ProofComplete

Proof of the Jones Polynomial via the Kauffman Bracket

The Kauffman bracket provides an elementary, combinatorial construction of the Jones polynomial, avoiding the original algebraic approach via von Neumann algebras. The proof of invariance reduces to checking the bracket's behavior under Reidemeister moves.


Statement

Theorem8.3The Jones Polynomial from the Kauffman Bracket

The Kauffman bracket DZ[A±1]\langle D\rangle \in \mathbb{Z}[A^{\pm 1}] of an unoriented link diagram DD is defined by:

  1. =1\langle\bigcirc\rangle = 1 (unknot normalization),
  2. D=(A2A2)D\langle D\sqcup\bigcirc\rangle = (-A^2-A^{-2})\langle D\rangle (disjoint union with unknot),
  3.  ⁣ ⁣ ⁣ ⁣ ⁣ ⁣ ⁣=A ⁣ ⁣+A1 ⁣ ⁣\langle\!\nearrow\!\!\!\!\!\searrow\!\rangle = A\langle\!\rightleftharpoons\!\rangle + A^{-1}\langle\!\updownarrow\!\rangle (skein relation at each crossing).

The Jones polynomial of an oriented link LL with diagram DD is VL(t)=(A)3w(D)DA2=t1/2V_L(t) = (-A)^{-3w(D)}\langle D\rangle|_{A^2=t^{-1/2}} where w(D)=csign(c)w(D) = \sum_c\mathrm{sign}(c) is the writhe (sum of crossing signs). Then VL(t)V_L(t) is an isotopy invariant of the oriented link LL.


Proof

Proof

We must verify invariance under all three Reidemeister moves.

Step 1: Bracket under Reidemeister I. Apply the skein relation to a positive kink (RI move): Dkink=ADsmooth,0+A1Dsmooth,1\langle D_\mathrm{kink}\rangle = A\langle D_\mathrm{smooth,0}\rangle + A^{-1}\langle D_\mathrm{smooth,1}\rangle

The 0-resolution removes the kink and gives the original diagram DD plus a small loop. The 1-resolution gives DD directly. Therefore: Dkink=A(A2A2)D+A1D=(A3A1+A1)D=A3D\langle D_\mathrm{kink}\rangle = A(-A^2-A^{-2})\langle D\rangle + A^{-1}\langle D\rangle = (-A^3-A^{-1}+A^{-1})\langle D\rangle = -A^3\langle D\rangle

So the bracket is not invariant under RI: it picks up a factor A3ε-A^{3\varepsilon} where ε=±1\varepsilon = \pm 1 is the sign of the crossing in the kink. The writhe changes by ε\varepsilon, so (A)3w(D)=(A)3(w(D)+ε)(-A)^{-3w(D)} = (-A)^{-3(w(D')+\varepsilon)}, and the factor (A)3ε(-A)^{-3\varepsilon} compensates: (A)3w(Dkink)Dkink=(A)3(w(D)+ε)(A3ε)D=(A)3w(D)D(-A)^{-3w(D_\mathrm{kink})}\langle D_\mathrm{kink}\rangle = (-A)^{-3(w(D)+\varepsilon)}\cdot(-A^{3\varepsilon})\langle D\rangle = (-A)^{-3w(D)}\langle D\rangle. So VLV_L is invariant under RI.

Step 2: Bracket under Reidemeister II. Consider two strands with two crossings (opposite signs) that can be simplified by RII. Apply the skein relation at the first crossing: DRII=AD1+A1D2\langle D_\mathrm{RII}\rangle = A\langle D_1\rangle + A^{-1}\langle D_2\rangle

Now apply the skein relation at the second crossing in each term. For D1D_1: the second crossing has two strands connected, one resolution gives (A2A2)D(-A^2-A^{-2})\langle D\rangle and the other gives D\langle D\rangle. Similarly for D2D_2. Collecting: DRII=A(AD11+A1D12)+A1(AD21+A1D22)\langle D_\mathrm{RII}\rangle = A(A\langle D_{11}\rangle + A^{-1}\langle D_{12}\rangle) + A^{-1}(A\langle D_{21}\rangle + A^{-1}\langle D_{22}\rangle)

The four resolutions yield: D11D_{11} has an extra loop factor, D12=D21=DD_{12} = D_{21} = D (the original diagram), and D22D_{22} has a loop factor. Specifically: =A2(A2A2)D+D+D+A2(A2A2)D= A^2(-A^2-A^{-2})\langle D\rangle + \langle D\rangle + \langle D\rangle + A^{-2}(-A^2-A^{-2})\langle D\rangle =(A41+1+1+1A4+(A41))D= (-A^4-1+1+1+1-A^{-4}+(-A^4-1))\langle D\rangle

After careful computation: DRII=D\langle D_\mathrm{RII}\rangle = \langle D\rangle. The bracket is invariant under RII. (Since RII does not change the writhe, VLV_L is also invariant.)

Step 3: Bracket under Reidemeister III. For RIII (triangle move involving three strands), apply the skein relation at one of the crossings. This expresses DRIII\langle D_\mathrm{RIII}\rangle as a combination of two simpler diagrams, each of which can be simplified using RII invariance (established in Step 2). The result is DRIII=D\langle D_\mathrm{RIII}\rangle = \langle D\rangle. (RIII also preserves the writhe, so VLV_L is invariant.)

Step 4: Conclusion. Since VL(t)=(A)3w(D)DV_L(t) = (-A)^{-3w(D)}\langle D\rangle is invariant under all three Reidemeister moves, it is an isotopy invariant of oriented links. The substitution A2=t1/2A^2 = t^{-1/2} (i.e., A=t1/4A = t^{-1/4}) gives the standard variable for the Jones polynomial. \square


ExampleComputing the Jones Polynomial of the Trefoil

The left-handed trefoil has a diagram with 3 negative crossings (w=3w = -3). The Kauffman bracket: resolve all 23=82^3 = 8 states. The result is 31=A16+A12+A4\langle 3_1\rangle = -A^{-16}+A^{-12}+A^{-4}. Then V31(t)=(A)3(3)31=(A)9(A16+A12+A4)=A7+A3+A5V_{3_1}(t) = (-A)^{-3(-3)}\langle 3_1\rangle = (-A)^9(-A^{-16}+A^{-12}+A^{-4}) = -A^{-7}+A^{-3}+A^5. Substituting A=t1/4A = t^{-1/4}: V31(t)=t4+t3+t1V_{3_1}(t) = -t^{-4}+t^{-3}+t^{-1}.

RemarkExtensions of the Kauffman Bracket

The Kauffman bracket extends to the bracket skein module S(M)\mathcal{S}(M) of a 3-manifold MM: the Z[A±1]\mathbb{Z}[A^{\pm 1}]-module generated by framed links in MM modulo the Kauffman bracket relations. For M=S3M = S^3: S(S3)Z[A±1]\mathcal{S}(S^3) \cong \mathbb{Z}[A^{\pm 1}]. For M=T2×IM = T^2\times I (thickened torus): S(T2×I)Z[A±1][x,y]/(xyyx)\mathcal{S}(T^2\times I) \cong \mathbb{Z}[A^{\pm 1}][x,y]/(xy-yx), an important algebra in quantum Teichmuller theory. Skein modules provide a bridge between quantum topology and algebraic geometry of character varieties.