ProofComplete

Common Distributions - Key Proof

We prove that the sum of independent normal random variables is normal—a fundamental result with far-reaching consequences.

Normality of Sums

Theorem

If X∼N(μ1,σ12)X \sim \mathcal{N}(\mu_1, \sigma_1^2) and Y∼N(μ2,σ22)Y \sim \mathcal{N}(\mu_2, \sigma_2^2) are independent, then: X+Y∼N(μ1+μ2,σ12+σ22)X + Y \sim \mathcal{N}(\mu_1 + \mu_2, \sigma_1^2 + \sigma_2^2)

Proof

We prove using moment generating functions.

Step 1: Recall the MGF of X∼N(μ,σ2)X \sim \mathcal{N}(\mu, \sigma^2): MX(t)=E[etX]=eμt+σ2t2/2M_X(t) = E[e^{tX}] = e^{\mu t + \sigma^2 t^2/2}

Step 2: For independent XX and YY: MX+Y(t)=E[et(X+Y)]=E[etX]E[etY]=MX(t)MY(t)M_{X+Y}(t) = E[e^{t(X+Y)}] = E[e^{tX}]E[e^{tY}] = M_X(t) M_Y(t)

by independence.

Step 3: Substituting the normal MGFs: MX+Y(t)=eμ1t+σ12t2/2⋅eμ2t+σ22t2/2M_{X+Y}(t) = e^{\mu_1 t + \sigma_1^2 t^2/2} \cdot e^{\mu_2 t + \sigma_2^2 t^2/2}

=e(μ1+μ2)t+(σ12+σ22)t2/2= e^{(\mu_1 + \mu_2)t + (\sigma_1^2 + \sigma_2^2)t^2/2}

Step 4: This is the MGF of N(μ1+μ2,σ12+σ22)\mathcal{N}(\mu_1 + \mu_2, \sigma_1^2 + \sigma_2^2).

Since MGFs uniquely determine distributions, we conclude: X+Y∼N(μ1+μ2,σ12+σ22)X + Y \sim \mathcal{N}(\mu_1 + \mu_2, \sigma_1^2 + \sigma_2^2) □

■

Generalization

Theorem

If X1,…,XnX_1, \ldots, X_n are independent with Xi∼N(μi,σi2)X_i \sim \mathcal{N}(\mu_i, \sigma_i^2), and a1,…,ana_1, \ldots, a_n are constants, then: ∑i=1naiXi∼N(∑i=1naiμi,∑i=1nai2σi2)\sum_{i=1}^n a_i X_i \sim \mathcal{N}\left(\sum_{i=1}^n a_i \mu_i, \sum_{i=1}^n a_i^2 \sigma_i^2\right)

Proof Outline: First show aX∼N(aμ,a2σ2)aX \sim \mathcal{N}(a\mu, a^2\sigma^2) using MGFs: MaX(t)=E[etaX]=MX(at)=eμ(at)+σ2(at)2/2=e(aμ)t+(a2σ2)t2/2M_{aX}(t) = E[e^{taX}] = M_X(at) = e^{\mu(at) + \sigma^2(at)^2/2} = e^{(a\mu)t + (a^2\sigma^2)t^2/2}

Then apply the sum result iteratively. □

Example

Portfolio Returns: Consider a portfolio with weights w1=0.6,w2=0.4w_1 = 0.6, w_2 = 0.4 in two stocks.

Stock 1: annual return R1∼N(0.08,0.042)R_1 \sim \mathcal{N}(0.08, 0.04^2) (8% mean, 4% std dev)

Stock 2: annual return R2∼N(0.12,0.062)R_2 \sim \mathcal{N}(0.12, 0.06^2) (12% mean, 6% std dev)

Assuming independence, portfolio return: Rp=0.6R1+0.4R2∼N(μp,σp2)R_p = 0.6R_1 + 0.4R_2 \sim \mathcal{N}(\mu_p, \sigma_p^2)

where: μp=0.6(0.08)+0.4(0.12)=0.096=9.6%\mu_p = 0.6(0.08) + 0.4(0.12) = 0.096 = 9.6\% σp2=(0.6)2(0.04)2+(0.4)2(0.06)2=0.000576+0.000576=0.001152\sigma_p^2 = (0.6)^2(0.04)^2 + (0.4)^2(0.06)^2 = 0.000576 + 0.000576 = 0.001152 σp=0.001152≈0.0339=3.39%\sigma_p = \sqrt{0.001152} \approx 0.0339 = 3.39\%

Alternative Proof via Convolution

The PDF of Z=X+YZ = X + Y is the convolution: fZ(z)=∫−∞∞fX(x)fY(z−x) dxf_Z(z) = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} f_X(x) f_Y(z-x) \, dx

For normal densities, this integral evaluates to another normal density (tedious calculation involving completing the square in the exponent).

Remark

The closure of the normal distribution under linear combinations is unique among continuous distributions. This property, combined with the CLT, makes the normal distribution central to probability and statistics. The MGF proof is elegant and generalizes easily to nn variables.