TheoremComplete

Erdos-Ko-Rado Theorem

The Erdos-Ko-Rado theorem is a cornerstone of extremal set theory, providing a tight upper bound on the size of an intersecting family of kk-element subsets and characterizing the extremal families.


Statement

Theorem4.3Erdos-Ko-Rado Theorem

Let nโ‰ฅ2kn \geq 2k and let FโІ([n]k)\mathcal{F} \subseteq \binom{[n]}{k} be an intersecting family, meaning AโˆฉBโ‰ โˆ…A \cap B \neq \emptyset for all A,BโˆˆFA, B \in \mathcal{F}. Then โˆฃFโˆฃโ‰ค(nโˆ’1kโˆ’1).|\mathcal{F}| \leq \binom{n-1}{k-1}. Moreover, if n>2kn > 2k, equality holds if and only if F\mathcal{F} is a star, i.e., all members of F\mathcal{F} contain a common element.


Proof via Double Counting

Proof

We use the elegant Katona proof via cyclic permutations. Consider the n!n! permutations of [n][n], and for each permutation ฯƒ\sigma, define the nn arcs of length kk cyclically: Ai(ฯƒ)={ฯƒ(i),ฯƒ(i+1),โ€ฆ,ฯƒ(i+kโˆ’1)}A_i(\sigma) = \{\sigma(i), \sigma(i+1), \ldots, \sigma(i+k-1)\} where indices are taken modulo nn.

Claim: Among any nn cyclically consecutive kk-subsets, at most kk can belong to an intersecting family F\mathcal{F}.

Indeed, if Ai,AjโˆˆFA_i, A_j \in \mathcal{F} with i<ji < j, then AiโˆฉAjโ‰ โˆ…A_i \cap A_j \neq \emptyset forces the arcs to overlap, so jโˆ’i<kj - i < k or jโˆ’i>nโˆ’kj - i > n - k. Thus the indices of arcs in F\mathcal{F} form an intersecting family of arcs on the cycle, and at most kk arcs can be mutually intersecting.

Now count pairs (ฯƒ,A)(\sigma, A) where ฯƒ\sigma is a permutation and AโˆˆFA \in \mathcal{F} is one of the nn cyclic arcs of ฯƒ\sigma. Each set AโˆˆFA \in \mathcal{F} appears as a cyclic arc in exactly k!(nโˆ’k)!โ‹…n/n=k!(nโˆ’k)!k!(n-k)! \cdot n / n = k!(n-k)! permutations (there are nn starting positions, but each set is counted once). So the count is โˆฃFโˆฃโ‹…k!(nโˆ’k)!|\mathcal{F}| \cdot k!(n-k)!. On the other hand, for each permutation, at most kk arcs belong to F\mathcal{F}, giving an upper bound of n!โ‹…kn! \cdot k. Therefore: โˆฃFโˆฃโ‹…k!(nโˆ’k)!โ‰คkโ‹…n!โ€…โ€ŠโŸนโ€…โ€ŠโˆฃFโˆฃโ‰คkโ‹…n!k!(nโˆ’k)!=(nโˆ’1kโˆ’1).โ–ก|\mathcal{F}| \cdot k!(n-k)! \leq k \cdot n! \implies |\mathcal{F}| \leq \frac{k \cdot n!}{k!(n-k)!} = \binom{n-1}{k-1}. \qquad \square

โ– 

Extensions

Definition4.4$t$-Intersecting Family

A family FโІ([n]k)\mathcal{F} \subseteq \binom{[n]}{k} is tt-intersecting if โˆฃAโˆฉBโˆฃโ‰ฅt|A \cap B| \geq t for all A,BโˆˆFA, B \in \mathcal{F}. The Frankl-Wilson theorem and the Complete Intersection theorem (Ahlswede-Khachatrian) generalize the EKR bound to tt-intersecting families.

ExampleIntersecting Families with $n = 2k$

When n=2kn = 2k, the bound โˆฃFโˆฃโ‰ค(2kโˆ’1kโˆ’1)=12(2kk)|\mathcal{F}| \leq \binom{2k-1}{k-1} = \frac{1}{2}\binom{2k}{k} still holds, but uniqueness of the extremal family fails. For instance, with n=4,k=2n = 4, k = 2, both the star {{1,2},{1,3},{1,4}}\{\{1,2\}, \{1,3\}, \{1,4\}\} and the family {{1,2},{1,3},{2,3}}\{\{1,2\}, \{1,3\}, \{2,3\}\} achieve the maximum size 3=(31)3 = \binom{3}{1}.

RemarkCross-Intersecting Generalization

The cross-intersecting version states: if A,BโІ([n]k)\mathcal{A}, \mathcal{B} \subseteq \binom{[n]}{k} satisfy AโˆฉBโ‰ โˆ…A \cap B \neq \emptyset for all AโˆˆA,BโˆˆBA \in \mathcal{A}, B \in \mathcal{B}, and nโ‰ฅ2kn \geq 2k, then โˆฃAโˆฃโ‹…โˆฃBโˆฃโ‰ค(nโˆ’1kโˆ’1)2|\mathcal{A}| \cdot |\mathcal{B}| \leq \binom{n-1}{k-1}^2.