ProofComplete

Proof of the Hodge Decomposition via Elliptic Theory

The Hodge decomposition rests on the theory of elliptic operators on compact manifolds. We present the key analytical ingredients and show how they combine to yield the decomposition.


Elliptic Operators on Compact Manifolds

Definition10.7Elliptic operator

A linear differential operator P:Γ(E)→Γ(F)P: \Gamma(E) \to \Gamma(F) of order mm between vector bundles is elliptic if its principal symbol σm(P)(x,ξ):Ex→Fx\sigma_m(P)(x, \xi): E_x \to F_x is an isomorphism for all x∈Mx \in M and ξ∈Tx∗M∖{0}\xi \in T^*_xM \setminus \{0\}.

The Hodge Laplacian Δ=dδ+δd\Delta = d\delta + \delta d has principal symbol σ2(Δ)(x,ξ)=∣ξ∣2Id\sigma_2(\Delta)(x, \xi) = |\xi|^2 \mathrm{Id}, which is positive definite for ξ≠0\xi \neq 0. Hence Δ\Delta is elliptic.


Key Analytical Results

Theorem10.9Elliptic regularity

If PP is an elliptic operator of order mm on a compact manifold and Pu=fPu = f with f∈Hsf \in H^s (Sobolev space), then u∈Hs+mu \in H^{s+m}. In particular, if f∈C∞f \in C^\infty, then u∈C∞u \in C^\infty. Applied to Δ\Delta: any distributional solution of Δω=f\Delta\omega = f with ff smooth is itself smooth.

Theorem10.10Fredholm property

An elliptic operator P:Hs+m(E)→Hs(F)P: H^{s+m}(E) \to H^s(F) on a compact manifold is Fredholm: it has finite-dimensional kernel, closed range, and finite-dimensional cokernel. The index ind(P)=dim⁡ker⁡P−dim⁡coker P\mathrm{ind}(P) = \dim\ker P - \dim\mathrm{coker}\, P is a topological invariant.


The Hodge Decomposition Proof

Proof

We prove the decomposition Ωk=Hk⊕dΩk−1⊕δΩk+1\Omega^k = \mathcal{H}^k \oplus d\Omega^{k-1} \oplus \delta\Omega^{k+1} in detail.

Step 1: The orthogonal complement of ker⁡Δ\ker\Delta. Since Δ\Delta is self-adjoint and elliptic on a compact manifold:

  • ker⁡Δ\ker\Delta is finite-dimensional (by the Fredholm property).
  • L2Ωk=ker⁡Δ⊕im(Δ)‾L^2\Omega^k = \ker\Delta \oplus \overline{\mathrm{im}(\Delta)} (since Δ\Delta is self-adjoint, (ker⁡Δ)⊥=im(Δ)‾(\ker\Delta)^\perp = \overline{\mathrm{im}(\Delta)}).
  • The image is closed (Fredholm property), so im(Δ)‾=im(Δ)\overline{\mathrm{im}(\Delta)} = \mathrm{im}(\Delta).

Thus L2Ωk=ker⁡Δ⊕im(Δ)L^2\Omega^k = \ker\Delta \oplus \mathrm{im}(\Delta), and by elliptic regularity (smooth inputs give smooth outputs), this holds at the smooth level: Ωk=Hk⊕ΔΩk\Omega^k = \mathcal{H}^k \oplus \Delta\Omega^k.

Step 2: Splitting im(Δ)\mathrm{im}(\Delta). We claim ΔΩk=dΩk−1⊕δΩk+1\Delta\Omega^k = d\Omega^{k-1} \oplus \delta\Omega^{k+1} (orthogonal).

Orthogonality: ⟨dα,δβ⟩=⟨d2α,β⟩=0\langle d\alpha, \delta\beta \rangle = \langle d^2\alpha, \beta \rangle = 0 since d2=0d^2 = 0.

Inclusion ⊃\supset: dα=d(δd+dδ)Gα′d\alpha = d(\delta d + d\delta)G\alpha' (using the Green's operator), and similarly for δ\delta. In fact, for ω⊥Hk\omega \perp \mathcal{H}^k, we have ω=ΔGω=dδGω+δdGω\omega = \Delta G\omega = d\delta G\omega + \delta d G\omega, where dδGω∈dΩk−1d\delta G\omega \in d\Omega^{k-1} and δdGω∈δΩk+1\delta d G\omega \in \delta\Omega^{k+1}.

Inclusion ⊂\subset: Δω=(dδ+δd)ω=d(δω)+δ(dω)∈dΩk−1+δΩk+1\Delta\omega = (d\delta + \delta d)\omega = d(\delta\omega) + \delta(d\omega) \in d\Omega^{k-1} + \delta\Omega^{k+1}.

Step 3: Assembling the decomposition. From Steps 1 and 2:

Ωk=Hk⊕dΩk−1⊕δΩk+1,\Omega^k = \mathcal{H}^k \oplus d\Omega^{k-1} \oplus \delta\Omega^{k+1},

with pairwise orthogonality. Every ω∈Ωk\omega \in \Omega^k decomposes uniquely as ω=Hω+dα+δβ\omega = H\omega + d\alpha + \delta\beta, where HH is the harmonic projection, α=δGω\alpha = \delta G\omega, and β=dGω\beta = dG\omega. ■\blacksquare

■

Remarks

RemarkThe Green's operator

The Green's operator G:Ωk→ΩkG: \Omega^k \to \Omega^k is defined by G∣Hk=0G|_{\mathcal{H}^k} = 0 and G=Δ−1G = \Delta^{-1} on (Hk)⊥(\mathcal{H}^k)^\perp. It satisfies ΔG+H=Id=GΔ+H\Delta G + H = \mathrm{Id} = G\Delta + H, where HH is the harmonic projection. The Green's operator is a compact, self-adjoint operator on L2ΩkL^2\Omega^k that smoothes by two derivatives.

RemarkManifolds with boundary

For manifolds with boundary, the Hodge decomposition requires boundary conditions. The two natural choices are absolute boundary conditions (ινω∣∂M=0\iota_\nu \omega|_{\partial M} = 0 and ινdω∣∂M=0\iota_\nu d\omega|_{\partial M} = 0) and relative boundary conditions (ω∣∂M=0\omega|_{\partial M} = 0 and δω∣∂M=0\delta\omega|_{\partial M} = 0). Each gives a Hodge decomposition, with the harmonic forms corresponding to absolute (resp. relative) cohomology.