ProofComplete

Proof Outline of Prime Number Theorem

We sketch the analytic proof of the Prime Number Theorem, following Hadamard and de la Vallée Poussin.

TheoremPrime Number Theorem (Restated)
ψ(x)∼xas x→∞\psi(x) \sim x \quad \text{as } x \to \infty

where ψ(x)=∑n≤xΛ(n)\psi(x) = \sum_{n \leq x} \Lambda(n).

ProofProof Sketch via Wiener-Ikehara

Step 1: Connect to Zeta Function

Taking logarithmic derivative of the Euler product:

−ζ′(s)ζ(s)=∑n=1∞Λ(n)ns-\frac{\zeta'(s)}{\zeta(s)} = \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{\Lambda(n)}{n^s}

By Perron's formula or Mellin inversion:

ψ(x)=∑n≤xΛ(n)↔−ζ′(s)ζ(s)\psi(x) = \sum_{n \leq x} \Lambda(n) \leftrightarrow -\frac{\zeta'(s)}{\zeta(s)}

Step 2: Establish Zero-Free Region

The key analytic input: prove ζ(1+it)≠0\zeta(1 + it) \neq 0 for all t≠0t \neq 0.

Proof idea: Use the inequality

3+4cos⁡(θ)+cos⁡(2θ)=2(1+cos⁡(θ))2≥03 + 4\cos(\theta) + \cos(2\theta) = 2(1 + \cos(\theta))^2 \geq 0

Applied to ζ(σ)3∣ζ(σ+it)∣4∣ζ(σ+2it)∣≥1\zeta(\sigma)^3 |\zeta(\sigma+it)|^4 |\zeta(\sigma+2it)| \geq 1, this forces ζ(1+it)≠0\zeta(1+it) \neq 0.

Step 3: Analytic Continuation

Since ζ(s)≠0\zeta(s) \neq 0 on ℜ(s)=1\Re(s) = 1, the function:

F(s)=−ζ′(s)ζ(s)F(s) = -\frac{\zeta'(s)}{\zeta(s)}

extends continuously to ℜ(s)≥1\Re(s) \geq 1 except for a simple pole at s=1s=1 with residue 11.

Step 4: Apply Wiener-Ikehara

The Wiener-Ikehara theorem (a Tauberian theorem) states: if F(s)F(s) has the properties in Step 3, then:

∑n≤xΛ(n)∼x\sum_{n \leq x} \Lambda(n) \sim x

This is precisely PNT.

Step 5: Deduce π(x)∼x/log⁡x\pi(x) \sim x/\log x

From ψ(x)∼x\psi(x) \sim x, partial summation gives:

π(x)log⁡x=ψ(x)+∫2xψ(t)tdt=x+o(x)+∫2xt+o(t)tdt∼x\pi(x) \log x = \psi(x) + \int_2^x \frac{\psi(t)}{t} dt = x + o(x) + \int_2^x \frac{t + o(t)}{t} dt \sim x

Therefore π(x)∼x/log⁡x\pi(x) \sim x/\log x.

■
Remark

The genius of the analytic proof is reducing PNT to:

  1. Algebraic fact: Euler product gives −ζ′(s)/ζ(s)=∑Λ(n)/ns-\zeta'(s)/\zeta(s) = \sum \Lambda(n)/n^s
  2. Analytic fact: ζ(1+it)≠0\zeta(1+it) \neq 0 (the zero-free region)
  3. General principle: Wiener-Ikehara Tauberian theorem

Each step is clean and conceptual, unlike elementary proofs which involve intricate combinatorics.

ExampleError Terms

Better zero-free regions yield better error terms:

  • Classical: ℜ(s)≥1−c/log⁡(∣t∣+2)\Re(s) \geq 1 - c/\log(|t|+2) gives ψ(x)=x+O(xe−c′log⁡x)\psi(x) = x + O(x e^{-c'\sqrt{\log x}})
  • RH: ℜ(s)=1/2\Re(s) = 1/2 for all zeros gives ψ(x)=x+O(xlog⁡2x)\psi(x) = x + O(\sqrt{x} \log^2 x) (optimal)