ConceptComplete

Non-Connective K-Theory and the Bass Construction

Non-connective algebraic K-theory extends the K-groups to negative degrees, detecting singularities and non-regularity of rings and schemes. The Bass construction and the Schlichting--Thomason approach provide systematic definitions that satisfy excision and descent properties.


Negative K-groups

Definition7.5Bass's negative K-groups

For a ring RR, Bass defines the negative K-groups Kβˆ’n(R)K_{-n}(R) for nβ‰₯1n \geq 1 by iterating the fundamental theorem. The Bass--Heller--Swan decomposition:

Km(R[t,tβˆ’1])β‰…Km(R)βŠ•Kmβˆ’1(R)βŠ•NKm(R)βŠ•NKm(R)K_m(R[t, t^{-1}]) \cong K_m(R) \oplus K_{m-1}(R) \oplus NK_m(R) \oplus NK_m(R)

allows one to define Kmβˆ’1(R)K_{m-1}(R) as a summand of Km(R[t,tβˆ’1])K_m(R[t, t^{-1}]), bootstrapping from K0K_0 and K1K_1 downward:

Kβˆ’1(R)=coker⁑(K0(R[t])βŠ•K0(R[tβˆ’1])β†’K0(R[t,tβˆ’1]))K_{-1}(R) = \operatorname{coker}\left(K_0(R[t]) \oplus K_0(R[t^{-1}]) \to K_0(R[t, t^{-1}])\right)

Kβˆ’n(R)=Kβˆ’n+1(R[t,tβˆ’1])/(Kβˆ’n+1(R)βŠ•Kβˆ’n(R)βŠ•NilΒ terms)K_{-n}(R) = K_{-n+1}(R[t, t^{-1}]) / (K_{-n+1}(R) \oplus K_{-n}(R) \oplus \text{Nil terms})

For regular rings: Kβˆ’n(R)=0K_{-n}(R) = 0 for all nβ‰₯1n \geq 1.

ExampleNon-vanishing negative K-groups
  1. For the coordinate ring of the node R=k[x,y]/(xy)R = k[x, y]/(xy): Kβˆ’1(R)β‰…ZK_{-1}(R) \cong \mathbb{Z} This detects the singularity: the two branches meeting at a point contribute a Z\mathbb{Z} from the "gluing data" that fails to be captured by K0K_0.

  2. For the cone over a smooth projective variety XX, the ring R=k[C(X)]R = k[C(X)] (homogeneous coordinate ring) satisfies: Kβˆ’n(R)β‰…K~βˆ’n(X)K_{-n}(R) \cong \widetilde{K}_{-n}(X) for nβ‰₯1n \geq 1, where K~\widetilde{K} is reduced K-theory.

  3. For a singular surface SS with isolated singularity at pp, Kβˆ’1(OS,p)K_{-1}(\mathcal{O}_{S,p}) captures the local geometry of the singularity.


The non-connective K-theory spectrum

Definition7.6Non-connective delooping

The non-connective K-theory spectrum KB(R)\mathbf{K}^B(R) (Bass K-theory) is defined as the homotopy colimit:

KB(R)=hocolim⁑(K(R)β†’Ξ©βˆ’1K(R[t,tβˆ’1])/K(R[t])∨K(R[tβˆ’1])→⋯ )\mathbf{K}^B(R) = \operatorname{hocolim}\left(\mathbf{K}(R) \to \Omega^{-1}\mathbf{K}(R[t, t^{-1}]) / \mathbf{K}(R[t]) \vee \mathbf{K}(R[t^{-1}]) \to \cdots \right)

where each step applies the "Bass delooping." This produces a spectrum with:

Ο€n(KB(R))={Kn(R)nβ‰₯0KnBass(R)n<0\pi_n(\mathbf{K}^B(R)) = \begin{cases} K_n(R) & n \geq 0 \\ K_n^{\text{Bass}}(R) & n < 0 \end{cases}

The non-connective spectrum KB\mathbf{K}^B satisfies:

  • Localization: For every localization Rβ†’Sβˆ’1RR \to S^{-1}R, there is a fiber sequence of spectra.
  • Excision: The Mayer--Vietoris sequence extends to all integers.
  • Descent: KB\mathbf{K}^B satisfies Nisnevich descent on schemes (Thomason--Trobaugh).
RemarkConnective vs non-connective

The connective K-theory spectrum K(R)\mathbf{K}(R) has Ο€n=0\pi_n = 0 for n<0n < 0 by definition. The non-connective KB(R)\mathbf{K}^B(R) can have nonzero negative homotopy groups.

