Weak and Weak* Topologies - Examples and Constructions
Reflexivity provides a deep connection between weak and weak* topologies, characterizing when a Banach space can be identified with its bidual.
A Banach space is reflexive if and only if the closed unit ball is weakly compact.
This provides a topological characterization of reflexivity. The weakly compact spaces are exactly those where bounded sets have good compactness properties.
Forward: If is reflexive, then is surjective. The unit ball maps onto , which is weak* compact by Banach-Alaoglu. Since is a homeomorphism for the weak and weak* topologies, is weakly compact.
Reverse: If is weakly compact, we show . For any , by Goldstine's theorem, there exists a net in with weak*. If is weakly compact, we can extract a subnet converging weakly (hence weak*) to some . Thus .
- Hilbert Spaces: All Hilbert spaces are reflexive
- Spaces: For , is reflexive
- Sobolev Spaces: for is reflexive
- Non-Reflexive: , , , , , are not reflexive
Let be a Banach space and . Then is relatively weakly compact if and only if:
- is bounded
- For every , there exists a finite-dimensional subspace such that for every ,
A sequence in a Banach space is a Schauder basis if every has a unique representation with convergence in norm.
If has a Schauder basis, then is separable.
In non-reflexive spaces, weak* convergence is genuinely weaker than weak convergence.
Consider with dual . The sequence in defined by (standard basis) converges weak* to (since for all ), but does not converge weakly in (the dual of is , and there exist bounded sequences where doesn't converge).
Reflexive spaces are particularly well-behaved for analysis because weak compactness, sequential weak compactness, and weak* compactness all coincide. In non-reflexive spaces, these concepts diverge, requiring more careful analysis.
Understanding reflexivity and weak compactness is essential for applying functional analytic methods to variational problems and PDEs.