ProofComplete

Localization - Key Proof

We prove that localization is exact, one of its most important properties, and demonstrate the local-global principle.

TheoremExactness of Localization

Let SRS \subseteq R be a multiplicative set. If MfMgMM' \xrightarrow{f} M \xrightarrow{g} M'' is an exact sequence of RR-modules, then: S1MS1fS1MS1gS1MS^{-1}M' \xrightarrow{S^{-1}f} S^{-1}M \xrightarrow{S^{-1}g} S^{-1}M'' is exact.

ProofProof of Exactness

We need to show Im(S1f)=ker(S1g)\text{Im}(S^{-1}f) = \ker(S^{-1}g).

(\subseteq): If m/sIm(S1f)m'/s \in \text{Im}(S^{-1}f), then m/s=(S1f)(m/t)m'/s = (S^{-1}f)(m/t) for some m/tS1Mm/t \in S^{-1}M'. Applying S1gS^{-1}g: (S1g)(m/s)=(S1g)((S1f)(m/t))=(gf)(m)/st=0/st=0(S^{-1}g)(m'/s) = (S^{-1}g)((S^{-1}f)(m/t)) = (g \circ f)(m)/st = 0/st = 0 since gf=0g \circ f = 0 by exactness of the original sequence.

(\supseteq): Suppose (S1g)(m/s)=0(S^{-1}g)(m/s) = 0 in S1MS^{-1}M''. Then g(m)/s=0g(m)/s = 0, so there exists tSt \in S with tg(m)=g(tm)=0t \cdot g(m) = g(tm) = 0 in MM''.

By exactness, tmker(g)=Im(f)tm \in \ker(g) = \text{Im}(f), so tm=f(m)tm = f(m') for some mMm' \in M'. Therefore: ms=tmts=f(m)ts=(S1f)(mts)\frac{m}{s} = \frac{tm}{ts} = \frac{f(m')}{ts} = (S^{-1}f)\left(\frac{m'}{ts}\right)

Thus m/sIm(S1f)m/s \in \text{Im}(S^{-1}f), completing the proof.

Remark

The proof relies crucially on the ability to "clear denominators" using elements of SS. This technique is fundamental throughout localization theory.

TheoremLocal-Global Principle (Detailed)

An RR-module MM is zero if and only if Mm=0M_\mathfrak{m} = 0 for all maximal ideals m\mathfrak{m}.

ProofProof of Local-Global Principle

(\Rightarrow): Clear, since localizing the zero module gives zero.

(\Leftarrow): Suppose M0M \neq 0 and let mMm \in M be non-zero. Consider the annihilator: I=ann(m)={rR:rm=0}I = \text{ann}(m) = \{r \in R : rm = 0\}

This is a proper ideal since 1I1 \notin I (as m0m \neq 0). By the existence of maximal ideals, there exists a maximal ideal m\mathfrak{m} containing II.

In MmM_\mathfrak{m}, the element m/10m/1 \neq 0 because if m/1=0m/1 = 0, then there exists sRms \in R \setminus \mathfrak{m} with sm=0sm = 0, contradicting smI=ann(m)s \notin \mathfrak{m} \supseteq I = \text{ann}(m).

Therefore, if Mm=0M_\mathfrak{m} = 0 for all maximal m\mathfrak{m}, we must have M=0M = 0.

ExampleApplication to Injectivity

To show f:MNf: M \to N is injective, it suffices to show fm:MmNmf_\mathfrak{m}: M_\mathfrak{m} \to N_\mathfrak{m} is injective for all maximal m\mathfrak{m}.

This follows by applying the local-global principle to ker(f)\ker(f): if ker(f)m=ker(fm)=0\ker(f)_\mathfrak{m} = \ker(f_\mathfrak{m}) = 0 for all maximal m\mathfrak{m}, then ker(f)=0\ker(f) = 0, so ff is injective.

ProofProof of Universal Property

Given ϕ:RT\phi: R \to T with ϕ(S)T×\phi(S) \subseteq T^\times, define ϕ~:S1RT\tilde{\phi}: S^{-1}R \to T by ϕ~(r/s)=ϕ(r)ϕ(s)1\tilde{\phi}(r/s) = \phi(r)\phi(s)^{-1}.

Well-defined: If r/s=r/sr/s = r'/s', then t(rsrs)=0t(rs' - r's) = 0 for some tSt \in S. Applying ϕ\phi: ϕ(t)(ϕ(r)ϕ(s)ϕ(r)ϕ(s))=0\phi(t)(\phi(r)\phi(s') - \phi(r')\phi(s)) = 0

Since ϕ(t)\phi(t) is a unit, ϕ(r)ϕ(s)=ϕ(r)ϕ(s)\phi(r)\phi(s') = \phi(r')\phi(s). Multiplying by ϕ(s)1ϕ(s)1\phi(s)^{-1}\phi(s')^{-1} gives ϕ(r)ϕ(s)1=ϕ(r)ϕ(s)1\phi(r)\phi(s)^{-1} = \phi(r')\phi(s')^{-1}.

Homomorphism: Direct verification shows ϕ~\tilde{\phi} respects addition and multiplication.

Uniqueness: Any homomorphism S1RTS^{-1}R \to T extending ϕ\phi must send r/sr/s to ϕ(r)ϕ(s)1\phi(r)\phi(s)^{-1} since (r/s)(s/1)=r/1(r/s) \cdot (s/1) = r/1 in S1RS^{-1}R.

These proofs establish the foundational properties of localization through elementary but careful manipulation of fractions and ideals.