The connective cover gives a map K(R)β†’KB(R)\mathbf{K}(R) \to \mathbf{K}^B(R) inducing isomorphisms on Ο€n\pi_n for nβ‰₯0n \geq 0. The difference matters for:

  1. Localization sequences: The connecting maps Kn+1(U)β†’Kn(Z)K_{n+1}(U) \to K_n(Z) in the Thomason--Trobaugh sequence work best with KB\mathbf{K}^B, since Kn(Z)K_n(Z) can be negative.

  2. Descent: KB\mathbf{K}^B satisfies Nisnevich descent while K\mathbf{K} generally does not (the obstruction is measured by negative K-groups).

  3. Regularity detection: RR is regular iff Kβˆ’nB(R)=0K_{-n}^B(R) = 0 for all n>0n > 0 (assuming RR is Noetherian of finite dimension).


Schlichting's approach

Definition7.7Schlichting's non-connective K-theory

Schlichting provides an intrinsic construction of non-connective K-theory for exact categories, avoiding the Bass delooping machine. For an exact category E\mathcal{E}, define:

KSch(E)=hofib⁑(K(E)β†’K(E[E]))[βˆ’1]\mathbf{K}^{\text{Sch}}(\mathcal{E}) = \operatorname{hofib}\left(K(\mathcal{E}) \to K(\mathcal{E}[\mathcal{E}])\right)[-1]

where E[E]\mathcal{E}[\mathcal{E}] is the "idempotent completion" or "Karoubi envelope," and the homotopy fiber captures the "missing" negative K-theory.

For E=P(R)\mathcal{E} = \mathcal{P}(R): KSch(P(R))≃KB(R)\mathbf{K}^{\text{Sch}}(\mathcal{P}(R)) \simeq \mathbf{K}^B(R).

The advantage: Schlichting's construction works for abstract exact categories and DG-categories, not just module categories.

ExampleComputing K₋₁

For a commutative Noetherian ring RR, Bass gives an explicit description:

Kβˆ’1(R)=coker⁑(K0(R[t])βŠ•K0(R[tβˆ’1])β†’j+βˆ’jβˆ’K0(R[t,tβˆ’1]))K_{-1}(R) = \operatorname{coker}\left(K_0(R[t]) \oplus K_0(R[t^{-1}]) \xrightarrow{j_+ - j_-} K_0(R[t, t^{-1}])\right)

where jΒ±j_\pm are induced by the inclusions. If RR is reduced, this simplifies:

Kβˆ’1(R)β‰…coker⁑(K~0(R)βŠ•K~0(R)β†’K~0(R[t,tβˆ’1])/K~0(R))K_{-1}(R) \cong \operatorname{coker}\left(\widetilde{K}_0(R) \oplus \widetilde{K}_0(R) \to \widetilde{K}_0(R[t, t^{-1}]) / \widetilde{K}_0(R)\right)

For the node R=k[x,y]/(xy)=k[x]Γ—kk[y]R = k[x, y]/(xy) = k[x] \times_{k} k[y]: Using the Mayer--Vietoris square and the fundamental theorem, one computes Kβˆ’1(R)β‰…ZK_{-1}(R) \cong \mathbb{Z}, generated by the "loop" class around the singular point.

For regular RR: both K0(R)β†’K0(R[t])K_0(R) \to K_0(R[t]) are isomorphisms by homotopy invariance, so Kβˆ’1(R)=0K_{-1}(R) = 0.


Properties of negative K-theory

RemarkVanishing and regularity

The following are equivalent for a Noetherian ring RR of finite Krull dimension dd:

  1. RR is regular (all localizations have finite global dimension).
  2. Kβˆ’n(R)=0K_{-n}(R) = 0 for all nβ‰₯1n \geq 1.
  3. Kβˆ’1(R)=0K_{-1}(R) = 0 and RR is locally regular in codimension ≀dβˆ’1\leq d - 1 (under mild hypotheses).

Moreover, Kβˆ’n(R)=0K_{-n}(R) = 0 for n>dn > d (Weibel's vanishing conjecture, proved by Kerz--Strunk--Tamme): the negative K-groups are bounded below by the Krull dimension.

This gives a "K-theoretic characterization of regularity": a Noetherian ring is regular if and only if its non-connective K-theory spectrum is connective.