ConceptComplete

Weak and Weak* Topologies - Examples and Constructions

Reflexivity provides a deep connection between weak and weak* topologies, characterizing when a Banach space can be identified with its bidual.

TheoremCharacterization of Reflexivity

A Banach space XX is reflexive if and only if the closed unit ball is weakly compact.

This provides a topological characterization of reflexivity. The weakly compact spaces are exactly those where bounded sets have good compactness properties.

Proof

Forward: If XX is reflexive, then J:XXJ : X \to X^{**} is surjective. The unit ball BXB_X maps onto BXB_{X^{**}}, which is weak* compact by Banach-Alaoglu. Since JJ is a homeomorphism for the weak and weak* topologies, BXB_X is weakly compact.

Reverse: If BXB_X is weakly compact, we show X=J(X)X^{**} = J(X). For any xBXx^{**} \in B_{X^{**}}, by Goldstine's theorem, there exists a net (xα)(x_\alpha) in BXB_X with J(xα)xJ(x_\alpha) \to x^{**} weak*. If BXB_X is weakly compact, we can extract a subnet converging weakly (hence weak*) to some xBXx \in B_X. Thus x=J(x)x^{**} = J(x).

ExampleReflexive Spaces
  1. Hilbert Spaces: All Hilbert spaces are reflexive
  2. LpL^p Spaces: For 1<p<1 < p < \infty, Lp(μ)L^p(\mu) is reflexive
  3. Sobolev Spaces: Wk,p(Ω)W^{k,p}(\Omega) for 1<p<1 < p < \infty is reflexive
  4. Non-Reflexive: L1L^1, LL^\infty, C[0,1]C[0,1], 1\ell^1, \ell^\infty, c0c_0 are not reflexive
TheoremWeak Compactness Criterion

Let XX be a Banach space and KXK \subset X. Then KK is relatively weakly compact if and only if:

  1. KK is bounded
  2. For every ε>0\varepsilon > 0, there exists a finite-dimensional subspace FXF \subset X such that for every xKx \in K, dist(x,F)<ε\text{dist}(x, F) < \varepsilon
DefinitionSchauder Basis

A sequence (en)(e_n) in a Banach space XX is a Schauder basis if every xXx \in X has a unique representation x=n=1αnenx = \sum_{n=1}^\infty \alpha_n e_n with convergence in norm.

If XX has a Schauder basis, then XX is separable.

ExampleWeak* vs Weak Convergence

In non-reflexive spaces, weak* convergence is genuinely weaker than weak convergence.

Consider X=c0X = c_0 with dual X=1X^* = \ell^1. The sequence (ϕn)(\phi_n) in 1\ell^1 defined by ϕn=en\phi_n = e_n (standard basis) converges weak* to 00 (since ϕn(x)=xn0\phi_n(x) = x_n \to 0 for all xc0x \in c_0), but does not converge weakly in 1\ell^1 (the dual of 1\ell^1 is \ell^\infty, and there exist bounded sequences where nxn\sum_n x_n doesn't converge).

Remark

Reflexive spaces are particularly well-behaved for analysis because weak compactness, sequential weak compactness, and weak* compactness all coincide. In non-reflexive spaces, these concepts diverge, requiring more careful analysis.

Understanding reflexivity and weak compactness is essential for applying functional analytic methods to variational problems and PDEs.