ProofComplete

Proof of the Cauchy-Hadamard Formula

The Cauchy-Hadamard formula gives an explicit expression for the radius of convergence of a power series in terms of its coefficients.


Statement

Theorem5.11Cauchy-Hadamard formula (restated)

The radius of convergence of the power series βˆ‘n=0∞an(zβˆ’z0)n\sum_{n=0}^\infty a_n(z-z_0)^n is

R=1lim sup⁑nβ†’βˆžβˆ£an∣1/nR = \frac{1}{\limsup_{n\to\infty} |a_n|^{1/n}}

with the conventions 1/0=∞1/0 = \infty and 1/∞=01/\infty = 0.


Proof

Proof

Set Ξ±=lim sup⁑nβ†’βˆžβˆ£an∣1/n\alpha = \limsup_{n\to\infty} |a_n|^{1/n}. We show the series converges absolutely for ∣zβˆ’z0∣<1/Ξ±|z-z_0| < 1/\alpha and diverges for ∣zβˆ’z0∣>1/Ξ±|z-z_0| > 1/\alpha.

Convergence for ∣zβˆ’z0∣<1/Ξ±|z-z_0| < 1/\alpha:

Choose ρ\rho with ∣zβˆ’z0∣<ρ<1/Ξ±|z-z_0| < \rho < 1/\alpha, so Ξ±<1/ρ\alpha < 1/\rho. Since Ξ±=lim sup⁑∣an∣1/n\alpha = \limsup |a_n|^{1/n}, there exists NN such that ∣an∣1/n<1/ρ|a_n|^{1/n} < 1/\rho for all nβ‰₯Nn \geq N. Therefore ∣an∣<1/ρn|a_n| < 1/\rho^n for nβ‰₯Nn \geq N, giving

∣an(zβˆ’z0)n∣<(∣zβˆ’z0∣ρ)n|a_n(z-z_0)^n| < \left(\frac{|z-z_0|}{\rho}\right)^n

for nβ‰₯Nn \geq N. Since ∣zβˆ’z0∣/ρ<1|z-z_0|/\rho < 1, the series βˆ‘(∣zβˆ’z0∣/ρ)n\sum (|z-z_0|/\rho)^n converges (geometric series), so βˆ‘an(zβˆ’z0)n\sum a_n(z-z_0)^n converges absolutely by comparison.

Divergence for ∣zβˆ’z0∣>1/Ξ±|z-z_0| > 1/\alpha:

Choose ρ\rho with 1/Ξ±<ρ<∣zβˆ’z0∣1/\alpha < \rho < |z-z_0|, so Ξ±>1/ρ\alpha > 1/\rho. Since Ξ±=lim sup⁑∣an∣1/n\alpha = \limsup |a_n|^{1/n}, the inequality ∣an∣1/n>1/ρ|a_n|^{1/n} > 1/\rho holds for infinitely many nn. For these nn:

∣an(zβˆ’z0)n∣>(∣zβˆ’z0∣ρ)nβ†’βˆž.|a_n(z-z_0)^n| > \left(\frac{|z-z_0|}{\rho}\right)^n \to \infty.

The terms do not converge to zero, so the series diverges.

The boundary ∣zβˆ’z0∣=1/Ξ±|z-z_0| = 1/\alpha:

Both convergence and divergence can occur on the boundary circle. For example, βˆ‘zn/n2\sum z^n/n^2 (R=1R = 1, converges on ∣z∣=1|z|=1) and βˆ‘zn\sum z^n (R=1R = 1, diverges on ∣z∣=1|z|=1) have the same radius but different boundary behavior. β– \blacksquare

β– 

Ratio Test Alternative

Theorem5.12Ratio formula

If the limit L=lim⁑nβ†’βˆžβˆ£an+1/an∣L = \lim_{n\to\infty} |a_{n+1}/a_n| exists, then R=1/LR = 1/L.

ExampleComputing radii via ratios

For βˆ‘zn/(n!)\sum z^n/(n!): ∣an+1/an∣=n!/(n+1)!=1/(n+1)β†’0|a_{n+1}/a_n| = n!/(n+1)! = 1/(n+1) \to 0, so R=∞R = \infty.

For βˆ‘nnzn\sum n^n z^n: ∣an+1/an∣=(n+1)n+1/nn=(n+1)(1+1/n)nβ†’βˆžβ‹…e|a_{n+1}/a_n| = (n+1)^{n+1}/n^n = (n+1)(1+1/n)^n \to \infty \cdot e, so R=0R = 0.

For βˆ‘zn/n\sum z^n/n: ∣an+1/an∣=n/(n+1)β†’1|a_{n+1}/a_n| = n/(n+1) \to 1, so R=1R = 1. (Diverges at z=1z=1 but converges at z=βˆ’1z=-1.)


Root Test Connection

RemarkRelationship to the root test

The Cauchy-Hadamard formula is essentially the root test applied to ∣an(zβˆ’z0)n∣|a_n(z-z_0)^n|. The nn-th root of the nn-th term is ∣an∣1/n∣zβˆ’z0∣|a_n|^{1/n}|z-z_0|, and the series converges when lim sup⁑∣an∣1/nβ‹…βˆ£zβˆ’z0∣<1\limsup |a_n|^{1/n} \cdot |z-z_0| < 1, i.e., ∣zβˆ’z0∣<1/lim sup⁑∣an∣1/n=R|z-z_0| < 1/\limsup |a_n|^{1/n} = R.

The root test is stronger than the ratio test: whenever lim⁑∣an+1/an∣\lim |a_{n+1}/a_n| exists, it equals lim sup⁑∣an∣1/n\limsup |a_n|^{1/n}, but the converse can fail (e.g., an=2(βˆ’1)nna_n = 2^{(-1)^n n}).

RemarkSingularities and radius of convergence

For a holomorphic function ff, the radius of convergence of the Taylor series at z0z_0 equals dist(z0,S)\text{dist}(z_0, S) where SS is the set of singularities of ff. Thus the Cauchy-Hadamard formula provides an analytic way to detect the location of singularities from the coefficients.