ConceptComplete

Conservative Fields and Potential Functions

A conservative vector field is the gradient of a scalar potential, and line integrals in such fields depend only on endpoints. This concept unifies path independence, exactness, and energy conservation.


Characterizations

Definition

A vector field F\mathbf{F} on a domain DD is conservative if there exists a scalar function f:D→Rf : D \to \mathbb{R} (the potential function or scalar potential) such that F=∇f\mathbf{F} = \nabla f. The potential ff is unique up to an additive constant.

Theorem10.1Characterizations of Conservative Fields

For a C1C^1 vector field F\mathbf{F} on an open, simply connected domain D⊆R3D \subseteq \mathbb{R}^3, the following are equivalent:

  1. F\mathbf{F} is conservative: F=∇f\mathbf{F} = \nabla f for some ff
  2. ∮CF⋅dr=0\oint_C \mathbf{F} \cdot d\mathbf{r} = 0 for every closed curve CC in DD
  3. ∫CF⋅dr\int_C \mathbf{F} \cdot d\mathbf{r} is path-independent (depends only on endpoints)
  4. ∇×F=0\nabla \times \mathbf{F} = \mathbf{0} throughout DD (the field is irrotational)

Finding Potential Functions

ExampleFinding a potential function

For F=(2xy+z2,x2,2xz)\mathbf{F} = (2xy + z^2, x^2, 2xz): check ∇×F=0\nabla \times \mathbf{F} = \mathbf{0} (verified). Then:

  1. fx=2xy+z2  ⟹  f=x2y+xz2+g(y,z)f_x = 2xy + z^2 \implies f = x^2 y + xz^2 + g(y,z)
  2. fy=x2+gy=x2  ⟹  gy=0  ⟹  g=h(z)f_y = x^2 + g_y = x^2 \implies g_y = 0 \implies g = h(z)
  3. fz=2xz+h′(z)=2xz  ⟹  h′(z)=0  ⟹  h=Cf_z = 2xz + h'(z) = 2xz \implies h'(z) = 0 \implies h = C

So f(x,y,z)=x2y+xz2+Cf(x,y,z) = x^2 y + xz^2 + C.


Path Independence

ExampleWork done by a conservative force

The work done by F=∇f\mathbf{F} = \nabla f along any path from a\mathbf{a} to b\mathbf{b} is W=∫CF⋅dr=f(b)−f(a)W = \int_C \mathbf{F} \cdot d\mathbf{r} = f(\mathbf{b}) - f(\mathbf{a}) This is the Fundamental Theorem of Line Integrals. For gravity near Earth's surface, F=(0,0,−mg)\mathbf{F} = (0, 0, -mg) and f=−mgzf = -mgz, so work equals −mg(zb−za)-mg(z_b - z_a) regardless of the path taken.

RemarkSimply connected hypothesis

The condition that DD be simply connected is essential for the equivalence ∇×F=0  ⟺  F\nabla \times \mathbf{F} = \mathbf{0} \iff \mathbf{F} is conservative. On domains with "holes," irrotational fields may fail to be conservative. The classic example is F=(−y,x)x2+y2\mathbf{F} = \frac{(-y, x)}{x^2+y^2} on R2∖{0}\mathbb{R}^2 \setminus \{0\}: ∇×F=0\nabla \times \mathbf{F} = 0 but ∮F⋅dr=2π\oint \mathbf{F} \cdot d\mathbf{r} = 2\pi around the origin. This connects vector calculus to the topology of the domain (de Rham cohomology).