Class Field Theory - Key Proof
We outline the proof of the Artin reciprocity law, the pinnacle of classical algebraic number theory.
The proof of global Artin reciprocity proceeds through several major steps, requiring deep results from algebraic number theory.
Step 1: Local class field theory
First establish local reciprocity: for local fields , construct the local Artin map:
using Lubin-Tate theory (for totally ramified extensions) and explicit construction of unramified extensions (via residue fields). This is more tractable than the global case.
Step 2: Cohomological formulation
Reformulate using group cohomology. The fundamental class in provides a canonical element. The Artin map arises from connecting:
This cohomological perspective, developed by Tate and Artin-Tate, simplifies the proof considerably.
Step 3: Product formula
For , the product formula states:
where the product is over all places (finite and infinite). This connects local invariants globally.
The sum of local invariants in follows, where is the local invariant map.
Step 4: Global reciprocity from local
Combine local reciprocity laws using the product formula. For an abelian extension :
for all . This product compatibility is the global reciprocity law.
Step 5: Existence theorem
Prove that for every open subgroup of finite index, there exists an abelian extension with .
Use class formations and limit arguments: construct as the fixed field of a suitable closed subgroup of .
Step 6: Uniqueness and isomorphism
Combine existence with reciprocity to establish:
is an isomorphism. The kernel identification follows from local-global compatibility.
Conclusion: This establishes the complete Artin reciprocity law, classifying all abelian extensions via generalized class groups.
The full proof requires substantial machinery:
- Cohomology of groups (Tate, Artin-Tate)
- Local class field theory (Lubin-Tate, explicit reciprocity)
- Analytic methods (L-functions, density theorems)
- Algebraic geometry (for modern approaches via Γ©tale cohomology)
The historical development took decades (1920s-1950s), with contributions from Takagi, Artin, Hasse, Chevalley, and many others. Modern proofs via cohomology are more conceptual but still technically demanding.