ProofComplete

Proof of the Maximum Modulus Principle

We prove that a non-constant holomorphic function cannot attain its maximum modulus in the interior of its domain. The proof uses the mean value property derived from Cauchy's integral formula.


Proof Using Mean Value Property

Proof

Let ff be holomorphic on a domain DD. Suppose f(z0)|f(z_0)| is a local maximum at some z0Dz_0 \in D (interior point). We prove ff must be constant in a neighborhood of z0z_0.

Step 1: Mean value property.

By Cauchy's integral formula, for any r>0r > 0 small enough that the disk zz0r|z - z_0| \leq r lies in DD:

f(z0)=12πizz0=rf(z)zz0dz.f(z_0) = \frac{1}{2\pi i} \oint_{|z-z_0|=r} \frac{f(z)}{z - z_0} dz.

Parametrize the circle by z=z0+reiθz = z_0 + re^{i\theta} for θ[0,2π]\theta \in [0, 2\pi]. Then dz=ireiθdθdz = ire^{i\theta} d\theta and

f(z0)=12πi02πf(z0+reiθ)reiθireiθdθ=12π02πf(z0+reiθ)dθ.f(z_0) = \frac{1}{2\pi i} \int_0^{2\pi} \frac{f(z_0 + re^{i\theta})}{re^{i\theta}} \cdot ire^{i\theta} d\theta = \frac{1}{2\pi} \int_0^{2\pi} f(z_0 + re^{i\theta}) d\theta.

This is the mean value property: f(z0)f(z_0) equals the average of ff on the circle zz0=r|z - z_0| = r.

Step 2: Use the hypothesis that f(z0)|f(z_0)| is maximal.

Taking moduli in the mean value property:

f(z0)=12π02πf(z0+reiθ)dθ12π02πf(z0+reiθ)dθ.|f(z_0)| = \left|\frac{1}{2\pi} \int_0^{2\pi} f(z_0 + re^{i\theta}) d\theta\right| \leq \frac{1}{2\pi} \int_0^{2\pi} |f(z_0 + re^{i\theta})| d\theta.

By hypothesis, f(z0+reiθ)f(z0)|f(z_0 + re^{i\theta})| \leq |f(z_0)| for all θ\theta. Thus

f(z0)12π02πf(z0)dθ=f(z0).|f(z_0)| \leq \frac{1}{2\pi} \int_0^{2\pi} |f(z_0)| d\theta = |f(z_0)|.

Equality holds in the triangle inequality. This forces f(z0+reiθ)f(z_0 + re^{i\theta}) to have constant argument (all values point in the same direction in the complex plane). Moreover, f(z0+reiθ)=f(z0)|f(z_0 + re^{i\theta})| = |f(z_0)| for all θ\theta.

Step 3: Conclude ff is constant on the circle.

Write f(z0+reiθ)=f(z0)eiϕ(θ)f(z_0 + re^{i\theta}) = |f(z_0)| e^{i\phi(\theta)} where ϕ(θ)\phi(\theta) is continuous. The mean value property gives

f(z0)=f(z0)2π02πeiϕ(θ)dθ.f(z_0) = \frac{|f(z_0)|}{2\pi} \int_0^{2\pi} e^{i\phi(\theta)} d\theta.

For this integral to equal f(z0)=f(z0)eiϕ0f(z_0) = |f(z_0)| e^{i\phi_0} (for some fixed ϕ0\phi_0), we need

02πeiϕ(θ)dθ=2πeiϕ0.\int_0^{2\pi} e^{i\phi(\theta)} d\theta = 2\pi e^{i\phi_0}.

This happens if and only if ϕ(θ)=ϕ0\phi(\theta) = \phi_0 for all θ\theta (the only way a continuous function on [0,2π][0, 2\pi] can have average value eiϕ0e^{i\phi_0} and modulus 11 everywhere is to be constant). Thus f(z0+reiθ)=f(z0)eiϕ0=f(z0)f(z_0 + re^{i\theta}) = |f(z_0)| e^{i\phi_0} = f(z_0) for all θ\theta.

Step 4: ff is constant on the disk.

We have shown ff is constant on the circle zz0=r|z - z_0| = r. Since r>0r > 0 was arbitrary (any small enough rr), ff is constant on all circles centered at z0z_0 within DD. By continuity, ff is constant in the open disk zz0<r0|z - z_0| < r_0 for some r0>0r_0 > 0.

Step 5: ff is constant on DD by analytic continuation.

Since ff is constant in a neighborhood of z0z_0, all derivatives of ff vanish at z0z_0. By the identity theorem for holomorphic functions, ff is constant on the entire connected domain DD.


Key Ideas

RemarkWhy this proof works
  1. Mean value property: f(z0)f(z_0) is the average of ff on any circle centered at z0z_0.
  2. Triangle inequality: Equality in a+ba+b|a + b| \leq |a| + |b| forces aa and bb to have the same argument.
  3. Identity theorem: A holomorphic function constant in a neighborhood is constant on the entire domain (by analytic continuation).

The proof is elementary but powerful: it uses only Cauchy's integral formula and basic properties of holomorphic functions.


Alternate Proof via Harmonic Functions

RemarkProof using subharmonicity

The function u(z)=f(z)2u(z) = |f(z)|^2 is subharmonic: it satisfies Δu0\Delta u \geq 0 (where Δ\Delta is the Laplacian). Subharmonic functions satisfy a maximum principle: a subharmonic function on a bounded domain attains its maximum on the boundary.

Since f(z)2|f(z)|^2 is subharmonic and non-constant, it cannot attain a local maximum in the interior. Thus f(z)|f(z)| cannot attain a local maximum in the interior (since f=f2|f| = \sqrt{|f|^2} is increasing in f2|f|^2).

This proof connects the maximum modulus principle to potential theory and harmonic analysis. See Harmonic functions.


Corollary: Uniqueness from Boundary Data

RemarkDirichlet problem

If two holomorphic functions ff and gg on a bounded domain DD (continuous on D\overline{D}) agree on the boundary D\partial D, then f=gf = g on all of DD.

Proof: Apply the maximum modulus principle to h=fgh = f - g. Since h(z)=0|h(z)| = 0 on D\partial D and h|h| attains its maximum on D\partial D, we have h(z)=0|h(z)| = 0 for all zDz \in D, so h0h \equiv 0.

This is a uniqueness theorem: boundary values determine the holomorphic function.


Summary

RemarkSignificance

The maximum modulus principle is fundamental to complex analysis:

  1. It implies uniqueness from boundary data.
  2. It is the basis for Schwarz's lemma and the Phragmén-Lindelöf principle.
  3. It connects to harmonic function theory and potential theory.
  4. It has applications to approximation theory, PDE, and conformal mapping.

The proof here (via mean value property) is the standard approach, showcasing the power of Cauchy's integral formula.