TheoremComplete

Bokstedt Periodicity

Bokstedt periodicity is the foundational computation of the topological Hochschild homology of the prime field Fp\mathbb{F}_p. It establishes that THHβˆ—(Fp)THH_*(\mathbb{F}_p) is a polynomial algebra, a result that stands in stark contrast to classical Hochschild homology and is the starting point for all subsequent TC computations.


Statement

Theorem8.3BΓΆkstedt Periodicity

For any prime pp, the topological Hochschild homology of Fp\mathbb{F}_p with mod-pp coefficients is:

THHβˆ—(Fp;Fp)β‰…Fp[ΞΌ]THH_*(\mathbb{F}_p; \mathbb{F}_p) \cong \mathbb{F}_p[\mu]

a polynomial algebra on one generator ΞΌ\mu of degree 2. Integrally:

THHn(Fp)β‰…{Fpn=00n=2k,kβ‰₯1Z/pn=2kβˆ’1,kβ‰₯1THH_n(\mathbb{F}_p) \cong \begin{cases} \mathbb{F}_p & n = 0 \\ 0 & n = 2k, k \geq 1 \\ \mathbb{Z}/p & n = 2k - 1, k \geq 1 \end{cases}

The class μ∈THH2(Fp;Fp)\mu \in THH_2(\mathbb{F}_p; \mathbb{F}_p) is called the Bokstedt element.


Comparison with classical Hochschild homology

RemarkClassical vs topological

The classical Hochschild homology gives:

HHn(Fp/Z)β‰…{Fpn=00nβ‰₯1HH_n(\mathbb{F}_p/\mathbb{Z}) \cong \begin{cases} \mathbb{F}_p & n = 0 \\ 0 & n \geq 1 \end{cases}

since Fp\mathbb{F}_p is a perfect field and Ξ©Fp/Z1=0\Omega^1_{\mathbb{F}_p/\mathbb{Z}} = 0.

But THHβˆ—(Fp)β‰ HHβˆ—(Fp/Z)THH_*(\mathbb{F}_p) \neq HH_*(\mathbb{F}_p/\mathbb{Z}): the topological version sees torsion phenomena from "base-changing" over the sphere spectrum S\mathbb{S} instead of Z\mathbb{Z}. The nontrivial groups in THHβˆ—(Fp)THH_*(\mathbb{F}_p) arise from the nontrivial homotopy groups of S\mathbb{S} (the stable homotopy groups of spheres) interacting with Fp\mathbb{F}_p.

This is the crucial innovation of the "brave new algebra" approach: working over S\mathbb{S} instead of Z\mathbb{Z} reveals arithmetic structure invisible to classical homological algebra.


Proof outline

Proof

The proof uses the spectral sequence from the filtration of THHTHH and explicit computations with the dual Steenrod algebra.

Step 1: The Bokstedt spectral sequence. There is a spectral sequence:

Es,t2=HHs(Ο€βˆ—(Fp);Ο€βˆ—(Fp))β€…β€ŠβŸΉβ€…β€ŠTHHs+t(Fp;Fp)E^2_{s,t} = HH_s(\pi_*(\mathbb{F}_p); \pi_*(\mathbb{F}_p)) \implies THH_{s+t}(\mathbb{F}_p; \mathbb{F}_p)

This spectral sequence arises from filtering THHTHH by the "skeleton filtration" of the cyclic bar construction.

Step 2: Identify the E2E^2-page. We have Ο€βˆ—(Fp)=Fp\pi_*(\mathbb{F}_p) = \mathbb{F}_p (concentrated in degree 0), so the E2E^2-page is:

HHs(Fp/Fp;Fp)β‰…{Fps=00sβ‰₯1HH_s(\mathbb{F}_p/\mathbb{F}_p; \mathbb{F}_p) \cong \begin{cases} \mathbb{F}_p & s = 0 \\ 0 & s \geq 1 \end{cases}

Wait -- this is over Fp\mathbb{F}_p, but the base is the sphere spectrum, not Fp\mathbb{F}_p. The correct E2E^2-page uses the "topological" Hochschild homology of HFpH\mathbb{F}_p relative to S\mathbb{S}, which involves the homotopy groups of Fp∧SFp\mathbb{F}_p \wedge_\mathbb{S} \mathbb{F}_p.

By the Kunneth spectral sequence: Ο€βˆ—(HFp∧SHFp)=Ο€βˆ—(HFp∧HFp)\pi_*(H\mathbb{F}_p \wedge_\mathbb{S} H\mathbb{F}_p) = \pi_*(H\mathbb{F}_p \wedge H\mathbb{F}_p), which is the dual Steenrod algebra Aβˆ—βˆ¨\mathcal{A}_*^{\vee}.

Step 3: The dual Steenrod algebra. For p=2p = 2: Aβˆ—βˆ¨=F2[ΞΎ1,ΞΎ2,…]\mathcal{A}_*^{\vee} = \mathbb{F}_2[\xi_1, \xi_2, \ldots] with ∣ξi∣=2iβˆ’1|\xi_i| = 2^i - 1.

