Proof of the Maximum Modulus Principle
We prove that a non-constant holomorphic function cannot attain its maximum modulus in the interior of its domain. The proof uses the mean value property derived from Cauchy's integral formula.
Proof Using Mean Value Property
Let be holomorphic on a domain . Suppose is a local maximum at some (interior point). We prove must be constant in a neighborhood of .
Step 1: Mean value property.
By Cauchy's integral formula, for any small enough that the disk lies in :
Parametrize the circle by for . Then and
This is the mean value property: equals the average of on the circle .
Step 2: Use the hypothesis that is maximal.
Taking moduli in the mean value property:
By hypothesis, for all . Thus
Equality holds in the triangle inequality. This forces to have constant argument (all values point in the same direction in the complex plane). Moreover, for all .
Step 3: Conclude is constant on the circle.
Write where is continuous. The mean value property gives
For this integral to equal (for some fixed ), we need
This happens if and only if for all (the only way a continuous function on can have average value and modulus everywhere is to be constant). Thus for all .
Step 4: is constant on the disk.
We have shown is constant on the circle . Since was arbitrary (any small enough ), is constant on all circles centered at within . By continuity, is constant in the open disk for some .
Step 5: is constant on by analytic continuation.
Since is constant in a neighborhood of , all derivatives of vanish at . By the identity theorem for holomorphic functions, is constant on the entire connected domain .
Key Ideas
- Mean value property: is the average of on any circle centered at .
- Triangle inequality: Equality in forces and to have the same argument.
- Identity theorem: A holomorphic function constant in a neighborhood is constant on the entire domain (by analytic continuation).
The proof is elementary but powerful: it uses only Cauchy's integral formula and basic properties of holomorphic functions.
Alternate Proof via Harmonic Functions
The function is subharmonic: it satisfies (where is the Laplacian). Subharmonic functions satisfy a maximum principle: a subharmonic function on a bounded domain attains its maximum on the boundary.
Since is subharmonic and non-constant, it cannot attain a local maximum in the interior. Thus cannot attain a local maximum in the interior (since is increasing in ).
This proof connects the maximum modulus principle to potential theory and harmonic analysis. See Harmonic functions.
Corollary: Uniqueness from Boundary Data
If two holomorphic functions and on a bounded domain (continuous on ) agree on the boundary , then on all of .
Proof: Apply the maximum modulus principle to . Since on and attains its maximum on , we have for all , so .
This is a uniqueness theorem: boundary values determine the holomorphic function.
Summary
The maximum modulus principle is fundamental to complex analysis:
- It implies uniqueness from boundary data.
- It is the basis for Schwarz's lemma and the Phragmén-Lindelöf principle.
- It connects to harmonic function theory and potential theory.
- It has applications to approximation theory, PDE, and conformal mapping.
The proof here (via mean value property) is the standard approach, showcasing the power of Cauchy's integral formula.