field

An ordered field is a field FF equipped with a subset PFP \subseteq F (called the positive elements) satisfying:

  1. (Trichotomy) For all xFx \in F, exactly one of the following holds: xPx \in P, x=0x = 0, or xP-x \in P.
  2. (Closure under addition) If x,yPx, y \in P, then x+yPx + y \in P.
  3. (Closure under multiplication) If x,yPx, y \in P, then xyPxy \in P.

We write x>0x > 0 to mean xPx \in P, and x<yx < y to mean yxPy - x \in P.

RemarkTotal order

The relation << defined above is a total order on FF: it is transitive, antisymmetric, and satisfies trichotomy. Moreover, it is compatible with the field operations: if a<ba < b and cFc \in F, then a+c<b+ca + c < b + c; if c>0c > 0, then ac<bcac < bc.

ExampleThe rationals

The field Q\mathbb{Q} is an ordered field with P={xQx>0}P = \{x \in \mathbb{Q} \mid x > 0\}. The positive rationals are closed under addition and multiplication, and trichotomy holds by the usual ordering inherited from the integers.

ExampleC is not an ordered field

The field C\mathbb{C} of complex numbers cannot be made into an ordered field. Suppose there were such an order. Then either i>0i > 0 or i>0-i > 0 (by trichotomy). If i>0i > 0, then i2=1>0i^2 = -1 > 0, contradicting that 1<0-1 < 0. Similarly, i>0-i > 0 leads to a contradiction. Thus no total order compatible with the field operations exists on C\mathbb{C}.

ExampleFinite fields

Every ordered field has characteristic zero. Indeed, if FF has characteristic p>0p > 0, then 1+1++1=01 + 1 + \cdots + 1 = 0 (pp times), contradicting closure of PP under addition. In particular, no finite field can be ordered.


Absolute value and distance

Definition1.2Absolute value

For xx in an ordered field FF, the absolute value of xx is

x={xif x0,xif x<0.|x| = \begin{cases} x & \text{if } x \geq 0, \\ -x & \text{if } x < 0. \end{cases}

Theorem1.1Triangle inequality

For all x,yx, y in an ordered field FF:

x+yx+y.|x + y| \leq |x| + |y|.

RemarkReverse triangle inequality

A useful variant is xyxy||x| - |y|| \leq |x - y|, which follows from applying the triangle inequality to x=(xy)+yx = (x - y) + y and y=(yx)+xy = (y - x) + x.

ExampleBasic absolute value identities

For all x,yFx, y \in F:

  • x0|x| \geq 0, with equality iff x=0x = 0.
  • x=x|-x| = |x|.
  • xy=xy|xy| = |x| \cdot |y|.
  • x2=x2|x|^2 = x^2.
  • If x<ϵ|x| < \epsilon, then ϵ<x<ϵ-\epsilon < x < \epsilon.

These properties make xy|x - y| a natural candidate for a distance function (metric) on FF.


Archimedean and non-Archimedean fields

Definition1.3Archimedean property

An ordered field FF is Archimedean if for all x,yFx, y \in F with x>0x > 0, there exists nNn \in \mathbb{N} such that nx>ynx > y.

RemarkDensity of rationals in R

The Archimedean property is equivalent to saying: there are no "infinitely large" or "infinitely small" elements. In R\mathbb{R}, it implies that Q\mathbb{Q} is dense in R\mathbb{R}: between any two real numbers, there exists a rational.

ExampleQ is Archimedean

Given x,yQx, y \in \mathbb{Q} with x>0x > 0, choose nNn \in \mathbb{N} such that n>y/xn > y/x (such nn exists by the well-ordering of N\mathbb{N}). Then nx>ynx > y. Thus Q\mathbb{Q} is Archimedean.

ExampleNon-Archimedean fields

The field Q(t)\mathbb{Q}(t) of rational functions over Q\mathbb{Q}, ordered by declaring tt to be "infinitely large" (i.e., t>nt > n for all nNn \in \mathbb{N}), is a non-Archimedean ordered field. In this field, no multiple of 11 exceeds tt.

Similarly, the field of surreal numbers contains infinitesimals (elements ϵ>0\epsilon > 0 with ϵ<1/n\epsilon < 1/n for all nNn \in \mathbb{N}) and is non-Archimedean.

Theorem1.2Characterization of Archimedean fields

An ordered field FF is Archimedean if and only if Q\mathbb{Q} is dense in FF: for all x<yx < y in FF, there exists qQq \in \mathbb{Q} with x<q<yx < q < y.


Supremum and completeness

Not every ordered field has the completeness property that characterizes the real numbers.

Definition1.4Supremum (least upper bound)

Let SFS \subseteq F be a nonempty subset of an ordered field FF. An element bFb \in F is an upper bound of SS if xbx \leq b for all xSx \in S.

If SS has an upper bound, we say SS is bounded above. The supremum of SS, denoted supS\sup S, is the least upper bound: an element βF\beta \in F such that:

  1. β\beta is an upper bound of SS, and
  2. if α\alpha is any upper bound of SS, then βα\beta \leq \alpha.

If supS\sup S exists, it is unique.

Definition1.5Complete ordered field

An ordered field FF is complete (or has the least upper bound property) if every nonempty subset SFS \subseteq F that is bounded above has a supremum in FF.

ExampleQ is not complete

Let S={xQx2<2}S = \{x \in \mathbb{Q} \mid x^2 < 2\}. Then SS is nonempty and bounded above in Q\mathbb{Q} (e.g., 22 is an upper bound), but SS has no supremum in Q\mathbb{Q}. The "least upper bound" would have to satisfy α2=2\alpha^2 = 2, but 2Q\sqrt{2} \notin \mathbb{Q}. Thus Q\mathbb{Q} is incomplete.

RemarkCharacterization of the reals

The real numbers R\mathbb{R} are the unique complete ordered field (up to isomorphism). The completeness axiom — every nonempty bounded-above set has a supremum — is what distinguishes R\mathbb{R} from Q\mathbb{Q} and is the foundation for limits, continuity, and the entire theory of real analysis.


Summary

Ordered fields provide the algebraic and order-theoretic framework for real analysis:

  • Q\mathbb{Q} is an Archimedean ordered field, but not complete.
  • R\mathbb{R} is the complete Archimedean ordered field.
  • Completeness ensures that Cauchy sequences converge, continuous functions on [a,b][a,b] attain their maximum, and bounded monotone sequences converge.

The next concepts will develop the construction of R\mathbb{R} via Dedekind cuts or Cauchy sequences, and establish the completeness axiom rigorously.