ProofComplete

Signed Measures and Radon-Nikodym - Key Proof

ProofProof Sketch of the Hahn Decomposition Theorem

We outline the proof of the Hahn Decomposition Theorem for a signed measure ν\nu.

Goal: Find disjoint sets P,NP, N with P∪N=XP \cup N = X such that ν\nu is non-negative on subsets of PP and non-positive on subsets of NN.

Proof (assuming ν\nu takes no value −∞-\infty):

Step 1: Define: α=sup⁡{ν(A):A∈F}\alpha = \sup\{\nu(A) : A \in \mathcal{F}\}

Since ν\nu takes no value −∞-\infty, we have α∈[0,∞]\alpha \in [0, \infty].

Step 2: Choose a sequence {An}\{A_n\} in F\mathcal{F} with ν(An)→α\nu(A_n) \to \alpha. Define: P=⋃n=1∞AnP = \bigcup_{n=1}^{\infty} A_n

Step 3: We claim PP is a positive set. Suppose not: there exists E⊆PE \subseteq P with ν(E)<0\nu(E) < 0.

Then for large nn, considering An∪EA_n \cup E: ν(An∪E)=ν(An)+ν(E∖An)≥ν(An)+ν(E)\nu(A_n \cup E) = \nu(A_n) + \nu(E \setminus A_n) \geq \nu(A_n) + \nu(E)

If ν(E∖An)≥0\nu(E \setminus A_n) \geq 0, this gives ν(An∪E)≥ν(An)+ν(E)>ν(An)\nu(A_n \cup E) \geq \nu(A_n) + \nu(E) > \nu(A_n), contradicting α=sup⁡ν(A)\alpha = \sup \nu(A) as n→∞n \to \infty.

Step 4: More carefully, one shows that PP can be chosen so that for any E⊆PE \subseteq P, we have ν(E)≥0\nu(E) \geq 0. This requires an iterative construction that removes negative subsets.

Step 5: Set N=PcN = P^c. We must show ν(E)≤0\nu(E) \leq 0 for all E⊆NE \subseteq N.

If ν(E)>0\nu(E) > 0 for some E⊆NE \subseteq N, then P∪EP \cup E would give ν(P∪E)>ν(P)=α\nu(P \cup E) > \nu(P) = \alpha, contradicting the definition of α\alpha.

Step 6: Thus (P,N)(P, N) is a Hahn decomposition.

■
Remark

Key insights in the proof:

  1. Supremum argument: The proof uses the supremum of ν\nu over all measurable sets to construct PP. This is a variational approach.

  2. Countable unions: Taking P=⋃AnP = \bigcup A_n ensures PP "captures" the supremum in the limit, using countable additivity of ν\nu.

  3. Iterative refinement: The actual proof requires iteratively removing bad subsets from candidates for PP until a true positive set is achieved.

  4. Non-uniqueness: The decomposition is not unique. If (P,N)(P, N) is a Hahn decomposition and EE is a null set (with ν+(E)=ν−(E)=0\nu^+(E) = \nu^-(E) = 0), then (P∪E,N∖E)(P \cup E, N \setminus E) is also a Hahn decomposition.

  5. Jordan decomposition: Once the Hahn decomposition is established, the Jordan decomposition ν=ν+−ν−\nu = \nu^+ - \nu^- follows immediately by defining ν+(A)=ν(A∩P)\nu^+(A) = \nu(A \cap P) and ν−(A)=−ν(A∩N)\nu^-(A) = -\nu(A \cap N).