For pp odd: Aβˆ—βˆ¨=Fp[ΞΎ1,ΞΎ2,…]βŠ—E(Ο„0,Ο„1,…)\mathcal{A}_*^{\vee} = \mathbb{F}_p[\xi_1, \xi_2, \ldots] \otimes E(\tau_0, \tau_1, \ldots) with ∣ξi∣=2piβˆ’2|\xi_i| = 2p^i - 2 and βˆ£Ο„i∣=2piβˆ’1|\tau_i| = 2p^i - 1.

The Bokstedt spectral sequence becomes:

E2=HHβˆ—(Aβˆ—βˆ¨;Fp)β€…β€ŠβŸΉβ€…β€ŠTHHβˆ—(Fp;Fp).E^2 = HH_*(\mathcal{A}_*^{\vee}; \mathbb{F}_p) \implies THH_*(\mathbb{F}_p; \mathbb{F}_p).

Step 4: Hochschild homology of the dual Steenrod algebra. Using the HKR theorem for smooth algebras (the polynomial part) and the standard computation for exterior algebras:

For pp odd: HHβˆ—(Aβˆ—βˆ¨)β‰…Aβˆ—βˆ¨βŠ—E(σξ1,σξ2,…)βŠ—Ξ“(στ0,στ1,…)HH_*(\mathcal{A}_*^{\vee}) \cong \mathcal{A}_*^{\vee} \otimes E(\sigma\xi_1, \sigma\xi_2, \ldots) \otimes \Gamma(\sigma\tau_0, \sigma\tau_1, \ldots)

where Οƒ\sigma denotes the "suspension" operation and Ξ“\Gamma is the divided power algebra.

Step 5: Differentials and collapse. Bokstedt showed that the spectral sequence has differentials that kill most of the E2E^2-page, leaving:

Eβˆžβ‰…Fp[ΞΌ]E^\infty \cong \mathbb{F}_p[\mu]

where ΞΌ\mu is a permanent cycle of degree 2, arising from the class στ0∈E1,2pβˆ’22\sigma\tau_0 \in E^2_{1, 2p-2} (for pp odd) after a specific differential pattern.

The key differential is d2pβˆ’1(στ0[p])=σξ1β‹…ΞΌd^{2p-1}(\sigma\tau_0^{[p]}) = \sigma\xi_1 \cdot \mu (or similar), which triggers a cascade of differentials collapsing the spectral sequence to the polynomial algebra on ΞΌ\mu.

Step 6: Extension problems. The multiplicative structure of THHβˆ—(Fp;Fp)THH_*(\mathbb{F}_p; \mathbb{F}_p) is determined by the algebra structure of E∞E^\infty together with the fact that there are no non-trivial extensions (by degree considerations). This gives THHβˆ—(Fp;Fp)β‰…Fp[ΞΌ]THH_*(\mathbb{F}_p; \mathbb{F}_p) \cong \mathbb{F}_p[\mu]. β–‘\square

β– 

Consequences

ExampleTHH of β„€ from BΓΆkstedt periodicity

Using the cofiber sequence Sβ†’pSβ†’S/p≃HFp\mathbb{S} \xrightarrow{p} \mathbb{S} \to \mathbb{S}/p \simeq H\mathbb{F}_p and the resulting exact triangle:

THH(Z)β†’pTHH(Z)β†’THH(Fp)THH(\mathbb{Z}) \xrightarrow{p} THH(\mathbb{Z}) \to THH(\mathbb{F}_p)

one deduces THHβˆ—(Z)THH_*(\mathbb{Z}) from Bokstedt periodicity. The long exact sequence:

β‹―β†’THHn+1(Fp)β†’THHn(Z)β†’pTHHn(Z)β†’THHn(Fp)β†’β‹―\cdots \to THH_{n+1}(\mathbb{F}_p) \to THH_n(\mathbb{Z}) \xrightarrow{p} THH_n(\mathbb{Z}) \to THH_n(\mathbb{F}_p) \to \cdots

gives THH2kβˆ’1(Z)β‰…Z/kTHH_{2k-1}(\mathbb{Z}) \cong \mathbb{Z}/k (for kβ‰₯1k \geq 1), recovering Bokstedt's computation of THH(Z)THH(\mathbb{Z}).

RemarkPrismatic and motivic filtrations

Recent work of Bhatt--Morrow--Scholze and Antieau--Mathew--Morrow--Nikolaus establishes that the Bokstedt element ΞΌ\mu is intimately connected to the Breuil--Kisin twist in prismatic cohomology. The motivic filtration on THH(Fp)THH(\mathbb{F}_p) has graded pieces:

gr⁑iTHH(Fp)≃Σ2iHFp\operatorname{gr}^i THH(\mathbb{F}_p) \simeq \Sigma^{2i} H\mathbb{F}_p

and the polynomial generator μ\mu corresponds to the fundamental class in gr⁑1\operatorname{gr}^1. This connects Bokstedt periodicity to the crystalline/prismatic cohomology of Fp\mathbb{F}_p and provides a new perspective on why the polynomial structure arises.