Proof of the Argument Principle
The argument principle connects the contour integral of the logarithmic derivative to the number of zeros and poles of enclosed by the contour.
Statement
Let be meromorphic inside and on a simple closed positively oriented contour , with no zeros or poles on . Then
where is the total number of zeros and the total number of poles of inside , each counted with multiplicity.
Proof
Step 1: Local analysis near a zero.
If has a zero of order at , write with and holomorphic. Then
The term is holomorphic near , so .
Step 2: Local analysis near a pole.
If has a pole of order at , write with . Then
So .
Step 3: Apply the residue theorem.
The function is holomorphic inside except at the zeros and poles of . By the residue theorem:
Geometric Interpretation
The integral equals the winding number of the curve around the origin. As traverses once, changes by .
This can be visualized: draw the image curve as traces . Count how many times this curve winds around ; the answer is .
Applications
How many solutions does have in ?
Set . On : and . By Rouche with dominating : the number of zeros of in equals the number of zeros of , which is .
In control theory, the Nyquist stability criterion is a direct application of the argument principle. For a feedback system with open-loop transfer function , the closed-loop system is stable if and only if the Nyquist plot of (the image of the imaginary axis under ) winds around exactly times counterclockwise, where is the number of unstable open-loop poles.
For any function holomorphic near the zeros and poles of :
Setting recovers the basic argument principle. Setting gives the sum of the zeros minus the sum of the poles.