Cohen's Independence of the Continuum Hypothesis
Cohen proved in 1963 that the Continuum Hypothesis () is independent of ZFC: it can neither be proved nor disproved from the standard axioms. Combined with Gödel's earlier consistency result, this completely resolves the status of CH relative to ZFC.
Statement
The Continuum Hypothesis is independent of ZFC:
- (Gödel, 1940) If ZFC is consistent, then ZFC + CH is consistent. (Proved via .)
- (Cohen, 1963) If ZFC is consistent, then ZFC + CH is consistent. (Proved via forcing.)
We sketch Cohen's forcing argument for (2). Start with a countable transitive model . Use the forcing notion : finite partial functions from to , ordered by reverse inclusion.
A generic filter determines many new subsets of (one for each ). Key properties:
- is c.c.c. (by a -system argument), so preserves all cardinals.
- New reals are distinct: For , the generically added functions differ.
- No new cardinals collapsed: Since is c.c.c., and .
Therefore in : , so CH fails.
Cohen's method extends dramatically: Easton showed that the function on regular cardinals can be essentially arbitrary (subject to König's theorem: ). However, the behavior of for singular is much more constrained (Shelah's pcf theory).
By varying the forcing notion, one can construct models where equals , , , , or any regular cardinal satisfying König's constraint. This demonstrates the enormous flexibility of ZFC: it leaves the size of the continuum almost completely undetermined.