ConceptComplete

Kan Extensions - Key Properties

TheoremUniqueness

When Kan extensions exist, they are unique up to unique natural isomorphism. This follows from universal property.

TheoremComposition

Kan extensions compose: LanG(LanFK)LanGFK\text{Lan}_G (\text{Lan}_F K) \cong \text{Lan}_{G \circ F} K when both sides exist. Similarly for right Kan extensions.

TheoremPreservation

Right adjoints preserve right Kan extensions; left adjoints preserve left Kan extensions. More precisely, if FUF \dashv U, then: FLanGKLanG(FK)F \circ \text{Lan}_G K \cong \text{Lan}_G (F \circ K)

TheoremFubini for Kan Extensions

When iterated Kan extensions exist: LanF(LanGK)LanFπ1K\text{Lan}_F (\text{Lan}_G K) \cong \text{Lan}_{F \circ \pi_1} K

where π1\pi_1 is appropriate projection. This is "Fubini theorem" for Kan extensions.

DefinitionPointwise vs Global

Kan extension is pointwise if computed by pointwise formula (limits/colimits over comma categories). Not all Kan extensions are pointwise, but pointwise ones have better properties (absolute, preserved by functors).

TheoremDensity

Functor F:CDF: \mathcal{C} \to \mathcal{D} is dense if LanF(YC)YD\text{Lan}_F (\mathcal{Y}_\mathcal{C}) \cong \mathcal{Y}_\mathcal{D} where Y\mathcal{Y} is Yoneda embedding. Dense functors generate target category.

Example: Inclusion of finite sets into all sets is dense.

TheoremCodensity Monad

For functor F:CDF: \mathcal{C} \to \mathcal{D}, the codensity monad T=RanFFT = \text{Ran}_F F (when exists) is a monad. This generalizes construction of monads from adjunctions.

Remark

These properties show Kan extensions behave well under composition and with adjoints. The pointwise formula provides explicit computation, while abstract universal property ensures uniqueness and functoriality.