ProofComplete

Localization - Key Proof

We prove that localization is exact, one of its most important properties, and demonstrate the local-global principle.

TheoremExactness of Localization

Let S⊆RS \subseteq R be a multiplicative set. If M′→fM→gM′′M' \xrightarrow{f} M \xrightarrow{g} M'' is an exact sequence of RR-modules, then: S−1M′→S−1fS−1M→S−1gS−1M′′S^{-1}M' \xrightarrow{S^{-1}f} S^{-1}M \xrightarrow{S^{-1}g} S^{-1}M'' is exact.

ProofProof of Exactness

We need to show Im(S−1f)=ker⁡(S−1g)\text{Im}(S^{-1}f) = \ker(S^{-1}g).

(⊆\subseteq): If m′/s∈Im(S−1f)m'/s \in \text{Im}(S^{-1}f), then m′/s=(S−1f)(m/t)m'/s = (S^{-1}f)(m/t) for some m/t∈S−1M′m/t \in S^{-1}M'. Applying S−1gS^{-1}g: (S−1g)(m′/s)=(S−1g)((S−1f)(m/t))=(g∘f)(m)/st=0/st=0(S^{-1}g)(m'/s) = (S^{-1}g)((S^{-1}f)(m/t)) = (g \circ f)(m)/st = 0/st = 0 since g∘f=0g \circ f = 0 by exactness of the original sequence.

(⊇\supseteq): Suppose (S−1g)(m/s)=0(S^{-1}g)(m/s) = 0 in S−1M′′S^{-1}M''. Then g(m)/s=0g(m)/s = 0, so there exists t∈St \in S with t⋅g(m)=g(tm)=0t \cdot g(m) = g(tm) = 0 in M′′M''.

By exactness, tm∈ker⁡(g)=Im(f)tm \in \ker(g) = \text{Im}(f), so tm=f(m′)tm = f(m') for some m′∈M′m' \in M'. Therefore: ms=tmts=f(m′)ts=(S−1f)(m′ts)\frac{m}{s} = \frac{tm}{ts} = \frac{f(m')}{ts} = (S^{-1}f)\left(\frac{m'}{ts}\right)

Thus m/s∈Im(S−1f)m/s \in \text{Im}(S^{-1}f), completing the proof.

■
Remark

The proof relies crucially on the ability to "clear denominators" using elements of SS. This technique is fundamental throughout localization theory.

TheoremLocal-Global Principle (Detailed)

An RR-module MM is zero if and only if Mm=0M_\mathfrak{m} = 0 for all maximal ideals m\mathfrak{m}.

ProofProof of Local-Global Principle

(⇒\Rightarrow): Clear, since localizing the zero module gives zero.

(⇐\Leftarrow): Suppose M≠0M \neq 0 and let m∈Mm \in M be non-zero. Consider the annihilator: I=ann(m)={r∈R:rm=0}I = \text{ann}(m) = \{r \in R : rm = 0\}

This is a proper ideal since 1∉I1 \notin I (as m≠0m \neq 0). By the existence of maximal ideals, there exists a maximal ideal m\mathfrak{m} containing II.

In MmM_\mathfrak{m}, the element m/1≠0m/1 \neq 0 because if m/1=0m/1 = 0, then there exists s∈R∖ms \in R \setminus \mathfrak{m} with sm=0sm = 0, contradicting s∉m⊇I=ann(m)s \notin \mathfrak{m} \supseteq I = \text{ann}(m).

Therefore, if Mm=0M_\mathfrak{m} = 0 for all maximal m\mathfrak{m}, we must have M=0M = 0.

■
ExampleApplication to Injectivity

To show f:M→Nf: M \to N is injective, it suffices to show fm:Mm→Nmf_\mathfrak{m}: M_\mathfrak{m} \to N_\mathfrak{m} is injective for all maximal m\mathfrak{m}.

This follows by applying the local-global principle to ker⁡(f)\ker(f): if ker⁡(f)m=ker⁡(fm)=0\ker(f)_\mathfrak{m} = \ker(f_\mathfrak{m}) = 0 for all maximal m\mathfrak{m}, then ker⁡(f)=0\ker(f) = 0, so ff is injective.

ProofProof of Universal Property

Given ϕ:R→T\phi: R \to T with ϕ(S)⊆T×\phi(S) \subseteq T^\times, define ϕ~:S−1R→T\tilde{\phi}: S^{-1}R \to T by ϕ~(r/s)=ϕ(r)ϕ(s)−1\tilde{\phi}(r/s) = \phi(r)\phi(s)^{-1}.

Well-defined: If r/s=r′/s′r/s = r'/s', then t(rs′−r′s)=0t(rs' - r's) = 0 for some t∈St \in S. Applying ϕ\phi: ϕ(t)(ϕ(r)ϕ(s′)−ϕ(r′)ϕ(s))=0\phi(t)(\phi(r)\phi(s') - \phi(r')\phi(s)) = 0

Since ϕ(t)\phi(t) is a unit, ϕ(r)ϕ(s′)=ϕ(r′)ϕ(s)\phi(r)\phi(s') = \phi(r')\phi(s). Multiplying by ϕ(s)−1ϕ(s′)−1\phi(s)^{-1}\phi(s')^{-1} gives ϕ(r)ϕ(s)−1=ϕ(r′)ϕ(s′)−1\phi(r)\phi(s)^{-1} = \phi(r')\phi(s')^{-1}.

Homomorphism: Direct verification shows ϕ~\tilde{\phi} respects addition and multiplication.

Uniqueness: Any homomorphism S−1R→TS^{-1}R \to T extending ϕ\phi must send r/sr/s to ϕ(r)ϕ(s)−1\phi(r)\phi(s)^{-1} since (r/s)⋅(s/1)=r/1(r/s) \cdot (s/1) = r/1 in S−1RS^{-1}R.

■

These proofs establish the foundational properties of localization through elementary but careful manipulation of fractions and ideals.